RSS

Author Archives: TJ's Man

Unknown's avatar

About TJ's Man

Began working with the Sunset Avenue church of Christ in Madera, California on September 8, 2013.

The Many Sides Of God’s Love – Psalm 89  


cropped-12510287_10153326794316658_2876917969286783602_n.jpgWith the deepest of meaning yet with the simplest of phrasing, John wrote in 1 John 4:8 that “God is love”. We’re told in Psalm 89:13-14 that the foundation of God’s throne is righteousness and justice: You have a mighty arm; strong is your hand, high your right hand. 14 Righteousness and justice are the foundation of your throne; steadfast love and faithfulness go before you.

 The core of His being is love. The loving nature of God should prompt us to ask, “How does God love His people?” The answer to this question is given in Psalm 89.

 This is called the majestic Covenant Psalm, which, according to the Jewish arrangement closes the third book of the Psalms. It is the utterance of a believer, in presence of great national disaster, pleading with God, urging the grand argument of covenant engagements, and expecting deliverance and help, because of the faithfulness of Jehovah.
Psalm 89:1-8 (ESV)
1  I will sing of the steadfast love of the LORD, forever; with my mouth I will make known your faithfulness to all generations.

 The Psalmist has a very sad complaint to make of the deplorable condition of the family of David at this time, and yet he begins the Psalm with songs of praise; for we must in everything, in every state, give thanks. We think when we are in trouble we get ease by complaining: but we do more, we get joy, by praising. Let our complaints therefore be turned into thanksgiving; and in these verses we find that which will be in matter of praise and thanksgiving for us in the worst of times, whether upon a personal or public account.

2  For I said, “Steadfast love will be built up forever; in the heavens you will establish your faithfulness.”
3  You have said, “I have made a covenant with my chosen one; I have sworn to David my servant:
4  ‘I will establish your offspring forever, and build your throne for all generations.’” Selah
5  Let the heavens praise your wonders, O LORD, your faithfulness in the assembly of the holy ones!
6  For who in the skies can be compared to the LORD? Who among the heavenly beings is like the LORD,
7  a God greatly to be feared in the council of the holy ones, and awesome above all who are around him?
8  O LORD God of hosts, who is mighty as you are, O LORD, with your faithfulness all around you?

 First, His love is a covenant love.

All of His relationships with man have come out of the covenants He has established with him.

Psalm 89:28 My steadfast love I will keep for him forever, and my covenant will stand firm for him.
29  I will establish his offspring forever and his throne as the days of the heavens.
30  If his children forsake my law and do not walk according to my rules,
31  if they violate my statutes and do not keep my commandments,
32  then I will punish their transgression with the rod and their iniquity with stripes,
33  but I will not remove from him my steadfast love or be false to my faithfulness.
34  I will not violate my covenant or alter the word that went forth from my lips.

 He has bound Himself—in the past and in the present—by the agreements He has made with His people. He will show His love by keeping His part of those promises.

The writer of Hebrews, quoting from Jere­miah 31:33, 34, wrote concerning the new cov­enant for the Christian Era.

Hebrews 8:8-13 (ESV) “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will establish a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah,
9  not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt. For they did not continue in my covenant, and so I showed no concern for them, declares the Lord.
10  For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my laws into their minds, and write them on their hearts, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.
11  And they shall not teach, each one his neighbor and each one his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest.
12  For I will be merciful toward their iniquities, and I will remember their sins no more.”
13  In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.

Under this covenant, God would put His laws in His people’s minds and hearts. The cross is the heart of God’s covenant with us. It brought into being this special age that is governed by the new covenant. What is key for us is to realize that we must participate in this process: allowing time in our busy schedules to take in the knowledge (mind) of God from His Word and allow it time to reach our life (heart..emotions).

Hebrews 9:26 (ESV) for then he would have had to suffer repeatedly since the foundation of the world. But as it is, he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.

 “The end of the ages” refers to the end of the old covenant and the bringing about of the new age, the age of complete for- giveness from God. Indeed, God is the God of the new covenant, which is His agreement with us to save us through Christ’s blood.

 Second, His love is a faithful love.

He will be true to those who trust in Him by keeping His word to them. Nothing on earth or in heaven is more reliable than God’s love.

34  I will not violate my covenant or alter the word that went forth from my lips.

 11  The heavens are yours; the earth also is yours; the world and all that is in it, you have founded them.
12  The north and the south, you have created them; Tabor and Hermon joyously praise your name.
13  You have a mighty arm; strong is your hand, high your right hand.
14  Righteousness and justice are the foundation of your throne; steadfast love and faithfulness go before you.
15  Blessed are the people who know the festal shout, who walk, O LORD, in the light of your face,
16  who exult in your name all the day and in your righteousness are exalted.
17  For you are the glory of their strength; by your favor our horn is exalted.
18  For our shield belongs to the LORD, our king to the Holy One of Israel.

 24  My faithfulness and my steadfast love shall be with him, and in my name shall his horn be exalted.
25  I will set his hand on the sea and his right hand on the rivers.
26  He shall cry to me, ‘You are my Father, my God, and the Rock of my salvation.’
27  And I will make him the firstborn, the highest of the kings of the earth.

 As certainly as the sun shines and the moon rises, God will keep His eternal word.

35  Once for all I have sworn by my holiness; I will not lie to David.
36  His offspring shall endure forever, his throne as long as the sun before me.
37  Like the moon it shall be established forever, a faithful witness in the skies.” Selah

 God wanted to show us that His promise to us will stand, so He guaranteed it by His word and an oath.

Hebrews 6:17-20 (ESV)  So when God desired to show more convincingly to the heirs of the promise the unchangeable character of his purpose, he guaranteed it with an oath,
18  so that by two unchangeable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie, we who have fled for refuge might have strong encouragement to hold fast to the hope set before us.
19  We have this as a sure and steadfast anchor of the soul, a hope that enters into the inner place behind the curtain,
20  where Jesus has gone as a forerunner on our behalf, having become a high priest forever after the order of Melchizedek.

This assurance of His faithfulness to us gives the strongest hope, which, in turn, provides an anchor for our souls.

Third, His love is a righteous love.

He is holy and cannot sin or be tempted to sin: James 1:13 (ESV) Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am being tempted by God,” for God cannot be tempted with evil, and he himself tempts no one.

He will see to it that His promises are kept, but He will keep them in harmony with His righteous character. If man violates the covenant he has entered into with God, man will be punished; even if God’s people trans­gress and do not keep His commandments, they will suffer the consequences.

Judgment is ­necessary because of the righteous character of His love. No child ultimately appreciates a parental love that contains no high or holy standards.

God’s righteousness demanded the cross. Those who abide in the justification provided by Jesus’ death are protected from the awful condemnation of sin. Our Savior’s sacrifice was a demonstration of God’s righteousness:

 James 1:13 (ESV) Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am being tempted by God,” for God cannot be tempted with evil, and he himself tempts no one.

In Him we have God’s con­tinual offer of His grace. John assured us, “If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness” (1 John 1:9).

 Fourth, His love has an eternal character.

He loves the world and His people with a deep, abiding, never-ending love. God said of His people, “I have loved you with an everlasting love” (Jeremiah 31:3b). God is the father in the story of the prodigal son (Luke 15), ever watch­ing for the return of His children.

The cross of Jesus rises above time in reach­ing to those who have lived, who are living, and who will live. His death is the crux of the Bible. That which went before looked forward to it, and that which comes after looks backward to it. The cross is the eternal expression of the love of God for man.

No love could be more reassuring and com­forting than the love that God has for His people. His eternal covenant love should inflame within us the desire and the determination to spend our entire lives in His love.

How does God want to be known? For His great power? For His complete knowledge? Psalm 89 says that He is building up the knowledge of His loving­kindness and faithfulness day by day. He wants this special structure of understanding to be known throughout the world and heaven.

 “The Son of God became the Son of Man to change the sons of men into sons of God.”

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 28, 2016 in God, Sermon

 

Great Themes of the Bible: Honesty


Honesty.jpg“We have renounced secret and shameful ways; we do not use deception, nor do we destroy the word of God. On the contrary, by setting forth the truth plainly we commend ourselves to every man’s conscience in the sight of God” (2 Cor. 4:2).

In a perfect world, upright people would never suffer from the machinations of wicked ones, and a liar would never have the advantage over someone who tells the truth. In a fallen world, however, it doesn’t always work that way. And that makes some people wonder if it is worth it to be honest, to tell the truth, to resist temptations to cheat on homework, taxes, or mates. These aren’t new problems.

Do you remember how Jesus met his fate on a Roman cross in Jerusalem? Perjured testimony led to his conviction on a trumped-up charge of treason against the empire. So it should not surprise us that Paul met opposition in his evangelistic work. Part of that opposition came in the form of lies told about him; part of it was the accusation that he was a liar himself.

In today’s text, Paul defends himself against the charge that he had somehow been deceptive in his teaching or had distorted Scripture. He insists that he had done nothing shameful or exploitive. There were, even then, manipulative techniques that public speakers and politicians would use to spin their message or to dupe potential followers. False advertising is nothing new.

On top of that charge, Paul’s Jewish opponents appear to have been accusing him of destroying the Word of God because he would no longer embrace their legalisms for himself or permit them to force them on his Gentile converts. They wanted the Gentiles held accountable to the Law’s requirements about circumcision, kosher foods, and the like. When Paul would not hear to it, they tried to undermine his reputation with charges of duplicity, scheming, and dishonesty with the Word of God.

Paul refused to waste his time in what would have been a pointless self-defense against each of their charges. He chose, instead, to declare that he was content to continue living uprightly and working openly “in the sight of God” and to leave the matter “to every man’s conscience” to observe, weigh, and draw his own conclusion.

That is what most of us have to be willing to do who come under scrutiny and have to face the judgment of our peers. Sometimes there is a single fact or litigation event that can clear things up. More often, one must simply keep on doing right, trust that people of good will can discern integrity over time, and be confident that God knows the truth — and will vindicate those who honor him.

I wish I could assure you it always works out that way in the short term. That would not be honest of me! It is the long-term view that I have in mind. Honesty doesn’t win every battle, but it will prevail far more often than deception and falsehoods. And when everything is put into the light before God at the end, truth wins — hands down!

We Have a Problem

Our culture has a serious problem with honesty. Perhaps I should say that our problem is with being dishonest.

Perhaps you remember the furor caused ten years ago when authors James Patterson and Peter Kim released their book The Day America Told the Truth. Their research with an extensive questionnaire was disheartening. He is a sampling of what they found:

91% said they lie regularly — both at work and in their personal lives;
86% lie to their parents;
75% lie to their best friends;
73% lie to their siblings;
69% lie to their spouses;
50% feel free to call in sick to work when they are perfectly well.

We know our government has lied to us about everything from illegal assassination plots against Fidel Castro to activities in Vietnam to secret deals made in the nation’s capitol. So citizens feel justified in cheating on their taxes to a government that lies to them, and kids have defied teachers or parents to punish them for telling lies by pointing first at Nixon and later at Clinton as their defense.

Our culture has become cynical about truth. When somebody thinks the right to lie has been established, there is no drawing the line.

Do you ever read political commentary — otherwise placed on the comics page — in your newspaper? One of my favorite strips is “The Wizard of Id.” It occasionally rebukes our glibness with lies by means of humor. For example, I remember a series of strips about golf and politics.

In one of them, the king tells his golf instructor he had a three on a certain hole. “Not bad,” said the pro. “Now, try it again without the smirk.” In another strip, Rodney told the king he had found the ideal caddy for him. When asked about the man’s experience, Rodney said he was a forest ranger — and got thrown into jail!

But my favorite one was a two-frame strip in which Spook asked his jailer, “Do you know what politicians and golf pros both do best?” “What?” bit the jailer. And Spook’s answer came through the cell door: “Get out of trouble . . . with bad lies.”

One of the brightest-turned-quickly-dark stories I’ve ever read was about a New York City student who turned in a purse she had found — complete with $1,000 in cash. Not a single school official in the city’s educational system would congratulate her on her virtue. “If I come from a position of what is right and wrong,” explained her teacher, “then I am not [my students’] counselor.”

Oh, yes. We have a problem. We have a serious problem. We don’t want to affirm the biblical principles taught in unambiguous texts. For example, how long since you have read Proverbs 6:16-19 and thought about the fact that three of the seven things God hates relate directly to dishonesty?

There are six things the LORD hates, seven that are detestable to him:haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to rush into evil, a false witness who pours out lies and a man who stirs up dissension among brothers.

The message in the New Testament is the same. “Do not lie to each other, since you have taken off your old self with its practices and have put on the new self, which is being renewed in knowledge in the image of its Creator” (Col. 3:9).

Honesty With Words

One of my favorite proverbs about truth-telling, honesty, and personal integrity is this one: “The wicked man flees though no one pursues, but the righteous are as bold as a lion” (Prov. 28:1).

What does it mean?

  • It means that people with something to hide, hide — and cringe; people who live in truth and integrity hold up their heads and move on.
  • It means that lying is hard and complicates your life; it’s hard to remember what you told each person, to keep your story straight, and to keep the people to whom you’ve lied away from one another.
  • It means that telling the truth is simpler and more practical; you never have to cover your trail and can simply be open and transparent with others.

There is no release from the moral duty of truth-telling because someone has lied about you. It is still unethical to lie to a liar, to deceive a deceiver, to fight fire with fire. When that is the strategy you choose, all that will be left at the end of the day are the ashes of your personal integrity.

Some people understand what I have called openness and transparency in unhealthy ways. You don’t need to share more information than someone actually needs. There is no call for you to become an exhibitionist. And there is certainly no virtue in inflicting pain on someone by telling a truth that crushes and hurts another person to no good purpose. Some people simply vent and dump on others — all in the name of honesty. No, that’s boorishness and sometimes verbal abuse.

There are some things people have no right to know about you and that you have to right to pry to learn about them. My mother told me never to ask these three questions: How old are you? How much do you weigh? How much did that cost? And the principle behind those questions — that it is wrong to pry into another’s life — is right. Unless you are entitled to information for your own moral or spiritual protection, don’t go snooping into another person’s life. You may find things that will cause you too much pain and anguish. Enough of those things will come to you without being sought to fill your life and occupy your energies.

Honesty With Life

Honesty with words is only one component of total-life honesty before the Lord. When Jesus challenged the Samaritan woman he met at Jacob’s well to worship God “in spirit and in truth,” that’s what he was asking for from her (John 4:24). Do you remember where their conversation started? After the Son of Man had asked her for a drink of water and engaged her in conversation, he said, “Go, call your husband and come back.” She said, “I have no husband.” Then a most interesting thing happened.

Jesus said to her, “You are right when you say you have no husband. The fact is, you have had five husbands, and the man you now have is not your husband. What you have just said is quite true.”
“Sir,” the woman said, “I can see that you are a prophet. Our fathers worshiped on this mountain, but you Jews claim that the place where we must worship is in Jerusalem” (John 4:17-20).

The forgiving and gracious Son of God was trying to lead this woman — divorced five times already and choosing now to live with a man without bothering to marry — into the light of salvation. Before he could save her, she had to be willing to be totally honest about just how messed up and miserable she was. So Jesus led her right to the edge not of Jacob’s well but of heaven’s Living Water and invited her to drink.

He let her know the cat was out of the bag about her confused and guilt-ridden life. Would she drink? No! She wanted to change the subject from salvation to church! That is, she threw out the old Samaritan-Jew debate about the location and manner of worship as an alternative topic to her need for a Savior.

That’s when Jesus bored in on the real issue. “Dear lady, won’t you get past these fascinating diversions so we can talk about your real needs?” he was asking. “Won’t you see that worship is a matter of spirit (i.e., your heart linked to God’s heart) and truth (i.e., your brokenness acknowledged in total honesty) rather than hill and house?”

What is the church supposed to be? How are we supposed to function? How do we learn to care about one another? The answer is probably best summed up in this old adage: misery loves company. In leper colonies around the world, racial and caste divisions that otherwise would be significant are set aside. In AIDS clinics and support groups for recovering drug addicts, bank presidents and school dropouts become friends. Spoiled kids and neglected elderly people come together to help one another. The same thing happens in a church where the Spirit of Christ is allowed to work.

The pain caused by sin creates a “fellowship of the huddled-together.” People who have been washed clean by Christ’s blood are bound together in his restoring grace. The fellowship of daily encouragement creates not only togetherness but oneness.

Think of Christians who have these descriptions in their past: whores, drunks, liars, people with AIDS, gossips, illiterates — and put them together with preachers, parents, Bible scholars, and teachers….all are giving loving support to each other. They don’t judge each other. They don’t check up on one another.

They don’t really care what the other person once did out there in hell. They realize those sins are in the past (God’s and Christian’s). All they care about is helping one another get glimpses of the Father’s smile and to get healthy. That’s very hard for outsiders to understand. It only happens where people get honest, walk in the light, and begin to heal.

Are you hurting? Pray. Do you feel great? Sing. Are you sick? Believing-prayer will heal you, and Jesus will put you on you feet. And if you’ve sinned, you’ll be forgiven — healed inside and out.

Make this your common practice: Confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you can live together whole and healed. The prayer of a person living right with God is something powerful and to be reckoned with (James 5:13-16, The Message).

Conclusion

Dr. Perry Buffington, a licensed psychologist and author, claims that research in his field has found there are at least three situations when we tend not to be ourselves.

  1. First, the average person will “put on airs” when he or she visits the lobby of a fancy and expensive hotel.
  2. Second, the typical man or woman will try to hide her emotions — if not her face — when she steps onto a car lot or into a new-car showroom.
  3. And, third, we try to fake out one another — and maybe God too — when we walk in and take our seats in church.

Of all the places where honesty isn’t just the best policy for our words but must be the hallmark of our personal integrity as needy sinners, an authentic experience of Christ will not permit pretense and phoniness. When church is really church, it is only because we have dared to be honest in our whole lives with God and one another. That was Paul on the Damascus Road and among the people of Corinth. And it can be you and me as well.

HONESTY

A commentary of the times is that the word honesty is now preceded by old-fashioned. Larry Wolters

Being entirely honest with oneself is a good exercise. Sigmund Freud (1856–1939)

Candor is always a double-edged sword; it may heal or it may separate. Wilhelm Stekel

Honesty consists of the unwillingness to lie to others; maturity, which is equally hard to attain, consists of the unwillingness to lie to oneself. Sydney J. Harris (1917–1986)

Honesty has a beautiful and refreshing simplicity about it. No ulterior motives. No hidden meanings. An absence of hypocrisy, duplicity, political games, and verbal superficiality. As honesty and real integrity characterize our lives, there will be no need to manipulate others. Charles R. Swindoll (1934– )

I hope I shall always possess firmness and virtue enough to maintain what I consider the most enviable of all titles, the character of an honest man. George Washington (1732–1799)

Say what you have to say, not what you ought. Any truth is better than make-believe. Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 21, 2016 in Doctrine

 

Great Themes of the Bible: Loving One Another


(Romans 12:9-13 NIV)  Love must be sincere. Hate what is evil; cling to what is good. {10} Be devoted to one another in brotherly love. Honor one another above yourselves. {11} Never be lacking in zeal, but keep your spiritual fervor, serving the Lord. {12} Be joyful in hope, patient in affliction, faithful in prayer. {13} Share with God’s people who are in need. Practice hospitality.

There are people all around us who are starving for love. For the sake of its absence, people dull their intense pain with drugs, give themselves to sexual predators who persuade them to confuse having sex with being loved, or otherwise try to fill a huge empty hole in their hearts.

The church is intended by God to be not only a community of faith but of hope and love as well. With God as our Father, we are brothers and sisters to one another — looking out for one another so that nobody is forced to feel like an orphaned child whom nobody wants.

Our society is also obsessed with sports, recreation, entertainment, and emotional gratification, and it is paying the consequences of that unbalanced preoccupation. When such pursuits exceed their reasonable roles, they become conspicuous marks of the shallow, superficial, and often decadent society that cultivates them. “Bodily discipline is only of little profit,” Paul cautions, “but godliness is profitable for all things, since it holds promise for the present life and also for the life to come” (1 Tim. 4:8).

Teddy Roosevelt once commented, “The things that will destroy America are prosperity at any price, peace at any price, safety first instead of duty first, the love of soft living and the get-rich theory of life.” That observation is still valid.

The only productive life, as well as the only truly satisfying life, is the self-disciplined life. That is certainly true of the Christian life. Although our spiritual guidance and power come from the Lord, He can only work effectively through lives that are subjected to Him. “Everyone who competes in the games exercises self-control in all things,” Paul reminded the church at Corinth. “They then do it to receive a perishable wreath, but we an imperishable. Therefore I run in such a way, as not without aim; I box in such a way, as not beating the air; but I buffet my body and make it my slave, lest possibly, after I have preached to others, I myself should be disqualified” (1 Cor. 9:25-27).

Only the disciplined mind can think clearly and be used of the Lord to properly understand and present His truth to the world. Only the disciplined mind can effectively evaluate and challenge the world’s ideals and standards in the light of that truth. By the same token, only the disciplined Christian life can be a persuasive and effective example, both within the church and before the world.

In his book The Disciplined Life, Richard Shelley Taylor writes, Disciplined character belongs to the person who achieves balance by bringing all his faculties and powers under control … He resolutely faces his duty. He is governed by a sense of responsibility. He has inward resources and personal reserves which are the wonder of weaker souls. He brings adversity under tribute, and compels it to serve him. When adversity becomes too over-whelming and blows fall which he cannot parry, be bows to them, but is not broken by them. His spirit still soars.

Simply put, self-discipline is the willingness to subordinate personal desires and objectives to those that are selfless and divine, to subordinate that which is attractive and easy to that which is right and necessary. For the Christian, self-discipline is obedience to the Word of God, the willingness to subordinate everything in our lives—physical, emotional, social, intellectual, moral, and spiritual—to God’s will and control, and for God’s glory.

It is as absurd as it is unbiblical to believe that anyone can live a faithful, fruitful Christian life on mere good intentions and warm feelings for the Lord and His work. The Christian life is an accountable life, and, by definition, accountability is based on specific principles and standards. For the Christian, they are the divinely-revealed principles and standards to which God holds each of His children. It is because we are accountable that the Lord disciplines us when we disobey His Word and ignore His will.

“You have forgotten the exhortation which is addressed to you as sons,” the writer of Hebrews reminds us: “‘My son, do not regard lightly the discipline of the Lord, nor faint when you are reproved by Him; for those whom the Lord loves He disciplines, and He scourges every son whom He receives.’ It is for discipline that you endure; God deals with you as with sons; for what son is there whom his father does not discipline? … All discipline for the moment seems not to be joyful, but sorrowful; yet to those who have been trained by it, afterwards it yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness” (Heb. 12:5-7, 11; cf. Prov. 3:11-12).

The nineteenth-century Englishman Robert C. Chapman wrote, “Seeing that so many preach Christ and so few live Christ, I will aim to live Him.” His good friend J. N. Darby said of him, “He lives what I teach.”

It was said of the popular nineteenth-century English author William Arnot, “His preaching is good. His writing is better. His living is best of all.” Would that it could be said of all Christians that their living is best of all.

A person who has been justifid by God’s grace, who has presented his body as “a living and holy sacrifice” (Rom. 12:1), and who is exercising the spiritual gifts the Lord has given him (vv. 3-8), will experience an outflowing of sanctified, spiritual living. In other words, a person who is saved will evidence his salvation by the way he lives. And because the obedient, disciplined, and productive Christian life is directed and empowered by God’s own Spirit, Christian living is supernatural living. In that sense, it is abnormal, unnatural living—living that is not natural to and cannot be attained by the unregenerate man.

Supernatural living is conducted “in a manner worthy of the gospel of Christ” (Phil. 1:27). Supernatural living is “to have this attitude in [ourselves] which was also in Christ Jesus” (2:5) and humbly to “work out [our] salvation with fear and trembling” (2:12). But the working out of our salvation is no more accomplished in our own power than the new birth was accomplished in our own power. “It is God who is at work in [us], both to will and to work for His good pleasure” (2:13).

In short, supernatural living is conforming our outer lives to our inner lives, living out the redeemed, purified, and holy nature we have in Jesus Christ, becoming in practice what we are in position and new creation.

But supernatural living is not a mystical, undefined life based on elusive good impulses and sincere intentions. It is practical living that results from conscious obedience to God’s standards of righteousness, a life lived within divinely-ordained parameters. It is thinking, speaking, and acting in daily conformity with God’s Word and will.

Supernatural living is free in that it is no longer under the bondage of sin. But it also is enslaved, in that it is unalterably bound to the righteous will of God. “Thanks be to God,” Paul has declared earlier in this letter, “that though [we] were slaves of sin, [we] became obedient from the heart to that form of teaching to which [we] were committed, and having been freed from sin, [we] became slaves of righteousness” (Rom. 6:17-18). With Martin Luther, every Christian should be able to say, “My conscience is captive to the Word of God.”

Through Romans 12:8, Paul has laid the doctrinal foundation of the justified, sanctified, and dedicated Christian life. In the rest of the epistle, he focuses on specific ways in which believers must live their lives in obedience to God’s Word and to the glory of His name. The call to practical, holy living is the climax of this rich epistle.

In 12:9-21, Paul gives a comprehensive, but not exhaustive, list of the basic characteristics of the supernatural Christian life. In essence, he is giving the same admonition he had given to Corinthian believers a year or so earlier: “Therefore, having these promises, beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all defilement of flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God” (2 Cor. 7:1). It is because of all that God has done for us and all that He has equipped us with that we are to respond by faithful, obedient, Spirit-empowered living.

We are God’s “workmanship,” Paul explained to the church at Ephesus, “created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them” (Eph. 2:10). Salvation is designed to produce in us an unmistakable pattern of godly, righteous living. We will bear some fruit, but the Lord wants us to bear much fruit to his glory (John 15:8). All of these characteristics will be the desires of the inner new creation, and Paul urges believers to submit the flesh to these inner holy longings and to manifest these virtues as a regular pattern of life. These qualities are not foreign to our nature but to what we desire, so that, as our will submits to the Word and Spirit, the qualities become reality.

In the present text (12:9-21), Paul gives some twenty-five distinct but closely related exhortations. Any believer who honestly appraises his life by these standards cannot help being convicted of falling far short of the perfection the inner person desires. On the other hand, however, the believer who is walking in the Spirit will see the Spirit working out these precepts in his life to a greater and greater extent. An honest look at our lives in light of these precepts will bring conviction about our failure to keep some of them and confidence about our success in keeping others. Where we fall short, we should ask the Lord’s help. Where we have been faithful, we should give Him thanks and praise.

The specific exhortations fall under four general categories or phases, which form an ever-increasing circle, as it were, that expands from personal attitudes to the widest social applications. They are: personal duties (v. 9); family duties (vv. 10-13); duty to other people in general (vv. 14-16); and duty to those who are avowed personal enemies (vv. 17-21).

Personal Duties

Let love be without hypocrisy. Abhor what is evil; cling to what is good.  (12:9)

In one of several triplets (see also vv. 11, 12, 16), Paul mentions three personal duties of supernatural living.

LOVE WITHOUT HYPOCRISY (12:9A)

The first duty is, Let love be without hypocrisy. The greatest virtue of the Christian life is love. The use of agapeô (love) was rare in pagan Greek literature, doubtless because the concept it represented—unselfish, self-giving, willful devotion—was so uncommon in that culture it was even ridiculed and despised as a sign of weakness. But in the New Testament it is proclaimed as the supreme virtue, the virtue under which all others are subsumed. Agapeô love centers on the needs and welfare of the one loved and will pay whatever personal price is necessary to meet those needs and foster that welfare.

Love is more important to a Christian than any spiritual gift he may have. “But now abide faith, hope, love, these three,” Paul explained to the Corinthian believers, “but the greatest of these is love” (1 Cor. 13:13; cf. 12:31). It is therefore not surprising that the first “fruit of the Spirit is love” (Gal. 5:22) and that it is by our love for our fellow believers that “all men will know that [we are Jesus’] disciples” (John 13:35). In behalf of the Thessalonian believers, Paul prayed, “May the Lord cause you to increase and abound in love for one another” (1 Thess. 3:12; cf. 1 John 3:18). Suffering “much endurance, in afflictions, in hardships, in distresses, in beatings, in imprisonments, in tumults, in labors, in sleeplessness, in hunger,” Paul himself served the Lord’s people “in the Holy Spirit, in genuine love” (2 Cor. 6:4-6).

It is that same unfeigned love of one another that Peter admonishes all believers to exhibit: “Since you have in obedience to the truth purified your souls for a sincere love of the brethren, fervently love one another from the heart” (1 Pet. 1:22). Later in the same letter, the apostle repeats the command: “Above all, keep fervent in your love for one another, because love covers a multitude of sins” (1 Pet. 4:8).

The love of which Paul, Peter, and John speak is genuine love, the sincere and fervent love that is completely without hypocrisy and untainted by self-centeredness. Christian love is pure, guileless, and unaffected.

Hypocrisy is the antithesis of and completely incompatible with agapeô love. The two cannot coexist. Hypocrisy is exceeded in evil only by unbelief. The consummate hypocrite in Scripture, Judas, was also the consummate egoist. He feigned devotion to Jesus to achieve his own selfish purposes. His hypocrisy
was unmasked and his self-centeredness was made evident when he betrayed Jesus for the thirty pieces of silver. Commenting on this verse in Romans, the theologian John Murray writes, “If love is the sum of virtue and hypocrisy is the epitome of vice, what a contradiction to bring the two together.”

Duty to the Family of God

Be devoted to one another in brotherly love; give preference to one another in honor; not lagging behind in diligence, fervent in spirit, serving the Lord; rejoicing in hope, persevering in tribulation, devoted to prayer, contributing to the needs of the saints, practicing hospitality. (12:10-13)

The second phase of supernatural living concerns a wider dimension—largely pertaining to the believer’s duty to fellow members in the family of God.

BE DEVOTED IN BROTHERLY LOVE (12:10A)

Be devoted to and brotherly love carry synonymous ideas. Devoted translates philostorgos, a compound of philos (friend, friendly; friendship love) and storgeô (natural family love, which is not based on
personal attraction or desirability). Brotherly love translates philadelphia, another compound—phileoô (to have tender affection) and adelphos (brother). We are to have a loving filial affection for one another in the family of God.

Devoted … brotherly love is one of the marks by which the world will know that we belong to Christ. “By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another” (John 13:35). This love is not optional for believers. It not only is required but is inescapable, because “whoever loves the Father loves the child born of Him” (1 John 5:1). In fact, as John has just declared, “If someone says, ‘I love God,’ and hates his brother, he is a liar; for the one who does not love his brother whom he has seen, cannot love God whom he has not seen” (4:20).

Brotherly love reflects the nature of Christians. That is why Paul could say, “Now as to the love of the brethren, you have no need for anyone to write to you, for you yourselves are taught by God to love one another” (1 Thess. 4:9). Being “taught by God,” the true child of God knows intuitively that he is to love his spiritual brothers and sisters. For the very reason that God is our common heavenly Father, love for each other should be as natural and normal as family members’ affectionate love for each other.

The apostle John forcefully affirms that truth. “The one who says he is in the light and yet hates his brother is in the darkness until now. The one who loves his brother abides in the light and there is no cause for stumbling in him. But the one who hates his brother is in the darkness and walks in the darkness, and does not know where he is going because the darkness has blinded his eyes” (1 John 2:9-11). In the next chapter the apostle uses even stronger words: “By this the children of God and the children of the devil are obvious: anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother … But whoever has the world’s goods, and beholds his brother in need and closes his heart against him, how does the love of God abide in him? Little children, let us not love with word or with tongue, but in deed and truth. We shall know by this that we are of the truth, and shall assure our heart before Him” (1 John 3:10, 17-19).

PREFER ONE ANOTHER IN HONOR (12:10B)

If we are truly “devoted to one another in brotherly love,” it almost goes without saying that we will give preference to one another in honor. The virtue here is humility, not thinking more highly of ourselves than we ought to think (Rom. 12:3). It is doing “nothing from selfishness or empty conceit, but with humility of mind,” regarding “one another as more important than” oneself (Phil. 2:3).

Proeôgeomai (give preference) has the basic meaning of going before, or leading. But the idea here is not that of putting ourselves before others in regard to importance or worth but the very opposite idea of giving honor to fellow believers by putting them first.

To honor is not to flatter, to give hypocritical praise in hope of having the compliment returned or of gaining favor with the one honored. Again, the very opposite is in mind. To honor is to show genuine appreciation and admiration for one another in the family of God. We are to be quick to show respect, quick to acknowledge the accomplishments of others, quick to demonstrate genuine love by not being jealous or envious, which have no part in love, whether agapeô or philadelphia.

Do Not Lag in Diligence (12:11a)

Not lagging behind in diligence could be rendered, “not lazy in zeal and intensity.” A few verses earlier, Paul declares that the Christian who has the gift of ruling, or leading, should exercise it with diligence (v. 8).

In the context of Romans 12, diligence refers to whatever believers do in their supernatural living. Whatever is worth doing in the Lord’s service is worth doing with enthusiasm and care. Jesus told His disciples that He “must work the works of Him who sent Me, as long as it is day; night is coming, when no man can work” (John 9:4). The Lord knew His time of ministry was limited and that every moment in His Father’s service on earth should count for the most possible. Paul admonished believers in the Galatian churches: “So then, while we have opportunity, let us do good to all men, and especially to those who are of the household of the faith” (Gal. 6:10; cf. 2 Thess. 3:13).

There is no room for sloth and indolence in the Lord’s work. “Whatever your hand finds to do,” Solomon counseled, “verily, do it with all your might; for there is no activity or planning or knowledge or wisdom in Sheol [the grave]” (Eccles. 9:10). Whatever we do for the Lord must be done in this present life.

Slothfulness in Christian living not only prevents good from being done but allows evil to prosper. “Therefore be careful how you walk,” Paul charged the Ephesians, “not as unwise men, but as wise, making the most of your time, because the days are evil” (Eph. 5:15-16). “He also who is slack in his work is brother to him who destroys” (Prov. 18:9). For weeds to prosper, the gardener need only leave the garden alone.

The Lord rewards those who serve Him with diligence. “God is not unjust so as to forget your work and the love which you have shown toward His name, in having ministered and in still ministering to the saints. And we desire that each one of you show the same diligence so as to realize the full assurance of hope until the end, that you may not be sluggish, but imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises” (Heb. 6:10-12).

BE FERVENT IN SPIRIT (12:11B)

Whereas diligence pertains mainly to action, being fervent in spirit pertains to attitude. Literally, zeoô means to boil and metaphorically to be fervent. The idea here is not of being overheated to the point of boiling over and out of control but, like a steam engine, of having sufficient heat to produce the energy necessary to get the work done. That principle is reflected in the life of Henry Martyn, the tireless missionary to India, whose heart’s desire was to “burn out for God.”

One of the oldest blights on earth is lack of enthusiasm. Most people could make a sizable list of their failures that were simply casualties to indifference and lack of commitment. Fervency requires resolve and persistence, not mere good intention. “Let us not lose heart in doing good,” Paul admonishes, “for in due time we shall reap if we do not grow weary” (Gal. 6:9).

Even before he had a full understanding of the gospel, Apollos was “fervent in spirit, … speaking and teaching accurately the things concerning Jesus” (Acts 18:25). But no believer in the early church was more fervent in spirit, more indefatigable in the work of the Lord than Paul himself. “Therefore I run in such a way, as not without aim,” he said; “I box in such a way, as not beating the air” (1 Cor. 9:26); “And for this purpose also I labor” (Col. 1:29).

SERVE THE LORD (12:11C)

Like fervency in spirit, serving the Lord has to do with perspective and priority. Everything we do should, first of all, be consistent with God’s Word and, second, be truly in His service and to His glory. Strict devotion to the Lord would eliminate a great deal of fruitless church activity.

Paul never lost sight of that foundational mission. He begins this letter with the affirmation that he served God “in [his] spirit in the preaching of the gospel of His Son” (Rom. 1:9).

In Romans 12, Paul uses three different words to describe Christian service. In verse 1 he uses latreia, which is translated, “service of worship,” and emphasizes reverential awe. The second word is diakonia, which pertains to practical service. In verse 11, he uses douleuoô, which refers to the service of a bond-slave, whose very reason for existence is to do his master’s will.

Above all else, Paul considered himself a bond-slave of Jesus Christ. It is with that description that he first identifies himself in this letter (Rom. 1:1), as well as in Philippians (1:1) and Titus (1:1).

Yet we do not serve the Lord in our own power any more than we came to Him in our own power. Our supreme purpose is to serve the Lord Jesus Christ, and our power to fulfill that service is from Him. “For this purpose also I labor,” Paul testified, “striving according to His power, which mightily works within me” (Col. 1:29).

Rejoice in Hope (12:12a)

Living the supernatural life inevitably brings opposition from the world and sometimes even sparks resentment by fellow Christians. Even after years of faithful service to the Lord, some see few, if any, apparent results from their labors. Without hope we could never survive. “For in hope we have been saved,” Paul has already explained, “but hope that is seen is not hope; for why does one also hope for what he sees? But if we hope for what we do not see, with perseverance we wait eagerly for it” (Rom. 8:24-25).

Rejoicing in that hope, we know that, if we are “steadfast, immovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord,” our “toil is not in vain” (1 Cor. 15:58). We can therefore look forward to one day hearing, “Well done, good and faithful servant” (Matt. 25:21). We know that “in the future there is laid up for [us] the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will award to [us] on that day; and … to all who have loved His appearing” (2 Tim. 4:8).

Persevere in Tribulation (12:12b)

It is because we can rejoice in hope that we also can persevere in tribulation, whatever its form or severity. Because we have perfect assurance concerning the ultimate outcome of our lives, we are able to persist against any obstacle and endure any suffering. That is why Paul could declare with perfect confidence that “we exult in hope of the glory of God. And not only this, but we also exult in our tribulations, knowing that tribulation brings about perseverance; and perseverance, proven character; and proven character, hope; and hope does not disappoint, because the love of God has been poured out within our hearts through the Holy Spirit who was given to us” (Rom. 5:2-5).

BE DEVOTED TO PRAYER (12:12C)

Doubtless one of the reasons the Lord allows His children to go through tribulation is to drive them to Himself. The believer who has the strength to persevere in trials, afflictions, adversity, and misfortune—sometimes even
deprivation and destitution—will pray more than occasionally. He will be devoted to prayer, in communion with his Lord as a constant part of his life. So should we all be, no matter what the circumstances of our lives.

Proskartereoô (devoted) means literally to be strong toward something, and it also carries the ideas of steadfast and unwavering. It was with such devoted … prayer that early Christians worshiped, both before and after the descent of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost (Acts 1:14; 2:42). It was to enable the apostles to devote themselves “to prayer, and to the ministry of the word” (Acts 6:4) that deacons were first appointed in the church.

Devoted, steadfast prayer should be as continual a part of a Christian’s spiritual life as breathing is a part of his physical life. The victorious Christian prays “with the spirit and … with the mind” (1 Cor. 14:15). As he prays with his own spirit, he also prays “in the Holy Spirit” (Jude 20; cf. Eph. 6:18). He prays “without ceasing” (1 Thess. 5:17). Paul therefore admonished Timothy to have “the men in every place to pray, lifting up holy hands” (1 Tim. 2:8).

CONTRIBUTE TO THE NEEDS OF THE SAINTS (12:13A)

The next two principles Paul mentions in this list seem rather mundane. But they are qualities that the Lord personified during His earthly ministry and for which Paul himself was lovingly known. The flow of the supernatural life is outward, not inward, and meeting the needs of fellow believers is more important
than meeting our own.

Contributing is from koinoôneoô, which means to share in, or share with, and the noun koinoônia is often translated “fellowship” or “communion.” The basic meaning is that of commonality or partnership, which involves mutual sharing. The spirit of sharing was immediately evident in the early church, as believers after Pentecost “were continually devoting themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to fellowship [koinoônia], to the breaking of bread and prayer … And all those who had believed were together, and had all things in common [koina]” (Acts 2:42, 44; cf. 4:32). Peter used that term in speaking of our sharing [koinoôneoô] in “the sufferings of Christ” (1 Pet. 4:13).

But because the emphasis in the present text is on the giving side of sharing, the term is here rendered contributing. Paul also used a form of that word in the same sense when he admonished Timothy to “instruct those who are rich in this present world … to be generous and ready to share [koinoônikos]” (1 Tim. 6:17-18). In the eyes of society, we rightfully own certain things, but before the Lord we own nothing. We are simply stewards of what He has blessed us with. And one of our most important responsibilities as His stewards is using our personal resources to contribute to the needs of the saints, our brothers and sisters in Christ

In the parable of the Good Samaritan, Jesus made clear that we have a responsibility, to the best of our ability, to help anyone in need whom we encounter. But we have a still greater responsibility to serve fellow Christians.
“So then, while we have opportunity,” Paul says, “let us do good to all men, and especially to those who are of the household of the faith” (Gal. 6:10).

Practice Hospitality (12:13b)

The last responsibility to fellow believers that Paul mentions in this list is that of practicing hospitality. The literal meaning of that phrase in the Greek is, “pursuing the love of strangers.” In other words, we not only are to meet the needs of those people, believers and unbelievers, who come across our paths but are to look for opportunities to help. “Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers,” the writer of Hebrews admonishes us, “for by this some have entertained angels without knowing it” (Heb. 13:2).

In our text, Paul is speaking to all believers, but he also makes clear that leaders in the church should set an example by their own hospitality. Elders are to be “hospitable, loving what is good, sensible, just, devout, self-controlled” (Titus 1:8).

As with all virtues, this one must be exercised without hypocrisy or self-interest. Jesus’ admonition to His Pharisee host applies to all of His followers: “When you give a luncheon or a dinner, do not invite your friends or your brothers or your relatives or rich neighbors, lest they also invite you in return, and repayment come to you. But when you give a reception, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed, since they do not have the means to repay you; for you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous” (Luke 14:12-14).

Because inns in New Testament times were scarce, expensive, and often dangerous, Christian families commonly opened their homes to believers who passed through their towns. Unlike Paul, who insisted on paying for most of his own expenses, most itinerant preachers and teachers relied entirely on the support of fellow Christians. John commended Gaius for his generosity in this regard: “Beloved, you are acting faithfully in whatever you accomplish for the brethren, and especially when they are strangers; and they bear witness to your love before the church; and you will do well to send them on their way in a manner worthy of God. For they went out for the sake of the Name, accepting nothing from the Gentiles. Therefore we ought to support such men, that we may be fellow workers with the truth” (3 John 5-8).

We are to “be hospitable to one another without complaint,” Peter admonishes (1 Pet. 4:9). That is, we should look upon our hospitality as a happy privilege, not a drudging duty. Onesiphorus demonstrated that sort of beneficence in ministering to Paul, about whom the apostle wrote, “He often refreshed me, and was not ashamed of my chains; but when he was in Rome, he eagerly searched for me, and found me—the Lord grant to him to find mercy from the Lord on that day—and you know very well what services he rendered at Ephesus” (2 Tim. 1:16-18).

Love Or Death –1 John 3:11-24

(1 John 3:14-18 NIV)  We know that we have passed from death to life, because we love our brothers. Anyone who does not love remains in death. {15} Anyone who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life in him. {16} This is how we know what love is: Jesus Christ laid down his life for us. And we ought to lay down our lives for our brothers. {17} If anyone has material possessions and sees his brother in need but has no pity on him, how can the love of God be in him? {18} Dear children, let us not love with words or tongue but with actions and in truth.

John’s letter has been compared to a spiral staircase because he keeps returning to the same three topics: love, obedience, and truth. Though these themes recur, it is not true that they are merely repetitious. Each time we return to a topic, we look at it from a different point of view and are taken more deeply into it.

We have already learned about our love for other believers—“the brethren” (1 John 2:7-11)—but the emphasis in 1 John 2 was on fellowship. A believer who is “walking in the light” will evidence that fact by loving the brethren. In our present section, the emphasis is on his relationship with other believers.

Christians love one another because they have all been born of God, which makes them all brothers and sisters in Christ.

Obedience and love are both evidences of sonship and brotherhood. We have been reminded that a true child of God practices righteousness (1 John 3:1-10), and now we shall look into the matter of love for the brethren (1 John 3:11-24). This truth is first stated in the negative—”Whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother” (1 John 3:10).

A striking difference should be noted between the earlier and the present treatment of love for the brethren. In the section on fellowship (1 John 2:7-11), we are told that loving the brethren is a matter of light and darkness. If we do not love one another, we cannot walk in the light, no matter how loud our profession. But in this section (1 John 3:11-24) on brotherhood, the epistle probes much deeper. We are told that loving the brethren is a matter of life and death. “He that loveth not his brother abideth in death” (1 John 3:14).

When it comes to this matter of love, there are four possible “levels of relationship,” so to speak, on which a person may live: murder (1 John 3:11-12), hatred (1 John 3:13-15), indifference (1 John 3:16-17), and Christian compassion (1 John 3:18-24).

The first two are not Christian at all, the third is less than Christian, and only the last is compatible with true Christian love.

Murder (1 John 3:11-12)

Murder, of course, is the lowest level on which one may live in relationship to someone else. It is the level on which Satan himself exists. The devil was a murderer from the beginning of his fallen career (John 8:44), but Christians have heard, from the beginning of their experience, that they are to “love one another.” John emphasizes origins: “Go back to the beginning.” If our spiritual experience originates with the Father, we must love one another. But if it originates with Satan, we will hate one another. “Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning” (1 John 2:24).

Cain is an example of a life of hatred; we find the record in Genesis 4:1-16. It is important to note that Cain and Abel, being brothers, had the same parents, and they both brought sacrifices to God. Cain is not presented as an atheist; he is presented as a worshiper. And this is the point: children of the devil masquerade as true believers. They attend religious gatherings, as Cain did. They may even bring offerings. But these actions in themselves are not valid proof that a man is born of God. The real test is his love for the brethren—and here Cain failed.

Every man has a “spiritual lineage” as well as a physical, and Cain’s “spiritual father” was the devil. This does not mean, of course, that Satan literally fathered Cain. It means, rather, that Cain’s attitudes and actions originated with Satan. Cain was a murderer and a liar like Satan (John 8:44). He murdered his brother, and then he lied about it. “And the Lord said unto Cain, ‘Where is Abel thy brother?’ And he said, ‘I know not’” (Gen. 4:9).

In contrast to this, God is love (1 John 4:8) and truth (John 14:6; 1 John 5:6); therefore, those who belong to God’s family practice love and truth.

The difference between Cain’s offering and Abel’s offering was faith (Heb. 11:4), and faith is always based on the revelation God has given (Rom. 10:17). It seems clear that God must have given definite instructions concerning how He was to be worshiped. Cain rejected God’s Word and decided to worship in his own way. This shows his relationship to Satan, for Satan is always interested in turning people away from the revealed will of God. The devil’s “Yea, hath God said?” (Gen. 3:1) was the beginning of trouble for Cain’s parents and for all mankind since.

We are not told by what outward sign the Lord accepted Abel’s sacrifice and rejected Cain’s. It may be that He sent fire from heaven to consume Abel’s sacrifice of an animal and its blood. But we are told the results: Abel went away from the altar with God’s witness of acceptance in his heart, but Cain went away angry and disappointed (Gen. 4:4-6). God warned Cain that sin was crouching at the door like a dangerous beast (Gen. 4:7) but promised that if Cain would obey God, he, like Abel, would enjoy peace.

Instead of heeding God’s warning, Cain listened to Satan’s voice and plotted to kill his brother. His envy had turned to anger and hatred. He knew that he was evil and that his brother was righteous. Rather than repent, as God commanded him to do, he decided to destroy his brother.

Centuries later, the Pharisees did the same thing to Jesus (Mark 15:9-10), and Jesus called them too children of the devil (John 8:44).

Cain’s attitude represents the attitude of the present world system (1 John 3:13). The world hates Christ (John 15:18-25) for the same reason Cain hated Abel: Christ shows up the world’s sin and reveals its true nature. When the world, like Cain, comes face-to-face with reality and truth, it can make only one of two decisions: repent and change, or destroy the one who is exposing it.

Satan is the “prince of this world” (John 14:30), and he controls it through murder and lies. How horrible to live on the same level as Satan!

A hunter took refuge in a cave during a rainstorm. After he had dried out a bit, he decided to investigate his temporary home and turned on his flashlight. Imagine his surprise when he discovered he was sharing the cave with an assortment of spiders, lizards, and snakes! His exit was a fast one.

If the unsaved world could only see, it would realize that it is living on the low level of murder and lies, surrounded by that old serpent Satan and all his demonic armies. Like Cain, the people of the world try to cover up their true nature with religious rites; but they lack faith in God’s Word. People who continue to live on this level will eventually be cast into outer darkness with Satan to suffer apart from God forever.

Hatred (1 John 3:13-15)

At this point, you are probably thinking, “But I have never murdered anyone!” And to this statement, God replies, “Yes, but remember that to a Christian hatred is the same as murder” (1 John 3:15; cf. Matt. 5:22). The only difference between Level 1 and Level 2 is the outward act of taking life. The inward intent is the same.

A visitor at the zoo was chatting with the keeper of the lion house. “I have a cat at home,” said the visitor, “and your lions act just like my cat. Look at them sleeping so peacefully! It seems a shame that you have to put those beautiful creatures behind bars.”“My friend,” the keeper laughed, “these may look like your cat, but their disposition is radically different. There’s murder in their hearts. You’d better be glad the bars are there.”

The only reason some people have never actually murdered anyone is because of the “bars” that have been put up: the fear of arrest and shame, the penalties of the law, and the possibility of death. But we are going to be judged by “the law of liberty” (James 2:12). The question is not so much, “What did you do?” but “What did you want to do? What would you have done if you had been at liberty to do as you pleased?” This is why Jesus equates hatred with murder (Matt. 5:21-26) and lust with adultery (Matt. 5:27-30).

This does not mean, of course, that hatred in the heart does the same amount of damage, or involves the same degree of guilt, as actual murder. Your neighbor would rather you hate him than kill him! But in God’s sight, hatred is the moral equivalent of murder, and if left unbridled it leads to murder. A Christian has passed from death to life (John 5:24), and the proof of this is that he loves the brethren. When he belonged to the world system, he hated God’s people; but now that he belongs to God, he loves them.

These verses (1 John 3:14-15), like those that deal with habitual sin in a believer (1 John 1:5-2:6), concern a settled habit of life: a believer is in the practice of loving the brethren, even though on occasion he may be angry with a brother (Matt. 5:22-24). Occasional incidents of anger do not nullify the principle. If anything, they prove it true, because a believer out of fellowship with his fellow Christians is a miserable person! His feelings make clear to him that something is wrong.

Notice another fact: we are not told that murderers cannot be saved. The Apostle Paul himself took a hand in the stoning of Stephen (Acts 7:57-60) and admitted that his vote helped to put innocent people to death (Acts 26:9-11; 1 Tim. 1:12-15). But in His grace God saved Paul.

The issue here is not whether a murderer can become a Christian, but whether a man can continue being a murderer and still be a Christian. The answer is no. “And ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him” (1 John 3:15). The murderer did not once have eternal life and then lose it; he never had eternal life at all.

The fact that you have never actually murdered anyone should not make you proud or complacent. Have you ever harbored hatred in your heart?

Hatred does the hater far more damage than it does anyone else (Matt. 5:21-26). Jesus said that anger put a man in danger of facing the local court. Calling a brother an “empty-headed fool” put him in danger of the Sanhedrin, the highest Jewish council. But calling him a “cursed fool” put him in danger of eternal judgment in hell. Hatred that is not confessed and forsaken actually puts a man into a spiritual and emotional prison! (Matt. 5:25)

The antidote for hatred is love. “Hateful and hating one another” is the normal experience of an unsaved person (Titus 3:3). But when a hateful heart opens to Jesus Christ, it becomes a loving heart. Then instead of wanting to “murder” others through hatred, one wants to love them and share with them the message of eternal life.

Indifference (1 John 3:16-17)

But the test of Christian love is not simply failure to do evil to others. Love also involves doing them good. Christian love is both positive and negative. “Cease to do evil; learn to do well” (Isa. 1:16-17).

Cain is our example of false love; Christ is the example of true Christian love. Jesus gave His life for us that we may experience truth. Every Christian knows John 3:16, but how many of us pay much attention to 1 John 3:16? It is wonderful to experience the blessing of John 3:16; but it is even more wonderful to share that experience by obeying 1 John 3:16: Christ laid down life for us, and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren.

Christian love involves sacrifice and service. Christ did not simply talk about His love; He died to prove it (Rom. 5:6-10). Jesus was not killed as a martyr; He willingly laid down His life (John 10:11-18; 15:13). “Self-preservation” is the first law of physical life, but “self-sacrifice” is the first law of spiritual life.

But God does not ask us to lay down our lives. He simply asks us to help a brother in need. John wisely turns from “the brethren” in 1 John 3:16 to the singular, “his brother,” in 1 John 3:17.

It is easy for us to talk about “loving the brethren” and to neglect to help a single other believer. Christian love is personal and active.

This is what Jesus had in mind in the Parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37). A lawyer wanted to talk about an abstract subject: “Who is my neighbor?” But Jesus focused attention on one man in need, and changed the question to, “To whom can I be a neighbor?”

A man does not have to murder in order to sin; hatred is murder in his heart. But a man need not even hate his brother to be guilty of sin. All he has to do is ignore him, or be indifferent toward his needs. A believer who has material goods and can relieve his brother’s needs ought to do it. To “close the door of his heart” on his brother is a kind of murder!

If I am going to help my brother, I must meet three conditions. First, I must have the means necessary to meet his need. Second, I must know that the need exists. Third, I must be loving enough to want to share.

A believer who is too poor to help, or who is ignorant of his brother’s need, is not condemned. But a believer who hardens his heart against his needy brother is condemned. One reason Christians should work is so that they may be able “to give to him that needeth” (Eph. 4:28).

In these days of multiplied social agencies, it is easy for Christians to forget their obligations. “So then, while we have opportunity, let us do good to all men, and especially to those who are of the household of the faith” (Gal. 6:10, nasb).

This “doing good” need not be in terms of money or material supplies. It may include personal service and the giving of oneself to others. There are many individuals in our churches who lack love and would welcome friendship.

If we want to experience and enjoy the love of God in our own hearts, we must love others, even to the point of sacrifice. Being indifferent to a brother’s needs means robbing ourselves of what we need even more: the love of God in our hearts. It is a matter of love or death!

Christian Love (1 John 3:18-24)

True Christian love means loving in deed and in truth. The opposite of “in deed” is “in word,” and the opposite of “in truth” is “in tongue.” Here is an example of love “in word”:

“If a brother or sister is without clothing and in need of daily food, and one of you says to them, ‘Go in peace, be warmed and be filled’; and yet you do not give them what is necessary for their body, what use is that?” (James 2:15-16, nasb)

To love “in word” means simply to talk about a need, but to love “in deed” means to do something about meeting it. You may think, because you have discussed a need, or even prayed about it, that you have done your duty, but love involves more than words—it calls for sacrificial deeds.

To love “in tongue” is the opposite of to love “in truth.” It means to love insincerely. To love “in truth” means to love a person genuinely, from the heart and not just from the tongue. People are attracted by genuine love, but repelled by the artificial variety. One reason why sinners were attracted to Jesus (Luke 15:1-2) was because they were sure He loved them sincerely.

“But does it not cost a great deal for the believer to exercise this kind of love?”

Yes, it does. It cost Jesus Christ His life. But the wonderful benefits that come to you as by-products of this love more than compensate for any sacrifice you make. To be sure, you do not love others because you want to get something in return, but the Bible principle, “Give and it shall be given unto you” (Luke 6:38), applies to love as well as to money.

John names three wonderful blessings that will come to a believer who practices Christian love.

Assurance (vv. 19-20).

A believer’s relationship with others affects His relationship with God. A man who is not right with his brother should go settle the matter before he offers his sacrifice on the altar (cf. Matt. 5:23-24). A Christian who practices love grows in his understanding of God’s truth and enjoys a heart filled with confidence before God.

A “condemning heart” is one that robs a believer of peace. An “accusing conscience” is another way to describe it. Sometimes the heart accuses us wrongly, because it “is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked; who can know it?” (Jer. 17:9) The answer to that question is, “God knows the heart!” More than one Christian has accused himself falsely, or been harder on himself than necessary; but God will never make such a mistake. A Christian who walks in love has a heart open to God (“God is love”) and knows that God never judges wrongly.

John may have remembered two incidents from Jesus’ life on earth that illustrate this important principle. When Jesus visited Bethany, He stayed at the home of Mary and Martha (Luke 10:38-42). Martha was busy preparing the meal, but Mary sat at His feet and listened to Him teach. Martha criticized both Mary and Jesus, but Jesus knew Mary’s heart and defended her.

The Apostle Peter wept bitterly after he had denied his Lord, and no doubt he was filled with remorse and repentance for his sin. But Jesus knew that Peter had repented, and after His resurrection the Lord sent a special message (Mark 16:7) to Peter that must have assured the hot-headed fisherman that he was forgiven. Peter’s heart may have condemned him, for he knew he had denied the Lord three times, but God was greater than his heart. Jesus, knowing all things, gave Peter just the assurance he needed.

Be careful lest the devil accuse you and rob you of your confidence (Rev. 12:10). Once you confess your sin and it is forgiven, you need not allow it to accuse you anymore. Peter was able to face the Jews and say, “But ye denied the Holy One and the Just!” (Acts 3:14) because his own sin of denying Christ had been taken care of and was forgiven and forgotten.

No Christian should treat sin lightly, but no Christian should be harder on himself than God is. There is a morbid kind of self-examination and self-condemnation that is not spiritual. If you are practicing genuine love for the brethren, your heart must be right before God, for the Holy Spirit would not “shed abroad” His love in you if there were habitual sin in your heart. When you grieve the Spirit, you “turn off” the supply of God’s love (Eph. 4:30-5:2).

Answered prayer (vv. 21-22).

Love for the brethren produces confidence toward God, and confidence toward God gives you boldness in asking for what you need. This does not mean that you earn answers to prayer by loving the brethren. Rather, it means that your love for the brethren proves that you are living in the will of God where God can answer your prayer. “And whatsoever we ask, we receive of Him, because we keep His commandments” (1 John 3:22). Love is the fulfilling of God’s Law (Rom. 13:8-10); therefore, when you love the brethren, you are obeying His commandments and He is able to answer your requests.

A believer’s relationship to the brethren cannot be divorced from his prayer life. If husbands and wives are not obeying God’s Word, for example, their prayers will be hindered (1 Peter 3:7).

One great secret of answered prayer is obedience, and the secret of obedience is love. “If ye love Me, keep My commandments” (John 14:15). “If ye abide in Me, and My words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you. . . . If ye keep My commandments, ye shall abide in My love” (John 15:7, 10).

It is possible, of course, to keep God’s commandments in a spirit of fear or servitude rather than in a spirit of love. This was the sin of the elder brother in the Parable of the Prodigal Son (Luke 15:24-32). A believer should keep His Father’s commandments because this pleases Him. A Christian who lives to please God will discover that God finds ways to please His child. “Delight thyself also in the Lord, and He shall give thee the desires of thine heart” (Ps. 37:4). When our delight is in the love of God, our desires will be in the will of God.

Abiding (vv. 23-24).

When a scribe asked Jesus to name the greatest commandment, He replied, “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God.” Then He added a second commandment: “Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself” (Matt. 22:34-40). But God also gives us one commandment that takes in both God and man: “Believe in the name of His Son Jesus Christ, and love one another” (1 John 3:23, nasb). Faith toward God and love toward man sum up a Christian’s obligations. Christianity is “faith which worketh by love” (Gal. 5:6).

Faith toward God and love toward men are two sides of the same coin. It is easy to emphasize faith—correct doctrine—and to neglect love. On the other hand, some say doctrine is not important and that love is our main responsibility. Both doctrine and love are important. When a person is justified by faith, he should know that the love of God is being shed abroad in his heart (Rom. 5:1-5).

“Abiding in Christ” is a key experience for a believer who wants to have confidence toward God and enjoy answers to prayer. Jesus, in His message to the disciples in the Upper Room (John 15:1-14) illustrated “abiding.” He compared His followers to the branches of a vine. So long as the branch draws its strength from the vine, it produces fruit. But if it separates itself from the vine, it withers and dies.

Jesus was not talking about salvation; He was talking about fruit-bearing. The instant a sinner trusts Christ, he enters into union with Christ; but maintaining communion is a moment-by-moment responsibility. Abiding depends on our obeying His Word and keeping clean (John 15:3, 10).

As we have seen, when a believer walks in love, he finds it easy to obey God, and therefore he maintains a close communion with God. “If a man love Me, he will keep My words; and My Father will love him, and We will come unto him and make Our abode with him” (John 14:23).

The Holy Spirit is mentioned by name in 1 John for the first time in 3:24. John introduced us to the Holy One (1 John 2:20) with emphasis on the Spirit’s anointing and teaching ministry. (This parallels John 14:26; 16:13-14.) But the Holy One is also the abiding Spirit (1 John 3:24; 4:13). When a believer obeys God and loves the brethren, the indwelling Holy Spirit gives him peace and confidence. The Holy Spirit abides with him forever (John 14:16), but when the Spirit is grieved, He withdraws His blessings.

The Holy Spirit is also the attesting Spirit (1 John 4:1-6), giving witness to those who are truly God’s children. When a believer is abiding in Christ, the Spirit guides him and warns him of false spirits that would lead him astray.

He is also the authenticating Spirit (1 John 5:6-8), bearing witness to the person and work of Jesus Christ. This witness of the Spirit is mentioned in Romans 8:14-16.

Each member of the Triune Godhead is involved in the “love life” of a believer. God the Father commands us to love one another, God the Son gave His life on the cross, the supreme example of love. And God the Holy Spirit lives within us to provide the love we need (Rom. 5:5). To abide in love is to abide in God, and to abide in God is to abide in love. Christian love is not something we “work up” when we need it. Christian love is “shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Spirit,” and this is your constant experience as you abide in Christ.

There are four levels on which a person may live. He may choose the lowest level—Satan’s level—and practice murder. Murderers “have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone, which is the second death” (Rev. 21:8).

Or, a person may choose the next level—hatred. But hatred, in God’s sight, is the same as murder. A man who lives with hatred is slowly killing himself, not the other person! Psychiatrists warn that malice and hatred cause all kinds of physical and emotional problems. In fact, one specialist has entitled his book Love or Perish!

The third level—indifference—is far better than the first two, because the first two are not Christian at all. A man who has constant hatred in his heart, or who habitually murders, proves he has never been born of God. But it is possible to be a Christian and be indifferent to the needs of others.

A man who murders belongs to the devil, like Cain. A man who hates belongs to the world (1 John 3:13), which is under Satan’s control. But a Christian who is indifferent is living for the flesh, which serves Satan’s purposes.

The only happy, holy way to live is on the highest level, the level of Christian love. This is the life of joy and liberty, the life of answered prayer. It assures you confidence and courage in spite of the difficulties of life.

Dr. Rene Spitz of New York made a study of children in foundling homes to determine what effect love and neglect had on them. The survey proved that children who were neglected and unloved were much slower in their development, and some of them even died. Even in a physical sense, love is the very atmosphere of life and growth.

It is even more so in the spiritual sense. In fact, it is a matter of love or death.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 14, 2016 in Doctrine

 

Talking someone into being bapatized?


Baptism-2014How many of us have heard folks say, “They just won’t be baptized. What can we do to persuade them to be baptized?”

These statements seem to overlook the greatest challenge of salvation for most folks.

Have you ever seen one who believed in the Lord (John 8:24), was not ashamed, but willing to confess Him before others, (Matt. 10:32; John 12:42-43) had repented of their sins, (Luke 13:3, Acts 26:20, II Cor. 7:10), and not be baptized?

Repentance is a change which begins in the mind which changes lives. In Acts 19 the city of Ephesus, the home of the Temple of Diana and capitol of worship to this goddess, was presented with the Gospel of Jesus.

For the pagans to become Christians, what changes did “repentance” demand? In verse 19 they brought their books of magic into one pile and burned them. The value was 50,000 pieces of silver. This was a considerably large sum of money. Books were valuable possessions and very expensive in those days. Remember Jesus was betrayed for 30 pieces of silver (Matt. 2:15), which brings their sacrifice of burning their books into perspective.

Instead of selling them and advocating false doctrine, the repentance of the Ephesians led them to suffer financial loss.

A second sign of their repentance was the fear their actions brought upon Demetrius the silversmith. He was in the business of selling shrines of the goddess Diana. He realized penitent Christians changed their behavior. Their change in behavior would mean they would no longer buy his shrines.

The more Christianity spread (the more people repented) the less business he would have! He started a riot, hoping to defeat Christianity. Some are never willing to repent, others give up all!

Jonathan Winchester is a fine young missionary we worked with in El Salvador. He wrote me this note: “We had some good and sad results. The area where we worked was one of the poorest and most dangerous areas in Lea, Peru. One woman had decided to be baptized, and had changed into the baptismal robe, but then decided she could not. She knew that repentance was necessary. She told us that her only way of providing for her children was to go out and steal people’s wallets, and she knew that she was not going to stop.”

Should she have been advised to be baptized anyway? What would God say — repent or perish (Luke 13:3).

Folks do not need to be “talked into baptism.” What folks need is to be taught the doctrine of Christ and see if they are ready to repent!

Penitent believers have always responded by saying, “What hinders me from being baptized?” (Acts 8:36)

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 7, 2016 in Doctrine

 

The Minister as the Tool Man


 

You see them driving around most urban areas and even venturing out in small town USA. Their destinations are automotive garages and any other place of business that uses tools. Most of the vehicles are large vans or panel trucks and carry such logos as “Snap-On Tools,” or “Matco.”

What if it were the job of these drivers to rush from place to place tightening, untightening and doing all the actual mechanical repairing of the vehicles? Imagine the mechanics in these shops calling on the tool man every time they needed a bolt tightened or a screw adjusted, sitting around waiting for them to arrive and do the work. It is a comical scene based on the ridiculous; hundreds of mechanics waiting for the help of few exhausted and distraught tool men.

The truth of the matter is, these tool men in their vans only provide the tools. It is the mechanics who do the work.

Sometimes we in the local church can actually get caught up in a similar comedy of errors. A church can look to their minister as the one whom they hire to do their ministry for them. A minister can also be at fault for allowing himself to be like the misguided tool man trying to do it all himself.

The truth of the matter is, in God’s economy of work in the local church it is the individual people in the congregation who are called by God to do the bulk of the ministry. The minister’s job is to equip them for their ministry.

The preacher is a teacher, though he has to solicit his own class. He heals without pills or knife. He is a lawyer, a social worker, an editor, a philosopher, a salesman, a handy decorative piece for public functions, an entertainer, a chairman of the building fund and a first-class janitor.

People come to him and he goes to the people. He rejoices when they rejoice and weeps when they weep. He visits the sick, marries the young, buries the dead, prepares and delivers speeches to every organization under the sun, and tries to stay sweet when he is abused for not calling on certain people. He helps plan the program of the church and meets with every group he can, which may mean that some nights he must attend two and three meetings.

When he lies down at night, he is burdened and prays for certain “sheep,” their weaknesses, their problems, and their absence from the service. And, oh yes, in his spare time, he prepares and delivers several sermons, Bible lessons, radio programs, class messages, etc. And when Monday comes and some chap roars, “What an easy job you preachers have!” he tries to smile and keep sweet.

Have you ever heard the above question asked? Or the remark made thoughtlessly, “What an easy task the minister has! He speaks about 25 minutes twice on Sunday and once on Wednesday with the rest of the week all his own!”

However, with all these aggravations, many would rather be divinely called ministers of the gospel than be anything else.

 

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 1, 2016 in Encouragement

 

Why I left the Roman Catholic church by John A. Cupp


 mp3icon YouTube JesusIsLordofthisWebSite placeforyou2 575273_579331012148169_1163921425_n

 ——————————————–

(John A. Cupp is a longtime family friend of Gary Davenport and this material is presented for your edification)
 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS

At this time I would like to thank each and every one of you assembled here this evening for coming out. I know there are a lot of places you could be that might be a lot more entertaining than here, but I am thankful to God that there are some who would come out tonight to listen to this lesson as we study from the word of God.

As we begin our lesson, I want to take the title itself and examine some of the implications that are contained therein. First, why I left the Roman Catholic Church or just the Catholic Church will be sufficient. The title implies that I did leave it, but before you leave anything you must be a member of that body, group or organization that you are about to leave. I have papers in my pocket tonight that can prove to anybody that I was baptized (and I use that term loosely at this point) I was baptized into the Catholic Church at the age of our days. Second, I want to tell you that I did leave the Catholic Church. In the first place, if I didn’t leave it, I wouldn’t be her tonight, and in the second place, I want you to know assuredly that I did leave it and I was not put out. Sometimes people think, as soon as you’re going to speak or preach about leaving the Catholic Church, that you are a reprobate and they kicked you out.

I can prove to you that nobody kicked me out, but I left of my own accord, and I thank God everyday of my life that I did leave.

Before we get into the main discussion of the lesson, I want to say with the exception of approximately fifteen people in this audience, the rest of you are total strangers to me. Of that number I do not know how many of you are Roman Catholics, with the exception of maybe one. Friends, I want to assure you of one thing tonight, whether you are a Christian, whether you are a member of some denomination, whether you are a Roman Catholic or not, I am going to treat you just like I would want you to treat me, because it hasn’t been too many years since I sat in the same seat—not in this city or state—but I sat in a meeting house similar to this and heard the Gospel for the first time. I guarantee you one thing right now, had the preacher said something about the Catholic Church which was untrue, I would have walked out and wouldn’t have listened to his sermon. Everything I’m going to say tonight, I’m going to read to you verbatim from these books I have on this stand that deal with the teaching, or the doctrine of the Catholic Church. I want you to do me a favor, If you are here tonight and are a Catholic and I misrepresent you, I want you to tell me about it, because I find that people sometimes unconsciously misrepresent denominations and the Catholic Church.

These books to which I will refer in my lesson, and from which I will quote, are official books of the Catholic Church. I have one book here “The History of the Church” by a man named Birkhasuser. This particular volume is designed for use as a textbook in Catholic seminaries. I have another book here called “Religion, Doctrine and Practice”. This man calls himself “Father” or “Reverend” Cassilly, and is one of the best writers of the Catholic Church, and a member of the Jesuit Society. I am going to refer to Mr. Cassilly in that manner. Another book here is called “Advanced Catechism of Catholic Faith and Practice” and another one “A Baltimore Catechism Number Three”. These three last books mentioned aren’t used in seminaries, but rather, they’re the textbooks that are used in the parochial schools, grammar and high schools.

I want you, if you have a Bible, to turn to Galatians the first chapter. I’m using the King James Version and reading to you verses six through ten. I want you to carefully listen and see if this applies to this meeting tonight. Paul, an inspired writer of God, says in Galatians the first chapter, verse six, writing to the Church at Galatia, “I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another Gospel.” Now Paul is about to rebuke them for something that is being done. He goes on in verse seven and explains what this is. Notice this, “Which is not another, but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the Gospel of Christ, but though we, or an angel from Heaven,” (Now notice this wording) “Though we”, an inspired man of God – as Paul was, “or an angel from Heaven”, as he goes on to say, “preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that y have received, let him be accursed. For do I persuade men, or God? Or do I seek to please men? For if I yet pleased men, I shall not be the servant of Christ.” That is Galatians the first chapter, read out of the King James Version. A version that is studied perhaps more than any other version by people of the world who are non-Catholics. As I study this writing of the Apostle Paul, he warned over nineteen hundred years ago to look out for something. He said that there are some among you who would pervert the Gospel, and that’s a warning, and then he goes on and warns us to be careful and to look out for them. He also tells us, if anybody, ANYBODY even and angel from heaven, preach any other doctrine that he is to be accursed!

I have in my hand another Catholic book. This is a Revision of the Challoner-Rheims Version of the New Testament. You read your King James, and the Catholic that reads his New Testament will read this. I want you to listen carefully as I read to you the official Catholic interpretation of this scripture. To be perfectly honest with you, I like this translation better than the King James, as it does no injutice to the Greek in this test. When I read it, you will see what I am talking about. Here’s the Catholic interpretation: Paul speaking: “I marvel that ye are so quickly deserting him who called you to the grace of Christ, changing to another gospel; which is not another gospel, except in this respect, that there are some who trouble you, and wish to pervert the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from Heaven should preach a gospel to you other than that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema!” Then he goes on to say, “As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone preach a gospel to you other than that which ye have received, let him be anathema. For am I now seeking the favor of men, or of God? Or am I seeking to please men? If I am still trying to please men, I should not be a servant of Christ.”

That is the Catholic translation of that verse of scripture, and I want you to notice what the Apostle Paul is warning every Catholic who reads that verse today. “If we, or an angel from Heaven should preach a gospel to you, other than that which we have preached to you, let him be Anathema.” Now somebody says, “What does Anathema mean?” Let’s have the Catholics explain it, because they’ve got a footnote on it. “Anathema: i.e. cursed, excluded from the Kingdom of God.” Paul wrote this and it will be the basis of my lesson.

Paul warned us, and I warn you tonight, that God gave us a gospel, God gave us a doctrine. He gave it to us over nineteen hundred years ago, and here one of his inspired writers warns us, pleads with us—that if anybody else, even an angel from Heaven (now how much higher could you get) if they preached any other gospel unto you than the New Testament gospel they are to be anathema, accursed, or cut out. Friends, I studied that verse of scripture a number of years ago, and as I studied it, I had to make a decision. The Apostle Paul either meant what he said, or he didn’t mean what he said, and I think as we continue in this lesson tonight we will see from the word of God, that everything an inspired man has ever put in the Bible, God put there because he wanted his people to follow it, because he wanted them to believe it, and because it was needful for the good of man.

PERSONAL HISTORY

It might be interesting at this point to give you some background in my life. As I said before, I became a member of the Catholic Church at a very young age. As a matter of fact, I became a member of the Catholic Church on April the 12th after I was born on April 8th. Somebody doesn’t see a thing wrong with that, and says, “Well, what are you making a statement about that for? After all, that happens to all Catholics. Because the Catholic Church teaches that a child should be baptized as soon as possible. To put off the sacrament for 3 or 4 weeks, and even longer, without very grave reasons, may be a grievous sin.: * (*Klauder, Rev., Catholic Practice, p. 25.)

This is their official teaching. My mother knew this teaching and she wasn’t taking any chances. They even say a week or two after birth, and she beat them to that. She got me there after four days, and had me “baptized” into the Catholic Church. Previously, I said I used the word baptism loosely. I wasn’t baptized into anything! I was: poured” into the Catholic Church. That’s all they did to me. They poured a little water over my head, called me John Andrew, and I officially became a member of the Roman Catholic Church, and my name is recorded on the books at Saint Columbus Church, in Youngstown, Ohio. Somebody might say, “Well, why didn’t you consider that baptism:” Friends, if you study the New Testament you would know that’s not baptism. You know there are certain things that I have to do before baptism. I want to ask you, what child of four days old ever had anything to repent of except keeping his parents up half the night: I had to repent of something* (* Acts 2:38) the Bible just says so. They baptized me, or poured me, and I had done nothing for which I should repent. That sounds funny, but it’s very serious, because from the very beginning they were not following the teaching of the scriptures.

You are probably wondering just what my early life in the Catholic Church was. Well, I went to Catholic schools all my school-life—with a couple years exception. Nearly every day of my life in the Catholic school we went to Mass (usually at eight in the morning), and were special devotions, we would go to Communion. I didn’t live next door to the Catholic Church; in Youngstown I lived about three miles from the Church! Hence, when I went to Mass, I didn’t just cross the street, but traveled the distance on foot! (And in the Catholic Church one doesn’t eat before Communion.) Let it be remembered that in Ohio the snow gets pretty deep, and for boys and girls in the first and second grades it can make travelling pretty difficult!! Nevertheless, we would go to church and Communion, then we ate a sandwich for breakfast and a couple of sandwiches for dinner, and we didn’t think a thing in the world of it. As a matter of fact, we were glad to do it.

That brings me to a point that I want to bring to you. I believe that the New Testament has the truth, and if we follow the New Testament we have the truth. The Catholic Church is not following the New Testament, but you know they go to church and do a lot of good works that put us to shame. I’ve heard people say, “Now why should I take my children to Bible study on Sunday morning? You mean I’ve got to get up an hour earlier, and dress all of them and get them there?” If you were in the Catholic church, you would have them to church every morning during some months, and would be happy to do it. Yet we will stand up and shout to heaven “we’ve go the truth” and we’re too lazy to do anything about it. If you want to talk about people that have zeal and will put us to shame in many cases, it’s the Catholic. Just because they have zeal and can put us to shame, still if they don’t follow God,* (Matthew 7:21-25) Matthew the seventh chapter has an answer to that particular situation.

When I was in the Catholic (or parochial) schools I became an altar boy. I believe this is the desire and wish of every young Catholic boy, and every mother and father want their son to become an altar boy. Why is that so important to a Catholic? Let me tell you. The Catholic church teaches that, especially during the transubstantiation of the mass, that the host and the wine that the priest holds up actually becomes the body and blood of Jesus Christ. Here’s the priest as he offers it and holds it up on the altar during the transubstantiation. It is the privilege of the altar boy to hold the vestment of the priest as he kneels and stands. They will tell you, and will impress it upon your mind—just think!—you are holding the garments of the one who is holding Christ in his hands. Friends, I’ll tell you, with arguments like that, you want to learn your Latin and become and altar boy. You want to get to serve mass because if you love God, you want to be by him. I loved God, and I wanted to be by him.

It was during this time as an altar boy, that I had the privilege (and then I considered it a deep privilege) to serve such men as Cardinal Mooney. Cardinal Mooney was from my hometown of Youngstown. He advanced to one of the highest offices in the Catholic Church,–and I had the privilege of service Mass for him. Another cardinal that I had the privilege of serving mass for was a man by the name of Mindszenty. He came over from Hungary one year and went about the United States making speeches to different Catholic religious organizations. It was when he was in Youngstown for a Labor Day speech, I served in the ceremony with Cardinal Mindszenty. Somebody says, “What does this have to do with the story?” Simply this: I had to opportunity then of coming in very close contact with the priests, bishops and even cardinals. As a matter of fact, I have a letter (now I’m not saying this to brag, I’m just giving you some background). I have a letter in my files that will prove to you that I was one of the main altar boys who served Bishop McFadden when Youngstown was made a diocese of the Catholic church. I had then the opportunity to come in contact with the priests and the bishops when they were serving God, according to the teachings of their church. It made me happy, and I couldn’t help thinking how wonderful it would be if I, John Cupp, could become a priest and help to serve all these people.

LIFE IN THE SEMINARY

It was while I was thinking along this line that I met a priest a Father Carroll, as he called himself, who was a member of the Maryknoll Missions. Maryknoll Missions are a group of Catholic priests, nuns and brothers, who go into foreign lands, and preach the gospel to the poor heathens. Well, I listened to his story, and I talked with him. After talking to him and another priest by the name of Harrington, I decided to go to the Seminary and study to be a Catholic priest. After preliminary investigations, physical examinations and such, I was sent to Buffalo, New York, to Saint Joseph’s Seminary. There I began the study of the Catholic Church that was offered to the young men who were going to spend their next eight years in the Seminary studying to be Catholic priests.

It was then I began to ask questions. Previous to this I had been too contented to ask any questions. I wasn’t worried about anything. After all, if we (The Catholic Church) were doing it, it must be right and what else was there to do. Every Thursday afternoon we had what they called orientation periods. It was at that time the Monsignor in charge of the Seminary would take us up to the third floor of the school in the auditorium and there he would lecture to us about some of the things that we could expect after we were finally ordained priests. The first meeting we had, he made a statement that stuck with me. He said to us at that meeting—(there were about sixty-two of us in the class)—”at the end of this course, if we get two priests out of the sixty-two, we’re running a good average”. Do you know what I said, when he said that? I said to myself, “Father, if there are two priests that come out of this group, Cupp’s going to be one of them”. Somebody says at this time, “Well if you went to the Seminary and left, you weren’t sincere in the first place”. I want to go again to this Catholic Testament, and read to you the statement that won me admission to the Seminary in Buffalo, New York. I want you to listen to it and see the way I was thinking then. This is what I wrote to gain admission. “I want to become a Maryknoll Missionary because I have heard and read of their works. I feel on the advice of my priest, that this is the way I can spend my life, in knowing, loving and serving God. Only in this way, do I help others to save their souls. I know it is a life of many hardships, but I hope to depend on the grace of God to give me the ability to carry on.” I wrote that a long time ago. I didn’t come across it until about two years ago. So then when somebody says, “You weren’t sincere in the first place”, I beg to differ with you. That’s why I read that statement.

The priest began to lecture and tell us about some of the things we could expect after we were ordained. He told us about a young man who had been ordained in May. He said this particular man was sent to a parish. As he went to work with this parish, it was his duty on Sunday afternoon to go out and baptize the infants. Every Sunday afternoon at home they baptized the infants. He went out and came back in a little while and was crying. The old Monseignor was kneeling in the sacristy saying his office, that is the prayers that they have to say every day. He looked at the young man and said, “What’s the matter?” The young man answered, “Father, that baby I baptized—its father was a priest.” He used to say to us, “Many times this collar will choke you.” He had the white collar on that you have all seen. I didn’t know then what he was talking about—I didn’t understand him. When he began to warn us about some of these things I began to understand.

I want to say something at this point, I said that he said (and he did) that the father of that baby was a Catholic priest. Just about now somebody is thinking, “You know, that bears out a story I heard from so and so from such and such a place about Catholic so and so and such and such. Friends, I want to say this to you. You have heard a lot of stories about the Catholic Church. I’ve heard some that would curl your hair. But I want to let you in on a secret. The Catholics have heard stories about you that would curl your hair too. Catholics talk about Protestants and Protestants turn around and talk about Catholics and when you shuck it all down and examine what they are both saying, there is usually about one-tenth of one percent of truth to what either side is saying. This reminds me of a game we played at parties when I was a child. We sat in a circle, somebody would start a story, and would pass it around the room from person to person. You know what had happened when it got back to the person who had started it? Nine cases out of ten, it was so jumbled up he didn’t recognize it as the story he started with. That is what happens when we start to talk about the Catholics and the Catholics begin to talk about us. Friends listen, there are some cases and I know of one case personally in my own family, (when I say my own family I know what I’m speaking of) where priests and nuns have gotten out of line, but I want you to know this; that is not the common practice. There are some people in the Roman Catholic Church tonight as sincere as any Christian has ever been. But still, because they are sincere and reject the work of God, we can’t make excuses for them.

I began to ask a lot of questions after some of these lectures. One thing that bothered me in particular was confession. I wanted to know why I had to go to confession. (When we were in the seminary we had to go once a week and I began to ask questions about this practice.) About the best answer I ever got from the Monsignor was this, “Now, when you boys have been here long enough, these things will all come—they will all be revealed to you and you’ll understand. Well, I listened to that for so long that I simply got disgusted. I even stopped studying my Latin. I didn’t car what happened, and decided to go home.

RETURN HOME

What were the reactions of my parents when I returned home? Well, when I first got back to Youngstown, I started to think about what that priest said in the first lecture he gave us. Out of this class if we get two—or actually out of fifty he said, if we get two that’s a good average. I started to think to myself. Before I left the Seminary I could think of about seventeen boys that had left before me. I started to ask myself the question, “John, what happens to these boys?” Let me tell you what happens. Some of them come out and continue to live in the Catholic Church. Others come out and they join some denomination; soon, if they study, they find themselves as bad off as they were before. Still others, get to the condition I believe I was in—about to become an atheist.

You wonder why that was. When I came home, unknown to others, I began to go to other churches. I went to the Methodist Church in Youngstown, Ohio (I want you to know where these are). I went to the Baptist Church, The Presbyterian Church and the Episcopalian Church—and the Catholic Church. You know it was the funniest thing, everyone of them begged me to come, they were all going to save me. They were all going to get me to heaven, but they were all going to do it a different way! Now I couldn’t understand that. Why there was a just God in Heaven who would let a man in this pulpit and that pulpit and another and another were telling me that everybody else was going to hell, now there must have been something wrong. I wondered just what was missing. What was lacking that would lead a person into a mess like that.

Friends, if you have ever been in that position you know what I’m talking about. Well, I wasn’t too happy with anything about that time, but I would go to mass on Sunday morning for one reason—t keep my mother from reprimanding me for not going. It was during this period when I was so undecided and couldn’t make up my mind, when I had been studying these other religions and they were all so farfetched that it was impossible to believe anything, that I met a young lady who was a member of the Lord’s church. Soon after we met she asked me to go to church with her, but I refused. I was sick and tired of religion. I wondered what her denomination had to offer that everybody else didn’t have, and continued to refuse to go until she hit my weak spot. One Sunday afternoon she invited me home for lunch and I went with her, as I’ve never passed up a free meal yet. We were sitting there eating and the doorbell rang. She answered the door and ushered in a young man and lady who I imagined were friends she knew from a club or something. The man was about twenty-one and his wife was about the same age. They sat down and after dinner we got to talking shop. He said Mr. Cupp, what do you do? “Mr. Barnhouse, what do you do “well,” he said, “I’m preaching where Shirley goes to church.” I was astonished, here was a young man about twenty-one years old preaching to old people! Well, I went to church that night, and I’ll tell you why. I was just plain curious. After the sermon, the young lady asked me what I thought of it. I told her it was very interesting, but one thing struck me in particular, the way everything he said he took from the Bible. He didn’t use anything else. I couldn’t understand why he placed so much faith in one book, but as I began to study this book, I could see that this is what God had given us in the first place to make us united. As long as a person follows that teaching, he would be saved, if he would but do what Jesus Christ said, and leave man and his personal opinions out. I began to go to church regularly. I went for about four Sunday nights and about two Sundays, morning and evening. The next Sunday I walked up the aisle, March 5, 1950, and was baptized by Brother Jess Nutter, because at last I had found something that wasn’t arguing with itself, that would tell me the way to get to heaven. I knew if God was right, if this was his book, then what he said, I’d better do. For as sure as I could tell, I was headed straight for Hell.

You know, we Christians sometimes forget how lucky we are. Let’s just take this illustration, for example: When an average preacher, not a member of the Church of Christ, a denominational preacher or a Catholic goes to discuss religion with you, he has to take every book that every one of his intelligent men have written on the subject. Nine times out of ten he will debate with you, and he will find one man saying in 1890 what another man contradicted in 1945, so he just doesn’t know which way to turn. When you start talking about God, all you need to have is the word of God. God gave you in the Bible everything you have to know.

He gave you the plan of salvation. He tells you how to live and what to do after you have obeyed the gospel. Friends, that is what I had been looking for for a long time. God wasn’t cruel—He hadn’t forgotten man. He has given them something that they could take, and follow, and study, and eventually go home and be with Him in Heaven.

About this time, in February of that year my mother happened to find a church bulletin in my pocket. She was watching me very closely and found that I was going to another church. Then I had to make up my mind. Should I wait to be baptized as God said I had to be? Should I wait until I was financially able to get away from home? Or should I go ahead and do it right now? There’s another decision you should try to make sometime. I decided to be baptized right away. So that March 5th I was baptized. From the day in February they found that paper in my pocket—February, March, April, May and June—five months I lived with my mother and father, two brothers and a sister, and they spoke not one word to me. The best I could get out of them was, “Get Up”, in the morning when it was time to get up, and that is about all. Oh, they would fight with me—one brother in particular. He wanted to argue anytime he could and he usually ended up arguing with his fists. He claimed to be a good Christian, and I enjoyed watching him act like that.

Well, if you lived home for five months, with people that you loved, (and I love my mother tonight as much as I love anybody) if you lived home under conditions like that, I ask you, what would you do? I’ll tell you what you would do in the average case. You would think about it so much that you would probably end up going back to the Catholic Church, just to be friends with everybody. If it were not for the help of the church people, I don’t know what I would have done. I think I might be back in the Catholic Church tonight. I wouldn’t have worried about God and doctrine or things like that, because I could go back there where my loved ones were. It was the help of the church people that kept me going. It was their encouragement and their patience and their time when I would sit down and ask questions, (and I was full of questions). They would say, “John, if you will open your Bible and study it, I think you will see what you want.” You know, I began to realize that the Bible was the most wonderful thing in the world. That it was just full of good material. There isn’t a day goes by at the present time that I don’t become more and more engrossed in God’s word. It is so full of the things that we need, and God gave it to us so long ago.

When my parents finally did find out that I had obeyed the gospel, they put me out—disowned and disinherited me. When I tried to talk religion with them, the back door was opened, and even today I can’t talk religion with them. Last April I had to go home because of sickness, not in my own family, but the family of a group of church people that had taken me in, and literally speaking adopted me. When in Youngstown I went to my mother’s house. She met my wife for the first time, but there was one thing that I couldn’t do. I couldn’t open the Bible and show her that precious word that God had given us. **Romans 1:16 That word that Paul said was the power of God unto Salvation.

I hope I haven’t bored you with background. At this time we are going to go in and see just what the reasons were which caused me to leave the Catholic church. What were some of those question I had to answer for myself? At this time, I could go into the history of the Catholic Church, but I didn’t leave on account of the history. I left because of some of the things that the average Catholic is associated with—the things that they know, the things that they love, and the things they do.

CONFESSION

I told you about confession earlier in the lesson. That was the first thing that bothered me. I couldn’t get the teaching on confession straight in my mind. Why should I go once a week, especially in the seminary where you weren’t allowed to read the newspaper, or go to the show without an older brother, you had to study most of the time, and you just couldn’t get into any mischief, and yet you had to go to confession once a week. I didn’t have anything to tell, but we had to go. I kept asking questions about that. I wanted them to tell me somehow, why we had to do it. As far as I knew, confession had been here since the church had been established. But I began to have my eyes opened, I guess you would call it. I actually surprised myself by studying about how long confession had been around. Confession in the Catholic Church today is what they call auricular confession. That simply means confession from your mouth to the ear of the priest. I thought that had been here since the time of the apostles, but if you will check with Catholic history auricular confession didn’t come into existence until the year 1215, when it was defined by Pope Innocent III, at the IV Council of Lateran.

When did the Church come into existence? You might put on a piece of paper large number to represent 33 A.D. or the Day of Pentecost, when Jesus Christ’s church was established. Here is a doctrine that is coming in, in the year 1215 A.D. brought in by the man called Pope Innocent who defined it. It had been around for a few years before, but now they get up the courage to define it. I had to go and kneel before a priest confess my sins and tell him I was sorry when in some cases he was doing things a lot worse. When I began to study the Bible I wanted to know just why I had to go and kneel down and tell the priest my sins. Now somebody says “How do we know that it is the duty of the priest to forgive your sins?” To answer the skeptic I will refer you to this book by Mr. Cassilly, Religion, Doctrine, and Practice. On page 266, question number 7, we find this question: “Mention the principal powers of the priest. The principal powers of the priest are to offer the Holy Sacrifice, (meaning the mass) and to forgive sins”. Now there is only one thing wrong with that. I checked it out in my New Testament, in the Challoner Rheims Version and in the King James translation. I couldn’t find that teaching in there any place. Somebody referred me to First Timothy, chapter two and verse five. You know what I found? Jesus Christ is my mediator, (He’s the one that I go to God through when I’ve sinned) I ask God to forgive me. You can take any translation you have, Latin Vulgate, King James, American Standard, or any other translation and there is not one of them that will tell you to go to the Catholic priest to confess your faults. James the fifth chapter says, “Confess your faults one to another”. There is not a Catholic priest mentioned in any—one of those translations. Now you can see why I wondered about confession. Friends it is hard to make the decision I had to make, to hold on to something that you have loved all your life, or to turn around and take something that seems new, but has actually been here longer than the Doctrine of Confession. Now I ask this question, “Why should I go to the Catholic priests when Jesus Christ is my mediator between God and man?” That is the wedge that started to open the gap.

INSTRUMENTAL MUSIC

Another thing that bothered me was instrumental music. That may sound strange to you. The first night I walked into the Church of Christ we were ready for church and everybody sat down. A man stood up with a song book, and just started singing. They didn’t have an organ or a piano. I couldn’t figure it out. When we started home that night, I asked the young lady, “Can’t you afford a piano?”, as it was a small congregation. Well, she put me straight in no uncertain terms. She said that if God had commanded us to have an organ or a piano, we would have the best that money could buy.

Well, why don’t you have and instrument of music? When I was in the early grades of Catholic school, we used to sing during mass. We had choirs and sang on Sunday mornings at nine o’clock mass. By the time I got up into the high school age, that had almost completely passed away in Youngstown. I don’t know if you do it here, but they had practically stopped the singing by school children and adults at mass. The only choirs they had were the seminarian choirs, men in the seminary who would sing, or the choirs from the high schools, and occasionally a choir from the grade school. I began to study instrumental music. I wondered did they (the Catholic Church) have that from the time of Christ. Here I got another shock. I found that instrumental music did not come until the year of 666 A.D. and it was brought in by a pope at that time by the name of Vitalian.* Y You ask what the reaction was? I’ll tell you.** (*Oechtering, Rev. Mgr. J.H., Short Catechism of Church History, p. 105) (** Catholic Encyclopedia, v61. II, pp. 300-301) The people were so angry and so mad that they had to take the organ out of the church, in some instances, for over two hundred years. I can show this to you from Catholic books, it isn’t something I’m making up. Today Pope Vitalian is a saint. He brought it in not worrying about what is said in Revelation 22:18-19.

When a person argues that Scripture is their basis for the instrument—the only scripture or book they have is Catholic Church tradition. I went to my Bible. I had somebody point out some very interesting verses of scripture. They showed me Ephesians 5:19 AND Colossians 3:16. I studied these verses in different translations and all I could read was that I was to sing and make melody in my heart. There wasn’t an example or verse that told me to use a banjo, an accordion, a piano or anything else. It just told me to sing, and make melody in my heart unto God. There’s another thing. What are you going to do? You have to follow one or the other—you have to follow the teaching of Jesus Christ—you have to follow this instrumental music teaching that has been here quite a while too, but not as long as the Bible. I was preaching this sermon one time and made that same statement. An old lady called me down, she said, “Wait a minute young man. You’ve missed the boat.” When I asked her what she meant she asked me if I had ever been to any of the other churches—that they all had their organ or their piano, and because they all used it, it must be all right. Friend, I say this to you kindly, if you are a member of some organization that uses an instrument of music in worship, you can’t find authority for it in the New Testament. You know where you will find it? You will find it in 666 when Mr. Vitalian brought it into the Catholic Church. That is your only authority.

The denominational world is really following the Catholics. Sixty years ago how many non-Catholic churches would have thought of celebrating Lent? I don’t imagine there were any. But you know, it was a most amazing thing. During what they call the Lenten season I made a trip to the Central part of the state, and in every town through which I would drive they would have a big sign LENTEN SERVICE. Where did they find that in the Bible? They found it in the same Bible they found instrumental music—Catholic tradition. They couldn’t prove it from the word of God. When they observe Lent they take it from the Catholics. They didn’t have that fifty or sixty years ago, but they’ve got it today. When you discuss this with a Protestant and ask him for scriptural authority, he doesn’t have to waste time looking in the Bible. All he has to do is go back and show you where the Catholic Church brought it in. It is a sad case, but it is just a case of trying to keep up with the Joneses. You know that old saying, “You just stay where you are, and you’ll meet them coming back.”

The teaching on Purgatory

The next thing that I will discuss, because it caused me a lot of concern, is the teaching of the Catholic Church on purgatory. As far as I was concerned, purgatory was like everything else. It had been there from the year the church was established, and we could just go to the Bible and show you all about it if you wanted to know when we had to use it. Catholics today will tell you that their source of authority is twofold. It is from scripture and from tradition. They won’t argue with you about it. As a matter of fact, we are going to use a few questions in a minute from their books that they use to show that they get their authority from tradition.

Where is purgatory, how do you get there, and how do you get out? I found the doctrine of purgatory wasn’t defined until the year 1438 and then it was defined by the Council of Florence.* It was there they began to set up some of the teachings about indulgences and such like. When I was in the seminary there was a boy there by the name of Jimmy Pastoure from Canton, Ohio. Jimmy, his mother and brother were Catholics. I found out one day helping him wash dishes that his Dad was not a Catholic. That shocked me. When I asked him why his Dad was not a Catholic he told me that his Father just did not believe in purgatory, and I worked as hard as I’ve ever worked on any project to get books and pamphlets that would convince him. I hope I didn’t convince him, because when I started to study it for myself, I could not find it in the word of God. We might turn again to Mr. Cassilly’s book and let him answer just what purgatory is. (* Birkhaeuser, Rev. J.A., History of the Church, p. 421)

I can’t define it from the Bible so don’t ask me. Question number 17 on page 459, “What is purgatory?” “Purgatory is a state in which the souls of the just after death are purified from the stains of sin still remaining before they can enter heaven.” Now that’s their book. That is what they teach. Mr. Cassilly goes on to say “The doctrine of purgatory is entirely according to reason.” You know this amazes me, you go to them and they will dig up a lot of scriptures and try to apply it to the teaching, but when he says it is entirely according to reason he simply doesn’t need scripture. He goes on to say, “The Council of Trent says the scripture (now if the scriptures say it, I want to accept it, because I know if I reject scripture I’m going to be lost) and the early tradition of the Church teaches that purgatory exists.” I would like to know what verse of scripture that is. I’ve talked with a lot of Catholics and I’ve searched for it but I haven’t been able to find it, so if you know where it is, I want you to tell me. Somebody says, “Well where is purgatory?” A Catholic can’t tell you. Some of their greatest scholars have been arguing about that. Some will tell you that it’s the sun, other say that it is the center of the earth, while others say it’s out in the galaxys someplace. They just can’t tell you. Hebrews 9:27 tells me something very interesting. “And as it is appointed unto man once to die, but after this is the judgment.” I say this to you tonight, there is not a verse of scripture in the New Testament that teaches me that if I die with sin on my soul that you can do anything to help me, or that I can come back and have a second chance. It just isn’t in the Bible.

Just who goes to purgatory? Catholics teach there are two kinds of sin: mortal sin and venial sin. Big sin and little sin. The Bible doesn’t say this but they do. If a man dies with mortal sin on his soul, he goes to Christ, is judged and goes to hell. If the man dies with venial sin on his soul, he is judged, but goes to purgatory to serve out his time. The Bible doesn’t say that, but the Catholic Church does* (* Ibid., page 421)

If the Bible teaches it I want you to show it to me. Somebody asks, “What is there to move people to make them believe anything like that?” I think question nineteen in Mr. Cassilly’s book answers that. “What are the pains of purgatory?” “The principal pain of purgatory is deprivation of the Beatific Vision;” (break that down into language the average person understands, and it means you can’t see Christ) “and the general tradition of the church is that the souls also suffer acutely in other ways. Many say that the souls are punished by fire.” Now just think, a loved one dies and the Catholic priest said he probably went to purgatory. This is how they get this doctrine across. What about after the day of judgment? “After judgement day there will be heaven and hell, but no purgatory”, Question twenty, part B.

Let’s take a man who dies and follow their teaching on purgatory. He dies and goes to God. If he has a mortal sin on his soul, Christ says “Now you can’t come into Heaven!” and the man goes to Hell. If a man dies with Venial sin on his soul, he is judged by Christ and sentenced to purgatory for a certain period of time. Again they tell you that you get so many days indulgences for certain acts, but they can’t tell you to save their life how many days indulgences an individual would need in purgatory. You ask, “When a person goes to purgatory, how can he get out.” He can get out in one of two ways. The first way he can get out is to serve his time, or the second way is that he can get out by your helping him get out. From this book Advanced Catechism, I read question 415. “Can the faithful on earth help the soul in purgatory?” “The faithful on earth can help the souls in purgatory by their prayers, fasts, alms deeds, indulgences and by having masses said for them”. These thoughts bring in another teaching of the Catholic Church. The Communion of Saints. If I were a Catholic, and somebody I loved died, I would simply go to the priest and say that I want a mass said for the one who died and the indulgences would be applied to their indulgences when that act was performed that would be applied to their account, just like paying a loan, when they take so much off, the total debt, after that person paid the time, then he would be allowed to go to heaven and be with God. That’s the way the Communion of Saints works.

Indulgences are not—and I want to say this and make it clear—never were, and never will be a license to sin. You might properly call indulgences, “The Key to Heaven.” There is not a Catholic theologian today who would agree with you if you were to say indulgences are a license to sin. If we misrepresent the Catholics on one thing, it is on indulgences. You have heard the story that they are having a special down at the Catholic Church this week-—indulgences three for a dollar. You go buy some and then sin all you want. This is just a lot of foolish gossip and anybody who repeats it should be ashamed of himself. Talk like this is what gets false stories started. Trouble begins when people start passing stories like that which have no foundation. There is not a Catholic priest alive today who would not admit to you that there have been misuses of indulgences, but friends please don’t show somebody how little you know, and I say that kindly, don’t show them how ignorant you are by taking a misuse that they will admit and say this is what you do and teach all the time. It isn’t what they teach all the time, they teach just what I’ve told you. Some people have heard so many other things about them, that they just don’t know what the truth is.

Let me give you an example of one of the misuses of indulgences. The Low Mass in the United States today costs one dollar. It doesn’t cost—a good Catholic asks what is the offering. In times past you could go to Canada and have the Low Mass for the same amount of indulgences said for twenty-five cents, but if you lived in France where there were a lot poor priest, you could have the mass with the same amount of indulgences said for five cents. Now here is what is on record of happening.* When the dollar was paid (*Chiniquy, Charles, Fifty Years in the Church of Rome p.201) in the United States, twenty-five cents was sent to Cannonade to have the Mass said, the Priest in Canada sent Five cents to France and kept twenty cents and finally the Mass was said for the poor soul who died. Somebody was making ninety-five cents on a dollar. They’ll admit that that is wrong, but it is not the general practice, let me say that, that has been done in times past, but because they’ve done that in times past, don’t dig up the dirt, just take the doctrine of purgatory and indulgences which they are proud of and examine it along side the word of God.

BAPTISM

When I began to study about baptism, I thought that pouring was perfectly all right. I had been a sponsor in a number of Catholic baptisms, and it was then I would stand up and be a Godparent for the infant that was to be baptized. I said in the beginning I was “poured” into the Catholic Church. Now that’s just about true. I began to study the word of God, especially after I saw an individual baptized, and I couldn’t understand how they baptized her. It just didn’t make sense to me for they took the girl and put her completely down in the water, just like in this pool here, got her all wet, then they brought her up. I couldn’t understand why they would do anything like that. I thought baptism had always been pouring from the beginning. Upon closer investigation I found that pouring and sprinkling were not introduced into the Catholic Church until approximately 1311 A.D. Now remember that the Church began 33 A.D. You compare 1311 with it and you’ll find that this was introduced into the church a long time after Jesus Christ told us how to be baptized. I want to again read to you a question or statement from Mr. Cassilly’s book and see what they have to say about baptism. “What is baptism? Baptism is the sacrament of regeneration, which cleanses us from original sin, makes us Christians, Children of God, and heirs of Heaven”* This is how they get (*Cassilly, S.J., Religion, Doctrine & Practice p. 183) baptism across to the average Catholic. They say, “Mother, when your child is born it has original sin on its soul, all the way from Adam, and if it were to die with it, it wouldn’t go home to be with God in Heaven, but would go to Limbo.”** The Bible

(**Rumble & Carty, Fathers, Radio Replies, Vol. I, p. 167) doesn’t sat that.*** (***Matthew 18) I wish all our souls tonight were as pure as any child that is in this audience. “In what three ways may the water be applied in baptism.”* “The water may (*Cassilly, S.J., Religion, Doctrine & Practice, p. 136) be applied by immersion, sprinkling or pouring. A. The Church has at different times and places applied the water in these three ways. Sprinkling is no longer practiced, although it might be used in a possible case where neither or the other methods could be followed. Immersion means dipping a person wholly or partly under water.” They don’t even define the term correctly. “This method is still sanctioned by cannon law for churches which have an approved ritual book that calls for it.” Some wonder what cannon law is. It is to the Catholic what the Bible is to Christians. That is the official word, and the official word even recognizes immersion today. The ordinary way is to pour water on the head. I had to study about that because I found another very interesting thing.

The Catholic Church that I was a member of at that time was baptizing infants at a very rapid rate, during the Second World War as most of you remember. They were actually pouring water on their heads, and when I went to the Bible all I could find it saying was that baptism was a burial, so somebody’s wrong. Either the apostles were wrong when they defined it, or the Catholic Church was wrong when they ignored it! There’s that old question that will keep popping up in your mind when you study the Bible and compare your doctrine with the Word of God. God said this and my preacher said that, now which are you going to follow. Don’t follow your preacher, follow God. That’s the only safe thing to do. The Bible says that we are to buried in Baptism, Romans 6:4. I was shocked when I read Colossians 2:12, I’ve got to be buried! I could see why the preacher buried that girl completely under the water, because that’s simply the way the New Testament told him to do it. Someone made the statement to me today, “Why you couldn’t say that baptism was burial, because if it was, how could you take an infant and put it down under the water?” Friends, baptism wasn’t meant for infants. Some people are going to say; now you watch what you’re saying. The plan of salvation is very simple, and I’m going to briefly outline it now. I know that I must hear the word of God, Romans 10:17, “So then Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.” When I hear the word of God and am ready to repent of my sins I confess Jesus Christ as did the Eunuch in Acts the 8th chapter, then I’m ready to be buried by baptism for the remission of my sins. Now you tell me what child that is one week, or one year old can hear the word of God and understand it, and is willing to repent of its sins, who’ll confess with the mouth Christ as did the Eunuch, and say now I want to be buried by baptism as Jesus Christ commanded. See, it wasn’t meant for children. Any person who says that a child is born with original sin on its soul is saying something that neither you nor I can find in the word of God. It’s just not there. Are you going to follow God, or are you going to follow man?* (*Ezekiel 18:29)

PAPAL INFALLIBILITY

The next thing that bothered me in the Seminary and still bothers me today, is Papal Infallibility. That’s a big term, it doesn’t really mean much, it simply means that the Pope is infallible. You would think that if the Pope was sanctioned by the Bible you could trace it all the way back to New Testament times, but you can’t trace the Pope back, and find any authorization for Popes to start with. Anyway, they teach that the Pope of Rome is infallible. What does this mean to the average person who doesn’t know much about the Catholic Church? I have studied Papal infallibility and I thought it meant that the Pope had always been infallible from the beginning. Well, they’ll argue it both ways. Some will say he was, some will say he was not. You show them a case where two popes contradict each other and they say “Oh they weren’t infallible,” but when you show them the whole situation they’ll say “Yes, we’ve had infallibility since the time of Peter.” Infallibility was defined by the Vatican Council in 1870. Here is the way men at the Council voted on it. 541 said we will accept infallibility; 88 voted against it; 62 said they would accept it if modified; and 70 wouldn’t vote at all. Yet they say they’re unified on everything, but they weren’t united on this particular teaching. I want somebody to show me where infallibility of the Pope is taught in the New Testament.

Let me give you an example of what infallibility is, so we will better understand it. On August 15, 1950 the Pope declared that Mary ascended bodily into Heaven. That then became an official doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church. On August 14, 1950 a parish priest in the United States, say a Jesuit, says from his pulpit that Mary did not ascend into Heaven bodily. On August 15 the Pope declares that she did, and he declares it by his infallibility. On August 16 you know what has to happen. August 16 that same Jesuit priest has to say that she did go up bodily, if he doesn’t he will be excommunicated from the Catholic Church.

Now let me say this. The Catholic Church does not teach that the Pope cannot sin. It teaches that he can sin. In fact, whether you know it or not, the Pope of Rome goes to confession everyday of his life. What he confesses I don’t know. In Mr. Connell’s New Baltimore Catechism #3, Question 403, page 97, “When does the Church teach infallibility? The Church teaches infallibility when it defines, through the Pope alone, as the teacher of all Christians, or through the Pope and bishops a doctrine of faith or morals to be held by all the faithful.” We go on to Question $406, “Must we accept the teaching of the Pope, which are not infallible. We must accept the teachings of the Pope which are not infallible, because they are wise and just, and since he gives them with authority, then we must accept out of obedience, though not out of faith.” Now see what this doctrine teaches. It teaches that what the Pope says you have to do as a Catholic, you must do it. We might go on further if time permitted and read some of the other questions. Here is one. From Mr. Cassilly’s book page 421: I said the Pope can sin—Catholics teach that he can.

Question 32: “When is the Pope infallible? The Pope can do wrong or commit sin as any other person, hence he is not impeccable. Moreover, in his private capacity he could hold false opinions even on matters of faith.” Now look at this. The Pope can have a private opinion on a matter of faith, he can preach it—here it goes—”it was possible also for him to deviate from truth in giving a sermon or in writing a book.” (Notice this now.) “But when acting in his official capacity as teacher of the Church, he is preserved by the assistance of the Holy Ghost from falling into error.” If you have a Bible, turn to Colossians 1:18. Now Paul, the writer, an inspired man of God, must have been ignorant on this point, because he didn’t know this. Paul said that “He (Christ) is the head of the body”, and that body is the Church. He never said that anybody in Rome was. Paul said that Christ is the head of the body, the Church. Colossians 1:18. Ephesians 1:22-23 is another example of a teaching that was here before Catholicism!

Just what power does the Pope have over Catholics today? You know, it worries me sometimes, especially on this point. People say, “Young man, you don’t know what you are talking about, what power could he have over people in America when he is in Rome?” I wish you could have been in the seminary with me. You would have learned a little about the power of the Pope. Every Cardinal, Bishop, Priest, Nun and Brother in the world today is under the jurisdiction and has to take orders from the Pope of Rome. Let me give an example to show just how complete his power is. Had I stayed in the seminary and had been ordained a Catholic priest, the Pope could have sent word to New York and said Cupp goes to China—Cupp would have gone to China, or he could have said send Cupp to Africa and let him teach down there, and Cupp would have gone to Africa. On the other hand, he could have said, We’ll keep Cupp in the United States and Cupp would have stayed in the United States. He has that same power over every Priest, every Nun and Bishop in the Catholic Church.

Another illustration will show you what I mean. A cloister nun is a woman who devotes her life never to leave the walls of the convent after she enters.* Never to come (*Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 4, p. 61) out and have contact with the outside world. Not too long ago, a cloister nun in New York had to have an operation. But before she could have that operation, she had to have permission from the Pope in Rome to leave the convent. That may startle you, but that is the power that he has over every religious member of the Catholic Church. Somebody says, “Now wait a minute Brother Cupp. You are talking about Priests, Nuns and Bishops, What about the average Catholic citizen?” Let me read you something to answer your question. Pope Leo the 13th, in his letter entitled, “Chief Duties of Christian Citizens”, says this (and it applies to a Catholic tonight): “Catholics owe complete submission and obedience of will to the Church and to the Roman Pontiff as to God himself.” You can ask any priest about this letter and you will find that statement in there.

As we bring this lesson to a close tonight, we are going to have an open forum, and answer questions after we sing a song of invitation. “Brother Cupp, just what are the future plans of Rome?” I can’t answer that completely. But I remember as perhaps some of you do, that I was living in Tampa, Florida in the fall of 1951, and a newspaper article came out at that time. It said the Pope of Rome (you can check this) wanted to build an army and an air force and a navy. You know, Jesus answered that argument pretty well in John 18:36. He said, “My kingdom is not of this world.”

What about the Catholic Church in America? The Constitution, thank God, provides for separation of church and state. I’ll tell you tonight that this is not the aim of the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church will be happy (and they will admit it) when Church and state are one. There are some very good books out on that. A man by the name of Paul Blanchard did some excellent research on the Catholic Church and put out two books that are great—just full of facts. These give an excellent insight into the political aspect of the Catholic Church.

As for the church and state being one, I have here in my hand a United Press dispatch release—it was in the Miami Herald. The date is August 7, 1953. The headline is: “Catholicism is declared Spain’s Only Religion”. It goes on to say, “Spain and the Vatican signed a concordat today which declared that Roman Catholicism is the ‘only religion’ in Spain and guaranteed the teaching of the Catholic religion in all schools.” The third paragraph goes on to say, “The thirty-six article pact, text of which has not been released, extends to the government of Generalissimo Francisco Franco to the Spanish branch of the church and to the Spanish language certain special new privileges”.

That may seem harmless enough in itself. I wonder what could result from this. I now want to refer you to an Associated Press dispatch, dated March 15, 1954, Barcelona, Spain. “Catholic Urges Crusade Against Protestantism”. Then we go on to read and see what happened when the Catholics got in over there. “Roman Catholic Arch-Bishop Gregorio Modrego of Barcelona called today for a ‘True Crusade’ against Protestantism in his diocese. In a pastoral letter made public today, the prelate said such a campaign was necessary because of increased Protestant propaganda and proselyting. He asked all parochial leaders to watch Protestants closely, and report to the authorities immediately all Protestant actions they considered not be in conformity with the Spanish Bill of Rights. This provides non-Catholics must worship in private. No external signs of their religion are permitted”. That is what happened. That is just one example of what the Catholic Church was able to do. I’m not saying that the Catholic Church will take over the United

States in the next ten, twenty or thirty years, but I believe with all my heart and soul (and I know from the official teaching of the Catholic Church which is no secret)* that the aim (*Marshall, C.C., The Roman Catholic church in the Modern State, p. 107) of the Catholic Church is to make church and state one in the United States. When I was in the seminary (now this is on me) I argued that point as loud and long as anybody—that we ought to use tax money to support parochial schools. I didn’t have any scripture for my arguments then, but I wasn’t worried about scriptures.

As I’ve been talking to you tonight, I haven’t tried to offend anybody. I would have preached the same sermon had my mother been in the audience. Every time I’ve preached this lesson, I’ve preached it with that in mind. I want to change her from that error and take her from the yoke with which she is burdened. As I study the teaching of the Catholic Church and look at some of their doctrinal books, I can’t help but thank God for the simple teachings of the New Testament.

Are you a member of some organization that is not mentioned in the New Testament? A denomination that Jesus Christ does not recognize” I beg you to think about these things, look at the proof that has been presented. These books are the official teaching of the Catholic Church, even though they conflict with the simple teachings of the New Testament. Let me ask you. Who are you going to serve? If you take your doctrine the belief that you hold to, and stack it up along side the word of God, then try to find it in the Bible and you don’t find it there—I just hope and pray that you will be man or woman enough to say to yourself, “Now, I’ve got to serve God—to put away the traditions and teachings that I’ve been holding to in times past”.

If you do not know, let me tell you what the plan of salvation is. It is not hard or complicated. I have outlined it briefly, but let me say again: Romans 10:17 tells me the wonderful news that faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. So I hear the word of God and believe it. What do I do then? I’m not saved yet. The Bible doesn’t say that-then I repent of my sins. The Lord said, “Except ye repent…ye shall likewise perish”.* I have heard God’s word, I believe it and I repent of my sins, then I (*Luke 13:3) what the Eunuch did in Acts the 8th chapter. I confess Jesus Christ with my mouth—that he is the Son of God, he came down, he made this plan possible. Then I do what the early people did in order to be saved. Some people say if you get this far that you’re saved, but I cannot find that in my New Testament, just as I can’t find many teachings of the Catholic Church. Acts 2:37, Peter was preaching to the people, and they wanted to know what they had to do to be saved. Peter told them to “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ”, in verse 38. I wonder if you are here tonight, willing to do that—obey that simple plan of salvation which will put you in the Kingdom of God. All you are going to need to know to be saved and help others to be saved is God’s Word. If you are here, subject to the Gospel Call, won’t you come, as together we stand and sing.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on September 26, 2015 in Church

 

Individual Christians without a church family…how can that be?


 placeforyou2mp3icon  YouTube JesusIsLordofthisWebSite575273_579331012148169_1163921425_n

 ——————————————–

In America, there are thousands of people who would classify themselves as Christians and yet they are not members of any religious body. To them, Christianity is something that you believe, something that you try to live at home and in business, but it does not entail being a member of a church.

church.peopleWhy is that the case?

  1. Because of divisions which have fractioned the religious world. There are more than 250 different religious bodies in the U. S. It is completely foreign to the pleas of unity, as prayed by Jesus in John 17.
  2. Disparity. The practice gap (how Christians live as compared to the way Christ lived). People look at Christ and are drawn to Him…they look at the church and it appears unappealing.

 The church is the grandest and most glorious institutuon on earth!!  

8 Reasons:

  1. It’s origin.

The church began in the mind of God rather than in the minds of men. It was not an afterthought!

 Ephesians 3:8-11:  “Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ, {9} and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things. {10} His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms, {11} according to his eternal purpose which he accomplished in Christ Jesus our Lord.”

  1. It’s foundation.

1 Corinthians 3:11: “For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ.”

 Matthew 16:13-18: “When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?” {14} They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” {15} “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?” {16} Simon Peter answered, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” {17} Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven. {18} And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.”

  1. It’s wonderful beginning.

We spent the summer looking at the major conversions from the book of Acts. Prophecies that it would begin in Jerusalem…great day of Pentecost…great sermon by Peter…thousands heard him…3,000 souls added to the church that day.

  1. Its relationship to God and to Christ.

The church is the people, not a building. Part of its glory lies in the relationship which Christians sustain to God and to Christ.

 1 Timothy 3:15: “…if I am delayed, you will know how people ought to conduct themselves in God’s household, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth.”

 The scriptures describe Christ as the bridegroom and Christians as his bride. A wedding is a special event…to see two people who love each other promise their love for life!

 That’s the picture Christ has with the church:

Ephesians 5:32: “This is a profound mystery–but I am talking about Christ and the church.”

  1. Its universality.

There is no one on earth excluded from the church.

John 3:16: “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.”

 Acts 10:34-35: “Then Peter began to speak: “I now realize how true it is that God does not show favoritism {35} but accepts men from every nation who fear him and do what is right.”

 Galatians 3:28: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”

  1. Its work.

The church has three main functions, and each is vital for the individuals reached: evangelism, edification, and benevolence.

  1. Its simplicity.

It’s wonderful to know that the organization of the church and the plan of worship are so simple that people can become Christians and serve God anywhere on earth — on ships, far-off military posts, as well as home in small towns and large cities.

  1. Its destiny.

John 14:1-3: “Do not let your hearts be troubled. Trust in God ; trust also in me. {2} In my Father’s house are many rooms; if it were not so, I would have told you. I am going there to prepare a place for you. {3} And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come back and take you to be with me that you also may be where I am.”

 Christians are on a journey. Earth is not our home. Sometimes its frightening to read in those last chapters of Revelation of the books which will be opened at the judgment. No one will enter into heaven except those who are written in the Lamb’s book of life.

 It need not be frightening, for it’s within our power to accept God’s grace and be certain that our names are written there. A response of faith that leads to baptism…and we become part of his church. May we never lose sight of its glory!!!

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 17, 2015 in Church

 

How to Keep Hope Alive During a Marriage Crisis


 placeforyou2mp3icon    YouTube JesusIsLordofthisWebSite575273_579331012148169_1163921425_n

 ——————————————–

During a marriage crisis, you can feel like your whole world is falling apart and all of your dreams are being shattered. Hearing the words “I don’t love you anymore,” “I want a divorce,” or “I don’t know if I want to stay married” can leave you reeling from the shock.

Marriage-CrisisMany feelings surface after the initial stunned reaction: anger, fear, anxiety, confusion, resentment, bitterness, desperation, and depression. Everything seems mixed up and slightly unreal, as though this is really happening to someone else, not to you. But, unbelievably, it is happening to you.

This is when you have to use every ounce of courage and strength that you possess and a lot that you didn’t know you had until now. Immediately, you have to create space for some private time so that you can take care of yourself, regroup, and create a plan of action.

You might need to take a day off from work, spend some time talking with a close friend, buy a notebook and start writing down your feelings and thoughts, or take a long walk in the park. Another option is to call and schedule a counseling appointment for yourself as soon as possible.

Next, spend some time thinking about how you’ll handle the situation. Your goal is to buy time so that your spouse doesn’t bolt out of the door prematurely. You want to slow things down so that your spouse can have time to reconsider and, if at all possible, agree to go to counseling with you.

During this time of crisis, you will have to be the “guardian of the marriage flame.” It will be up to you to keep hope and love alive so that the fire won’t go out. You can complain that it’s not fair and that it shouldn’t be this way.

But the bottom line is that if you want to save your marriage and your partner wants out, it’s going to be up to you to take positive action. During the crisis, you’ll need to be willing to do much more than your fair share to keep your marriage alive.

And that means that despite your fear and anxiety, it’s up to you to keep hope alive—hope that your marriage will make it—hope that your partner will change his or her mind—hope that your marriage can survive this and be even better than ever.

Here are some tips on how to keep hope alive and cope during this time:

  1. Don’t give up on your marriage no matter what your spouse has said. People often change their mind. No situation is hopeless if at least one partner is willing to do whatever it truly takes to preserve the marriage.

There is always hope that your marriage can be transformed by loving energy. Many spouses reconsider their initial impulse to leave and decide that they have invested too much time and energy to just throw their marriage away without at least trying marriage counseling.

  1. Don’t take everything your spouse says personally. People often say extreme things when they are upset or trying to justify what they’re doing. A partner who feels guilty about telling you she wants a divorce may get really angry instead. A spouse who has never expressed his true feelings about things may finally explode with a long list of your faults through the years.
  1. Really anchor in your mind that how you react to the situation will have a major impact on how things go from here. If you keep badgering a spouse who wants some emotional space, you are giving her the perfect excuse to go ahead and leave. You can’t control what your spouse chooses to do or not to do, but you can control how you choose to handle the situation.
  1. Allow yourself to be “confused.” If your spouse asks what you’re going to do next, just say that you’re confused and need time to think, that you don’t want to make any rushed decisions. Being “confused” can defuse a spouse who is just waiting to pick a fight. It also buys you some time.
  1. Honor your spouse’s request for emotional space, if that is an issue. Back off and take some time to regroup, stabilize yourself, and take the spotlight off of your partner for the time being. You have much to lose if you let your anxiety take over and demand immediate answers to difficult questions.
  1. Make a list of all the different things you can do to ground yourself and get more balanced emotionally and physically. Include things like working out at the gym, getting a massage, walking or hiking, letting close friends be supportive, listening to inspirational tapes on the way to work, reading books about people who have survived hard times, receiving power from your spiritual roots and connections, attending services at your church, temple, or mosque, or starting individual counseling sessions. Then make plans to implement the ones you think will help the most.
  1. Decide that whatever happens in your marriage, it’s important to you to know that you gave it your best shot and that you tried everything you knew to do. So instead of trying to constantly try to figure out what the odds are that your marriage will survive, instead put your energy into doing what you can in a helpful way every day. Be proactive and take positive action.
  1. Start expanding your life to include some new interests and activities. Don’t wait until everything is settled about your marriage before you start enjoying as much of your life as you can. Your marriage situation may be unresolved, but that doesn’t mean you need to brood and obsess about it all the time. Stretch yourself to broaden your world. When you are enjoying yourself by participating in activities that interest you, you become more interesting to others, including your spouse.
  1. Make a conscious choice to remain positive and to have the expectation that something good and helpful will come out of this experience in the long run. Your expectation will affect what happens. If you are doubtful, the energy of doubt will permeate your efforts. Tell yourself that there’s always a creative solution to any problem. Trust in your ability to be creative, flexible, and resilient.
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 10, 2015 in Marriage

 

A Smile for Married Folks…


 placeforyou2mp3icon YouTube JesusIsLordofthisWebSite575273_579331012148169_1163921425_n

 ——————————————–

HIS: Sometimes women are overly suspicious of their husbands. When Adam stayed out very late for a few nights, Eve became upset. “You’re running around with other women,” she charged. “You’re being unreasonable,”

Adam responded. “You’re the only woman on earth.” The quarrel continued until Adam fell asleep, only to be awakened by someone poking him in the chest. It was Eve. “What do you think you’re doing?” Adam demanded. “Counting your ribs,” said Eve.

——————————-

husband and wife jokes(1)HERS: A man was sitting quietly reading his paper one morning, peacefully enjoying himself, when his wife sneaked up behind him and whacked him on the back of his head with a huge frying pan.

 MAN: “What was that for?”

 WIFE: “What was that piece of paper in your pants pocket with the name Marylou written on it?”

 MAN: “Oh honey, remember two weeks ago when I went to the horse races? Marylou was the name of one of the horses I bet on.”

 The wife looked satisfied, apologized, and went off to work around the house. Three days later the man was once again sitting in his chair reading and his wife repeated the frying pan swatting.

 MAN: “What was that for this time?”

 WIFE: “Your horse called.”

 “. . . be sure your sin will find you out ” – Numbers 32:23

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 3, 2015 in Family, Marriage

 

Research shows parenting approach determines whether children become devoted Christians


 placeforyou2mp3iconFacebook    YouTube 575273_579331012148169_1163921425_n

 ——————————————–

In 2007, George Barna released a new book on a familiar topic, based on an unusual research study that indicates that there are six critical dimensions involved in raising children to become spiritual champions.

family and crossIn a newly published study on raising children, entitled Revolutionary Parenting, the renowned researcher serves up the latest in a long line of books that have been written on the topic. Barna noted that there are so many books on the subject that it would require releasing ten new books about parenting every day of the year for each of the next 21 years to equal the total number of volumes already available!

Reluctant to add to the glut, the award-winning author nevertheless produced his latest book because his research among children and parents produced such significant results that it seemed inappropriate not to publish the work.

Distinctive Research

Most research on parenting has relied upon psychological theories or cultural expectations as the foundation for recommendations. In contrast, Barna’s latest work is based on a multi-year study among children who have grown up to reflect specific characteristics.

“Our strategy was to start by identifying desirable attributes that parents would want to see in their children, then work backwards from the existence of those attributes in young adults to figure out what produced them. We expected that studying people in their twenties who exhibited such qualities would reveal some common practices that the parents of such children had implemented,” Barna explained. “We surveyed thousands of young adults in order to identify several hundred whose lives reflected the desired outcomes, then interviewed both them and their parents to determine the relevant parenting perspectives and practices. The result was not only clear but quite challenging.”

Another unique feature of Barna’s research was the assumption that people are created primarily for spiritual purposes. Consequently, the young adults who formed the foundation of the study met some unusual standards:

  1. Knowing, loving, and serving God was identified as their top priority in life.
  2. They described their faith in God as being of the highest importance.
  3. Each of these young adults possessed a “biblical worldview,” based on their responses to a series of questions about their view of life. In essence, they contend that absolute moral truth exists; such truth is defined in the Bible; God is the all-knowing and all-powerful creator and ruler of the universe; faith in Jesus Christ is the only means to salvation; Satan is a real being; Jesus Christ lived a sinless life on earth; and all of the principles taught in the Bible are true and accurate.
  4. They believe that their main purpose in life is to love God with all their heart, mind and strength.
  5. They are currently active in a vibrant community of faith, as demonstrated by their consistent engagement in worship, prayer, Bible study and spiritual accountability.

One of the most sobering outcomes of the research was that less than one out of every ten young adults in the U.S. meets these simple criteria.

Upon identifying a sample of people between the ages of 21 and 29 who satisfied these standards, Barna’s research team then conducted extensive interviews with them regarding how they were raised. After finishing those conversations, the researchers proceeded to interview the parents of those young adults, seeking additional insights into the tactics used by those parents.

“It’s one thing for a professional to write about theoretical approaches or for someone to describe their personal ideas or experiences on how to raise a child,” the California-based author explained. “It’s quite another thing, however, to identify a desired outcome and work backwards to uncover its genesis, in order to figure out the likely causes of such an outcome. I chose the latter approach because theories should be the product of outcomes. Unfortunately, much of the literature about parenting is based on theories or experiences that are divorced from significant scientific proof that they produce the desired result.”

Three Types of Parenting

In Revolutionary Parenting, Barna notes that there are three dominant approaches to parenting currently operative in the United States.

Parenting by default is what Barna termed “the path of least resistance.” In this approach, parents do whatever comes naturally to the parent, as influenced by cultural norms and traditions. The objective is to keep everyone – parent, child, and others – as happy as possible, without having the process of parenting dominate other important or prioritized aspects of the parent’s life.

Trial-and-error parenting is a common alternative. This approach is based on the notion that every parent is an amateur at raising children, there are no absolute guidelines to follow, and that the best that parents can do is to experiment, observe outcomes, and improve based upon their successes and failures in child rearing. In this incremental approach, the goals of parenting are to continually improve and to perform better than most other parents.

Barna found that revolutionary parenting was the least common approach. Such nurturing requires the parent to take God’s words on life and family at face value, and to apply those words faithfully and consistently.

Perhaps the most startling difference in these approaches has to do with the desired outcomes. “Parenting by default and trial-and-error parenting are both approaches that enable parents to raise their children without the effort of defining their life,” Barna explained.

“Revolutionary parenting, which is based on one’s faith in God, makes parenting a life priority. Those who engage in revolutionary parenting define success as intentionally facilitating faith-based transformation in the lives of their children, rather than simply accepting the aging and survival of the child as a satisfactory result.”

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 27, 2015 in counsel