RSS

Category Archives: Article

Challenging The Atheist


An atheist is one who does not believe in God. He accepts the idea that
the universe as we know it came into existence by natural means. He looks
to evolution as part of the answer as to the origin of life and ultimately
of humanity itself. He claims that he is too intelligent to live by
superstition and suggests that faith in God as Creator of the worlds is
just that. He belittles those who live by faith and asks for proof. He
claims to only believe that which is rational and can be seen and tested.

Alas! That is what he wants others to believe about him as they admire
his intellect and reason. But does he really have it all figured out? Has
he found the answers to mans’ origin? Has he proved that God does not exist?

Christians have a God-given responsibility to so equip themselves that
they are “always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to
give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and fear”
(I PETER 3:15). It occurs to me that the atheist who mocks and ridicules
should at least do likewise; that he should “always be ready to make a
defense to everyone that asks him to give an account for the hopelessness
and despair that is in him…”.

THE UNBELIEVER LIVES BY FAITH
“…in order that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven; for
he causes His sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the
righteous and the unrighteous” (MATTHEW 5:45).

While the atheist denies that God has anything at all to do with the
sun or the rain, he still lives by faith in something. He plants his crops
believing that the sun and rain will cause his efforts to be rewarded.
Atheists mock faith, but still live by it. They put their faith in the
all-sufficiency of matter as they order their lives. The difference between
the believer and atheist is that the believer accepts that there is a
purpose being fulfilled by his life and that God has provided the means to
sustain his life. The atheist believes that his life is an accident and
there is no purpose being fulfilled and the fact that he can grow food is
just a lucky break.

THE ATHEIST BELIEVES IN SOMETHING ETERNAL
“Even from eternity I am He; And there is none that can deliver out of
My hand; I act and who can reverse it?” (ISAIAH 43:13).

The atheist scoffs at the idea of an eternal God without beginning. But
as he ridicules those who believe in a Supreme Being, he, himself believes
that something has always been. There simply is no other reasonable
alternative because something exists now and something cannot come from
nothing. So what has always been here if not God? The idea that matter has
always existed flies in the face of all we know about the physical laws and
properties that govern matter. Or, we could put it this way: The believer
holds that God created matter, life and mind while the atheist holds that
matter created mind, intelligence and finally the idea of God. Which is
more reasonable?

THE ATHEIST BELIEVES LIFE CAME FROM NON-LIFE
“I charge you in the presence of God, who gives life to all things…”
(I TIMOTHY 6:13).

People once believed that non-living matter could produce living
things. If dead meat were left to itself, sure enough living maggots would
appear. It was Louis Pasteur who first overthrew the false idea. He showed
that the maggots came from flies and not from the meat itself. Pastuer was
correct: living things come from living things.

A living thing coming from dead matter has never been observed and is
without any factual foundation at all, and yet this is exactly what the
atheist believes. The Bible affirms that life comes from life. This has
been observed time and time again without any exception at all. Again,
which is the most reasonable to believe?

THE ATHEIST INSISTS THAT DESIGN IN NATURE IS ACCIDENTAL
“O Lord, how many are Thy works! In wisdom Thou hast made them all; The
earth is full of Thy possessions” (PSALM 104:24).

The universe is a complex system. We can find order and design from the
most immense galaxies down to the smallest atom. We find amazing things
that animals do by instinct apart from which they could not survive. We can
predict the movement of heavenly bodies because of the physical laws by
which they are governed. We see with our eyes and hear with our ears and
sing songs with our voices. The various systems found in the human body
function not by accident but by plan. There were a series of articles in
Reader’s Digest which discussed this: “I Am Joe’s Heart”, Eye, Lung, etc.
Who could believe that Joe is here by accident and not by plan? The atheist
can.

THE ATHEIST CANNOT TRUST HIS OWN THOUGHTS
“Because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God
made it evident to them” (ROMANS 1:19).

Ask the atheist where thought comes from. He thinks there is no God, so
what is the source of human thought? Are his thoughts merely a product of
blind chance and random occurrences? One atheist put it this way: Thought
is “a form of vibration and sensation in the nerve fibers of the brain and
of the nervous system”. Get this: what you think is dependent only on how
your brain sloshes around! So why is the atheist so proud of his supposed
intellect if all he is and thinks is a product of random forces with no
purpose? He may talk about such ideals as morality and love, but if moving
lumps of matter is all we are then those ideals lose their meaning. If man
is only a purposeless machine that developed by accident then why be
morally outraged when one of them kills another?

And that brings us to our concluding point. We wonder why crime,
brutality and violence are on the increase. We shudder as we witness so
many hopeless and aimless lives being wasted. We see emotional wrecks
unable to cope. What is happening? We are reaping the first fruits of atheism.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on October 3, 2014 in Article

 

Evidence for God’s Existence


No doctrine or aspect of theology is more basic than the doctrine of God, sometimes referred to as Theology Proper. Since the term theology (the study of God) is often used of the study of other biblical subjects like the Bible, angels, man, salvation, and so on, Theology Proper is the designation sometimes used for just the study of God Himself. Rather than an exhaustive treatment, the study which follows is designed to be a general overview of the key features of what the Bible teaches about God, His existence, Persons, and attributes of the Triune God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Here is an essential part of the foundation needed for solid spiritual growth and insight into life in general and into the Christian life in particular.

Jeremiah 9:23-24 Thus says the Lord, “Let not a wise man boast of his wisdom, and let not the mighty man boast of his might, let not a rich man boast of his riches; 24 but let him who boasts boast of this, that he understands and knows Me, that I am the Lord who exercises lovingkindness, justice, and righteousness on earth; for I delight in these things,” declares the Lord.

This study will be helpful for the new Christian or anyone who needs to get a handle on the essential elements of the doctrine of God. It will also benefit those looking for a review of these essentials, perhaps for Sunday school teachers in the preparation of material for their classes, or for those training disciples.

The Possibility of the Knowledge of God

The Bible gives witness to two facts regarding the knowledge God. First, it teaches us that God is incomprehensible, and but then it also declares that God is knowable. Both are true, but not in an absolute sense. To say that God is incomprehensible simply means that finite man cannot know everything there is to know about God who is an infinite being. To say that God is knowable means that, though incomprehensible, God can be known and man can grow in the knowledge of God, at least in a limited sense and to the degree that is needed for man to trust God and have a personal and growing relationship with Him.

God’s incomprehensibility is declared in passages like Job 11:7 and Isaiah 40:18:

Job 11:7 Can you discover the depths of God? Can you discover the limits of the Almighty?

Isaiah 40:18 To whom then will you liken God? Or what likeness will you compare with Him?

The fact that God is knowable is evidenced by the very gift of the Bible as God’s revelation of Himself to man, but note also the following passages:

John 14:7 If you had known Me, you would have known My Father also; from now on you know Him, and have seen Him.

John 17:3 And this is eternal life, that they may know Thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom Thou hast sent.

1 John 5:20 And we know that the Son of God has come, and has given us understanding, in order that we might know Him who is true, and we are in Him who is true, in His Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God and eternal life.

The Importance of This Study

Unfortunately, many are turned off by the term “doctrine” or “theology.” For many people these two terms mean something boring, impractical, and useless, but nothing could be more removed from the truth. Bible doctrine, the teaching of the Bible as God’s supernatural revelation to man, is the necessary foundation for knowing and understanding God, His creation (including man himself), and His plan for mankind. People, whether they realize it or not, have a set of presuppositions which form their doctrinal viewpoint or theological perspective about God, the world, and man himself. And this viewpoint, whether picked up through formal instruction or simply by the process of osmosis from their culture, is not without serious repercussions on the way people think and act. People eventually become like whatever god they worship. Concerning idols, the Psalmist wrote, “Those who make them will be like them, and so will all who trust in them” (Ps. 115:8 NIV).

The late Francis Schaeffer wrote of the significance of one’s world view, which, in the final analysis, represents one’s doctrinal perspective about God and life:

There is a flow to history and culture. This flow is rooted and has its wellspring in the thoughts of people. People are unique in the inner life of the mind—what they are in their thought world determines how they act. This is true of their value systems and it is true of their creativity …

People have presuppositions, and they will live more consistently on the basis of these presuppositions than even they themselves may realize. By presuppositions we mean the basic way an individual looks at life, his basic world view, the grid through which he sees the world. Presuppositions rest upon that which a person considers to be the truth of what exists. People’s presuppositions lay a grid for all they bring forth into the external world. Their presuppositions also provide the basis for their values and their basis for their decisions.

“As a man thinketh, so is he,” is really most profound. An individual is not just the product of the forces around him. He has a mind, an inner world …

Most people catch their presuppositions from their family and surrounding society the way a child catches measles. But people with more understanding realize that their presuppositions should be chosen after a careful consideration of what world view is true …

It is important to realize what a difference a people’s world view makes in their strength as they are exposed to the pressure of life. That it was the Christians who were able to resist religious mixtures, syncretism, and the effects of the weakness of Roman culture speaks of the strength of the Christian world view. This strength rested on God’s being an infinite-personal God and his speaking in the Old Testament, in the life and teaching of Jesus Christ, and in the gradually growing New Testament. He had spoken in ways people could understand. Thus the Christians not only had knowledge about the universe and mankind that people cannot find out by themselves, but they had absolute, universal values by which to live and by which to judge the society and the political state in which they lived …[1]

The many references in the New Testament to doctrine or teaching (83 times these words are found in the NASB New Testament) make it clear that doctrine or theology is not a cold and impotent force, but a vital element to the spiritual, moral, and social being of mankind (1 Tim. 1:3; 4:6, 16; 2 Tim. 3:10, 16; 4:2-3). Indeed, it is the difference between life and death, a sense of significance and happiness, and joy and peace. It is the doctrines of the Bible which bring people into a factual knowledge of the “true and living God” which must form the basis for knowing God personally. Only then can people turn from all the false gods of the world to the one true and living God (1 Thess. 1:9).

A healthy relationship with God must begin with an intellectual knowledge of who He is, which then matures into a deeper personal experience of knowing God in life. God manifests Himself to us on the mountain peaks, in the valleys, in the swamps—in all aspects of our lives.[2]

The study of the knowledge of God, just one of the many doctrinal themes in Scripture, is the greatest theme that can engage the mind of man. Nothing can even begin to parallel it in its impact on a man’s life. Undoubtedly, for this very reason, the very first words of the Bible introduce us to the reality of God as the source of the universe, “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” (Gen. 1:1).

These, the very first words of the Bible, are most basic to the understanding of the whole. No more important words have ever been uttered or written. Compton, the physicist, calls them the most wonderful words ever written. All else in the Bible stands or falls upon the validity and truthfulness of these words. Study of the person and work of God is of inestimable importance and value for all who would know the truth. Without a proper understanding of Him and His plan, everything else in the Bible and in life becomes hazy and meaningless.[3]

In his book Knowing God, J. I. Packer writes:

The world becomes a strange, mad, and painful place and life in it is a disappointing and unpleasant business for those who do not know about God. Disregard the study of God, and you sentence yourself to stumble and blunder through life blindfold as it were, with no sense of direction and no understanding of what surrounds you. This way you can waste your life and lose your soul.[4]

In John 17:3 Christ prayed these instructive words, “And this is eternal life, that they may know Thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom Thou hast sent.” Here was Christ’s own definition of salvation and life. Christ who was sent to be both the revelation of God to man and the reconciliation of man to God declares that knowing God is the essence of eternal life. But by eternal life Christ was not simply speaking of gaining an entrance into heaven, but of knowing and experiencing an eternal quality of life now, a life of meaning, purpose, and usefulness to God and mankind with peace and joy. All the real issues and questions of life ultimately find their answer in the knowledge of God which comes to man through Jesus Christ and the Scripture, Genesis through Revelation.

Before moving into the specifics of the doctrine of God, a few things should be said about theology as a whole.

Definition of Theology

The term theology is a compound of two Greek words, theos, meaning “God,” and logos, meaning “word, speech, expression, dis­course.” Both Jesus Christ as the Living Word and the Bible as the written word are the Logos of God. That which the living and written Word reveals is theology—a discourse on the specific subject of God. Though the word theology is never found in Scripture, it is Scriptural in character. In Romans 3:2 we have the words, ta logia tou theou, “the oracles of God,” meaning the discourses or utterances of and about God. In 1 Peter 4:11 we find logia theou, meaning “the utterances of God,” and in Luke 8:21 we find, ton logon tou theou, “the Word of God.”

Distinctions in the Types of Theology

In the use of the term theology several types develop depending on how the Word is used.

(1) A theological system: The word theology may be used of an exponent of a theological system as Augustinian, Calvinistic, Arminian, Covenant, or Dispensational theology.

(2)  A method, source, or content of theology: It may be used of the source or content of the theology or the method of theology as:

  • Natural theology—Facts concerning God and His universe derived from nature or creation.
  • Revealed theology—Facts concerning God and His universe derived from Scripture as a whole.

(3) Biblical theology: Facts concerning God and His universe as set forth in the various books of the Bible from whence we derive other classifications as Pauline, Johannine and Petrine theologies.

(4) Historical theology: The study of the historical development of doctrine as well as its variations and heretical departures.

(5) Theology proper: This is theology in its true and proper sense. Theology proper contemplates only the Person of God—Father, Son and Holy Spirit, existence and attributes without refer­ence to the works of each person of the trinity. This is a part of systematic theology.

(6) Systematic theology: This is the collecting, scientifically arranging, and categorizing, comparing, exhibi­ting, and defending all facts from all sources concerning God and His works.

For our knowledge of God to be accurate, the primary source must be the Bible, the special revelation of God, and the primary method must be the literal inductive method which is founded on a careful study of Scripture especially in the original languages in which it was written, Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek.

A true and accurate systematic theology must also be an exegetical theology and a revealed or scriptural theology. This is primary. Too often the study of theology is man-centered, i.e., centered around what the so-called great theologians have said, historical theology, rather than centered in the Bible. This does not mean we ignore the writings of these men as they have sought to represent what the Scripture teaches, but our final conclusions need to be based on Scripture itself as much as is humanly possible.

Divisions of Theology

These are the categories which should form a part of any system of systematic theology:

Bibliology: From biblos + logos. This is the study of the Bible, i.e., revelation, inspiration, preservation, canonization and illumination.

Theology Proper: From theos + logos. This is the study of the essence, being, and trinity of God.

Angelology: From angelos + logos. This is the study of angels, fallen and unfallen.

Anthropology: From anthropos + logos. This is the study of man, his creation, make-up, innocence and fall.

Hamartiology: From hamartia + logos. This is the study of sin, its nature, derivation and classifications.

Soteriology: From soterios + logos. This is the study of God’s plan and work of salvation for mankind.

Ecclesiology: From ekklesia + logos. This is the study of the church, universal and local.

Eschatology: From eschatos + logos. This is the study of prophecy and last things. Dispensations may also be included.

Christology: From Christos + logos. This involves the study of the Person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ, the God-Man.

Pneumatology: From pneuma + logos. This involves the study of the Person of the Holy Spirit.

Systems of Perception Used in Theology

Rationalism:

In rationalism reason becomes the sole guide in discovering and learning about God whether in Scripture or in nature. Here the supernatural is generally explained away by human reason and its bias against the supernatural, i.e., the supernatural is irrational to the human mind and must be rejected.

Empiricism:

This is the system of pursuing knowledge through observation and experiment. In the empirical system, everything must be checked out through the senses. One must be able to smell, see, touch, hear, or taste in order to know or come to a bonafide conclusion. The empirical method or the empiricist is one who depends on experience or observation alone, without regard to theory or faith.

Faith:

This is complete confidence in someone or something expressed in a non-meritorious way. Faith is the primary and Biblical means of perception (Heb. 11:3 “by faith we understand”).

Faith is the means by which we understand spiritual phenomenon. Spiritual phenomenon is an infinite subject beyond the exper­ience and reason of man. But faith is an infinite means of perception which alone is able to grasp the infinite. By the faith means of perception, a person reads the Bible, sees a fact of spiritual phenomenon and accepts it by faith. This becomes spiritual fact or truth by which an individual operates and has con­fidence. But is this rational? Does one have to put his brain in neutral with the faith means of perception?

(1) In Matthew 18:3 Christ said, “I tell you the truth, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven” (NIV). Children humbly accept a lot of things as true by faith, but always because they have confidence in a person, parent, or teacher. So with faith all biblical facts are accepted because of an underlying faith in God’s person and then in God’s Word. Faith begins with someone higher and greater than ourselves where rationalism and empiricism do not. They begin and end with man.

(2) Faith as a means of perception is not irrational, nor unreasonable, nor without evidence. So we read in Scripture that nature sings out the fact of God, giving constant evidence not only for the reality of God, but for something of the nature of God (Ps. 19:1-6; Rom. 1:19-20). The Bible holds fantastic evidence that its source is in God and that God has given us this book without error. For evidence of this, see the book, Evidence Demands a Verdict, by Josh McDowell, Campus Crusade.

(3) John came to the tomb in unbelief, saw the evidence within, reasoned, and went away in faith; but behind this were the previous words of Christ along with the evidence in the empty tomb (John 20:30-31). However, reason alone or rationalism, because of its bias, would say this cannot be true because it is supernatural, and this is unreasonable. Or empiricism alone would say—I have not observed it so it cannot be true, or unless I observe it, it cannot be true. Thomas, who doubted at first, may have been an empiricist (John 20:1-10, 26-31).

Illustration: The statement “the cow jumped over the moon” is irrational and cannot be believed because of what we have observed about cows and their limitations. But the statement “So the sun stood still and the moon stopped” (Josh. 10:13), though it defies our understanding, is not irrational because of what we know and believe about God. This is perception by faith.

False Views About God

The following are a few of the false views about God. These are either a product of rationalization or the failure of men to accept the Word of God by faith or both. They are the gropings of the human mind that operate on negative volition and as unaided by faith and God’s revelation (cf. Rom. 1:18-20). These systems reveal the truth of 1 Corinthians 2:14.

But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised.

Atheism:

Atheism is open and positive denial of the existence of God (Ps. 14:1). The word atheism comes from a + theos which means no God. It does not refer to a mere ignorance of God, but applies to one who considers himself informed on the claims and evidence for the existence of God and who emphatically denies them.

There are three types of atheist, practically speaking:

(1) The Absolute Atheist. This is one who denies the absolute existence of God. Here is the person who argues and says “I have examined all the facts as to the existence of God and I deny them as proving His existence.”

(2) The Providential Atheist. This is the person who simply doubts the existence of God, but firmly denies His providential dealings and the care of God for the things of this world. However, this person in effect denies the being of God for he strips Him of His omnipotence, wisdom, mercy, justice and righteousness. Why? Because of their desire to be uncontrolled in their lust patterns. This kind of atheist is sometimes called a Deist. In every atheist there is a moral twist (see Ps. 14:1f). He denies God be­cause he wants freedom from any responsibility for his sin. He is like the person who does not want to come to the light because his deeds are evil (John 3:19-20).

(3) The Practical Atheist. By this we refer to a secret or partial atheism which is present in the majority of the world. These do not actually deny the being of God, but by their actions and lifestyle, by their evil and neglect of God, or by the denial of certain aspects and rights of His divine and sovereign Being over them, they deny Him and act as though there were no God.

Titus 1:16 They profess to know God, but by their deeds they deny Him, being detestable and disobedient, and worthless for any good deed.

Agnosticism:

This word comes from a + gnosis which means “not knowing.” This school of thought does not deny the existence of God, only that there are no sufficient grounds (i.e., rational proof or empirical proof) that God exists—or that if God does exist He can be known. In reality it is an unwillingness to accept any of the sources of the knowledge of God (innate, tradition, nature, revelation), and an unwillingness to act in faith. Instead, it says I cannot know.

Materialism:

This is the system which tries to explain everything by physical causes which can be observed and understood. It denies and excludes any spiritual causes. Materialism is closely related to empiricism.

Polytheism:

Polytheism is a system of theology which believes in many gods. It has been claimed by unbelievers and by many evolutionists that all men were first polytheists and then evolved to monotheism. But the Bible shows that polytheism is a product not of evolution but devolution and degeneration. The idea found in evolution that monotheism, or the belief in one God, is a refinement of polytheism is contrary to the record of the Bible and even recent discoveries archaeologically. Scripture shows that polytheism is the product of man turning away from God and is specifically related to the deceptions of Satan as it is found in the false religions of the world. Polytheism is in no way similar to the biblical doctrine of the trinity which teaches that God is three in personality, but one in essence.

Pantheism:

This is the belief that God is in everything and that everything is God. This system confuses God with nature, matter with Spirit, and the creation with the Creator. Also, pantheism must not be confused with the omnipresence of God. The Bible teaches that God is every­where, but not in everything. God as Creator is independent of, distinct, and separate from the creation.

Deism:

The term “deism” is from the Latin word deus, meaning God, and is closely allied to the Greek word theos. This system acknowledges that there is a God, that He is personal, infinite, holy, and the Creator of all things, but denies that He sustains the universe. The Deist says that God just put things into motion. He is the Creator but not the Sustainer. Deism rejects the Scriptures, anything supernatural, and the idea that God is providentially working in this world.

Tritheism:

This is the doctrine that the Godhead consists of three independent Gods. This is a false view of the doctrine of the trinity, or better, triunity. Tritheism misses the oneness of the triunity of God.

There are many other false systems such as Positivism, Monism, Dualism, and Pluralism, but the plethora of these false systems simply show the futility of what the soulish mind can come up with when it tries to operate apart from the divine revelation of God. It is inconceivable, then, that God would leave man without a revelation of Himself.

Conclusion

The naturalistic arguments which debate the existence of God engender various philosophies. From these inconclusive and questionable theories the spiritual mind turns with relief to the complete, satisfying, and authoritative revelation of God set forth in the Bible.[5]

The Revelation of the Existence of God
(Opposed to Atheism)

Can a person prove that God exists? No, not really, but if we believe in the existence of God, we should be able to give reasonable evidences for why we believe what we believe. This section is designed to help us do that as well as aid in thinking about some of the ramifications of believing in the existence of God.

The message of the Bible, or the gospel, is always equated with truth and it is presented as the opposite of error. Further, the Bible teaches us that man can know the truth and that God holds man responsible to know it. God plainly holds men responsible for not receiving and believing the truth (Rom. 1:18; 2:8; 2 Thess 2:10-12). Such verses would be meaningless unless there was some kind of clear and objective evidence by which men could come to a knowledge and conviction of the truth. If such were not the case, God would not hold man responsible for there would be no way to tell truth from error.

Many like to make the claim there is no absolute truth or that you cannot know the truth. They claim you really cannot know truth unless it can be verified by observable scientific testing and data. Morally, philosophically, and theologically, everything is simply relative. This is agnosticism, but the agnostic’s position is really unsupported by the evidence.

Pilate’s reaction to Jesus’ statement when He was on trial may be an illustration of this not just because of what Pilate said, but because of what Christ first said to Pilate. Christ said, “everyone who is of the truth hears my voice.” Pilate then replied, “What is truth?” (John 18:37-38) Like all atheists, practical, intellectual, or philosophical, or like an agnostic, Pilate thought he could excuse himself from moral responsibility to God and humanity, or to truth itself by claiming truth cannot be known.

But in this statement, Christ shows us that knowing truth is ultimately a moral issue. Those who are of the truth, those who really want to know, can and will listen to the evidence that God has given us so that men may know the truth. The apostle Paul teaches us the exact same thing in Romans 1:18f. The fact is there is tremendous and bonafide evidence that there is a God out there, He exists. The problem is not one of evidence, but of rebellion and negative volition to God (Ps. 14:1; Rom. 1:21, 23, 25, 28; 3:9-18). It is a moral problem. The moral issue always overshadows the intellectual or evidential issues. As Paul Little writes,

It is not that man cannot believe—it is that he “will not believe.” Jesus pointed the Pharisees to this as the root of the problem. “You refuse to come to me,” he told them, “that you may have life” (John 5:40). He makes it abundantly clear that moral commitment leads to a solution of the intellectual problem. “If any man’s will is to do his will, he shall know whether the teaching is from God or whether I am speaking on my own authority” (John 7:17). Alleged intellectual problems are often a smoke screen covering moral rebellion.

A student once told me I had satisfactorily answered all his questions, “Are you going to become a Christian?” I asked. “No,” he replied. Puzzled, I asked, “Why not?” He admitted, “Frankly, because it would mess up the way I’m living.” He realized that the real issue for him was not intellectual but moral.

The question is often asked, “If Christianity is rational and true, why is it that most educated people don’t believe it?” The answer is simple. They don’t believe it for the very same reason that most uneducated don’t believe it. They don’t want to believe it. It’s not a matter of brain power, for there are outstanding Christians in every field of the arts and sciences. It is primarily a matter of will.[6]

Then why do we bother with giving answers and evidence for the existence of God or any other area that is questioned? First, because the Bible tells us to be “ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence” (1 Pet. 3:15). The reason for this is because people do have genuine doubts and questions and they deserve solid evidence.

John Stott struck a balance when he said, “We cannot pander to a man’s intellectual arrogance, but we must cater to his intellectual integrity.”[7]

Can we prove, then, that God exists? No! Not in the same way that you can prove something by scientific method in the laboratory by observable and repeatable experiments. However, observable data for the existence of God does exist. It exists in such degree and clarity that to deny it, one must deny his rational processes because of a bias against the supernatural and the issue of the moral twist spoken of earlier.

We must be clear from the outset that it is not possible to “prove” God in the scientific method sense of the word. But it can be said with equal emphasis that you can’t “prove” Napoleon by the scientific method. The reason lies in the nature of history itself and in the limitations of the scientific method, it must be repeatable … But history in its very nature is non-repeatable. No one can “rerun” the beginning of the universe or bring Napoleon back or repeat the assassination of Lincoln or the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. But the fact that these events can’t be “proved” by repetition does not disprove their reality as events.

There are many real things outside the scope of the scientific method as a means of verification … To insist that God be “proved” by the scientific method is like insisting that a telephone be used to measure radioactivity. It simply wasn’t made for that.[8]

So what is the evidence for the existence of God? The evidence falls into two categories: (1) General or naturalistic evidence—reasonable evidence from the world around us, and (2) special or revealed evidence—the evidence from the Bible. Though the evidence for the supernatural character of the Bible is a subject that comes under the doctrine of bibliology (the study of the Bible), there is tremendous evidence that the Bible is truly unique and the inerrant and infallible Word of God. It is not a book that man would write if he could or could write if he would (Lewis Sperry Chafer). Ryrie writes:

General revelation includes all that God has revealed in the world around us, including man, while special revelation includes various means He used to communicate His message in what was codified in the Bible. General revelation is sometimes called natural theology and special revelation is called revealed theology. But, of course, what is revealed in nature is also revealed in theology. Some writers use the labels prelapsarian for general revelation and postlapsarian or soteric for special revelation. However, both general and special revelation are (a) from God and (b) about God.[9]

Characteristics of General (Naturalistic) Revelation

As Ryrie points out, General Revelation, as the title suggests, is simply general and broad in the following ways:[10]

(1) It is general in its scope in that it witnesses to all people as the following passages suggest:

Matthew 5:45 in order that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven; for He causes His sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.

Acts 14:17 and yet He did not leave Himself without witness, in that He did good and gave you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying your hearts with food and gladness.

It is general geographically in that it encompasses the entire globe.

Psalm 19:1-4 The heavens are telling of the glory of God; And their expanse is declaring the work of His hands. 2 Day to day pours forth speech, And night to night reveals knowledge. 3 There is no speech, nor are there words; Their voice is not heard. 4 Their line has gone out through all the earth, And their utterances to the end of the world. In them He has placed a tent for the sun. (Emphasis mine.)

(3) It is general in its methodology since it uses a universal means, the varied elements of God’s creation like the heat of the sun and the human conscience, to declare the reality and glory of God (Ps. 19:1-6; Rom. 2:14-15).

Simply because it is a revelation that thus affects all people wherever they are and whenever they have lived it can bring light and truth to all, or, if rejected, brings condemnation.[11]

General or Naturalistic Arguments

The following arguments are drawn from natural revelation, from the world around us, in contrast to the revealed or super­natural revelation of the Scripture. This is bonafide evidence for God-consciousness as the Apostle Paul shows in Romans 1:19-20. The basic idea of these arguments is that as we study the world in which we live one can reasonably conclude that there must be a God. In the final analysis, however, one only comes to this conclusion by the perception of faith. Why? Because in spite of the evidence, one does not see God; one sees only the evidence of God, but not God Himself.

Illustration: When a man walking through the woods finds the tracks of a deer that has passed there only hours before, he knows that a deer was there because of the evidence of the tracks even though he does not see the deer. So (as with the tracks of the deer) we may know that God exists by the tracks He has left everywhere in the world.

The Moral Argument

Man has an intellectual and moral nature which demands God as his Creator. Man’s conscience, which is a law to man, necessitates a Law-Giver. Man’s free will implies a Great Will. Without God as the basis for right and wrong, no government would be possible except on the principle, “might makes right.”

Though it becomes defiled and seared by sin (1 Tim. 4:2; Tit. 1:15), to some degree all men have that faculty called conscience with its constant impulse to choose the right and leave the wrong. Society and government are based on this recognition of virtue and truth, but where does that come from? The only logical explanation is the existence of a God whose ways are holy, just, and good. A material universe without God as Supreme Governor would of necessity lack moral values and distinctions.

The Argument From Design (Teleological, telos, “end”)

The universe is a cosmos not a chaos. “Adaptation of means to an end imply a Designer.” Paley, the philosopher, used the illustration of a man finding a watch in the woods. If you found a watch and then found it also kept good time, you are forced to conclude that it had a designer (Isa. 45:18). How much more is this not true with the universe and its infinite complexity.

The earth itself is evidence of design. “If it were much smaller an atmosphere would be impossible (e.g. Mercury and the moon); if much larger the atmosphere would contain free hydrogen (e.g. Jupiter and Saturn). Its distance from the sun is correct—even a small change would make it too hot or too cold. Our moon, probably responsible for the continents and ocean basins, is unique in our solar system and seems to have originated in a way quite different from the other relatively much smaller moons. The tilt of the [earth’s] axis insures the seasons, and so on.”[12]

Another illustration is a stone wall. Rocks falling in a land­slide never form a properly placed, neat, uniform stone wall. Rather, such a stone wall proves design and a designer. So the world, in all its perfection and design, must have had a Designer. Stated in the form of syllogism the argu­ment is as follows:

  • Major Premise: Design presupposes an intelligent architect.
  • Minor Premise: The world shows evidence of design in every part.
  • Therefore: The world has a designer or intelligent architect, who is God.

The Cosmological Argument

The Greek word cosmos means “an orderly arrangement.” Every effect must have its adequate cause. The universe is an adequate cause, and the only sufficient cause is God. Where did the universe come from if not from God the Creator? Reason and probability are on the side of creation, not chance or mere force (Rom. 1:20; Acts 17:28-29). Stated in the form of syllogism the argument is as follows:

  • Major Premise: Every effect has an adequate cause.
  • Minor Premise: The world is an effect.
  • Therefore: The world has an adequate cause outside itself which produced it, namely God.

The Esthetic Argument

There is beauty in the universe and human beings have a unique ability to appreciate it. From whence comes this correspondence between the beauty in creation and the ability of man to appreciate it? This indicates design, intelligence, personality, and so, God.

The Ontological Argument (The idea of a supreme being)

Man not only has an idea of a God, but he pictures that God is a supreme being, one who is perfect, independent, and infinite. Where does this idea come from if there is no such being?

This argument is generally considered the most profound and Keyser in his book, A System of Christian Evidences, has an excellent statement:

We can not think of the relative without also thinking of an absolute. We can not think of the derived without also thinking of the underived. We can not think of the dependent without also thinking of the independent. We can not think of the imperfect without also thinking of the perfect. We can not think of the finite without also thinking of the in­finite.

Now, if these concepts are not true, and there is no perfect, absolute, infinite Being, then man’s thinking, in its deepest constitution is null and void. If that were true, all our thinking would be insane and futile. Can we believe that?[13]

Sometimes this argument is called, The Religious or General Argument with the argument going something like this: Since the belief in God and super­natural beings is universal even among the most backward tribes, it must therefore come from within man, it is something innate. The question is, could it have come from civilization or even from education when people all over the world possess it whether they are civilized and educated or not? The logical answer is no.

Then, where could such an idea come from if there is no God? There is always something to satisfy the desires which are common to the whole human race. There is food for the hungry, water for the thirsty, and a God for the thirsty soul. Stated in the form of a syllogism the argument is as follows:

  • Major Premise: An intuitive and universal belief among men must be true.
  • Minor Premise: The belief that there is a God is universal and intuitive among men.
  • Therefore: The belief that there is a God is true.

There are some very interesting facts regarding the universal belief in God.

(1) More than 90 percent of the religions of the world acknowledge the existence of one supreme being and some even anticipate God’s redeeming concern.

(2) In every case, this monotheistic belief predated other forms of worship or beliefs and heathenistic practices. This is true the world over on every continent.

(3) These other forms of heathenistic and polytheistic practices were invariably the result of failing to pursue the knowledge of God. Failure to pursue belief in the one Supreme Being created a vacuum into which false and demonic beliefs quickly rushed. As an illustration, ancient Chinese and Koreans had believed in a Supreme God who created all things. In China his name was Shang Ti and in Korea it was Hananim, The Great One. This belief predated Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism. It goes back 2600 years before Christ and worshippers throughout China and Korea seem to have understood from the beginning that Shang Ti/Hananim must never be represented by idols.[14]

Little writes:

It is very significant that recent anthropological research has indicated that among the farthest and most remote primitive peoples, today, there is a universal belief in God. And in the earliest histories and legends of peoples all around the world the original concept was of one God, who was the Creator. An original high God seems once to have been in their consciousness even in those societies which are today polytheistic. This research, in the last fifty years, has challenged the evolutionary concept of the development of religion, which had suggested that monotheism—the concept of one God—was the apex of a gradual development that began with polytheistic concepts. It is increasingly clear that the oldest traditions everywhere were of one supreme God.[15]

Biblical Evidence for the Existence of God

The Existence of God Is Assumed by Scripture

Perhaps because it is so evident everywhere, no writer of Scripture, Old or New Testament, attempts to set down arguments for the existence of God. It is a fact taken for granted. The Bible simply begins with “In the beginning God” (Gen. 1:1), and nowhere is His existence argued. Why? Because of the abundant evidence in the universe for the existence of God (Psalm 19:1-4), and because they that come to God must believe that He is. God is perceived primarily by faith as a result of positive volition (see John 18:37; 7:17; Jer. 29:13).

Heb. 11:6 And without faith it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who seek Him.

Biblical Theism

Biblical theism refers to what the Bible has to say about the reality, essence, and works of God, and it draws upon the marvelous revelation of God as it is found in the Holy Bible.

Biblical theism confirms the legitimate conclusions of naturalistic theism and also adds to it so much that is revealed only in the Bible. Though reason and revelation combine in any systematic theology, in approaching biblical theism certain assumptions are necessary.

Problems of interpretation of the Bible are recognized in systematic theology, but within orthodoxy there is no problem of the trustworthiness of Scripture … The Bible clearly reveals the existence of God who has all the attributes properly recognized in Deity.[16]

Regarding biblical theism Robert Lightner writes:

Since God did not seek to prove and defend His existence in His own Word, perhaps that is not man’s task either. We have been given the Bible which, while it does not seek to defend God’s existence before the skeptic or the unbeliever, does assume God’s existence and presents irrefutable evidence that He is, that He has worked in the past and is working today. In the Old Testament, for example, God’s existence and presence in the world is established by appeal to his­torical evidence (i.e., Ex. 4:1ff; 14:30f; Num. 14:11; Josh. 2:8-11, etc.). Also, in the Word of God we are told of His Son who came to reveal God to men (John 1:18). Surely, no one can read God’s Word with any degree of seriousness and go on denying the reality of God’s existence. Either God is all that Scripture makes Him out to be or the Bible is the biggest and most deceptive hoax ever compiled …

No doubt the strongest evidence for God’s existence in the Bible comes from the Lord Jesus Christ Himself. Let it be stated clearly again here by way of introduction, to deny the existence of the God of the Bible is to repudiate the Christ of Scripture.

The Son of God was the great Revealer of God. God also revealed Himself in the words of Scripture and in the miraculous deeds recorded there. Added to these evidences of His revelation it must also be said He reveals Himself to the believing heart through the personal experience of the Holy Spirit who “beareth witness with our spirits” (Rom. 8:16).

The revelation of God in the Bible reveals His infinite love and grace. But like His revelation in nature, apart from the illuminating ministry of the Holy Spirit the message will not be believed or understood.[17]

Conclusion

The big question is what does the fact of the existence of God means to us as human beings?

First, the knowledge of the existence of God means that man is put here by design. It means that while all God’s creatures have purpose, due to man’s particular uniqueness among the creatures of God, man has special purpose and meaning. We are not merely the product of time plus chance or some impersonal force. We are each the result of a personal God who created us for Himself with meaning and purpose. But the details of this purpose are found only in the Bible, God’s special revelation of Himself. Creation of course cannot and does not reveal this. Creation’s primary role is to give man the evidence and basis for God-consciousness (Ps. 19:1-6; Rom. 1:18-20).

Second, the knowledge of God means responsibility. The fact that there is a supreme and perfect being, a divine sovereign who created us for His purposes, means that we are each responsible to Him for the way we live and for what we do with the life He has given us.

Third, the knowledge of God’s existence means that we have the responsibility to search and seek to know God personally and intimately, to be thankful, and to worship Him accordingly (Rom. 1:18-23). The facts are, however, that man in his fallen state does not search for God, at least not on his own (Rom. 3:11). But in His grace, God constantly works to draw men to Himself (see John 1:9; 6:44; 7:17; 12:32; Acts 17:27-28; Rom. 2:4; Jer. 29:13; 2 Chron. 15:2, 4).

Sadly, most people, even with the conviction that God exists, live like practical atheists, as though God does not exist or as though He is indifferent to man. One of the reasons for this is the principle found in two passages: the principle of God’s patience and slowness to act against man’s sin.

Psalm 50:21 These things you have done, and I kept silence; You thought that I was just like you; I will reprove you, and state the case in order before your eyes.

Ecclesiastes 8:11-12 Because the sentence against an evil deed is not executed quickly, therefore the hearts of the sons of men among them are given fully to do evil. 12 Although a sinner does evil a hundred times and may lengthen his life, still I know that it will be well for those who fear God, who fear Him openly.

People think they are getting by or that God is just an old man sitting in the heavens who smiles on the indiscretions of His children. This can be illustrated by the hymns we so often sing. We sing hymns indicating our faith, but then live so differently.

  • We sing Sweet Hour of Prayer, but are content with 5 or 10 minutes a day.
  • We sing Onward Christian Soldiers, but a lot of Christians are AWOL.
  • We sing O For a Thousand Tongues to Sing, but often use the one we have in complaining.
  • We sing There Shall Be Showers of Blessings, but are ready to miss church when it rains.
  • We sing Blest Be the Tie the Binds, and let the least little thing sever it.
  • We sing Serve the Lord with Gladness, and gripe, gripe, gripe.
  • We sing I Love to Tell the Story, but are often embarrassed to mention it.

May we live and serve the Lord knowing that He truly is and lives as the sovereign and loving God of the universe.
[1] Frances A. Schaeffer, How Should We Then Live? Fleming H. Revell, Old Tappan, NJ, 1976, pp. 19-22.

[2] Gary E. Vincelette, Basic Theology: Applied, Wesley & Elaine Willis, John & Janet Masters, editors, Victor Books, Wheaton, IL, p. 15.

[3] Robert P. Lightner, The God of the Bible, An Introduction to the Doctrine of God, Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, 1973, p. 9.

[4] J. I. Packer, Knowing God, InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL, 1973, pp. 14-15.

[5] Lewis Sperry Chafer Systematic Theology, Vol. 1, Abridged Edition, John F. Walvoord, Editor, Donald K. Campbell, Roy B. Zuck, Consulting Editors, Victor Books, Wheaton, IL, 1988, p. 131.

[6] Paul Little, Know Why You Believe, InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL, revised edition 1968, p. 4.

[7] Ibid., p. 5.

[8] Ibid., p. 8.

[9] Charles C. Ryrie, Basic Theology, Victor Books, Wheaton, IL, 1987, p. 28.

[10] Ibid., p. 28

[11] Ibid., p. 28.

[12] Little, p. 11, quoting R.E.D. Clark, Creation, London: Tyndale Press, p. 10.

[13] Keyser, A System of Christian Evidences,  pp. 196-197.

[14] Richardson, Eternity In Their Hearts, Regal Books, pp. 63f.

[15] Little, p. 8, citing Samuel Zwemer, The Origin of Religion, New York, Loizeaux Brothers as the source of this information.

[16] Chafer, p. 135.

[17] Lightner, pp. 23-24.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on October 1, 2014 in Article, God

 

Errors of Hierarchical Discipleship


A study of Crossroadism, the Boston Movement, and the ‘International Church of Christ’

The doctrines and practices under discussion did not originate among churches of Christ. The Boston/Crossroads movement is merely a spin-off of a larger movement in the denominational world, based on a doctrine of discipleship which results in an authoritarian pyramid form of leadership.

Historically, the hierarchical discipleship movement may be the most revolutionary religious development of the twentieth century. This
dynamic movement is influencing denominations and religious bodies around the world.

It is comparable to the Methodist Movement of the eighteenth century.
Points in common are an emphasis on methodic routine in personal
devotion, militant evangelistic zeal, authoritarian hierarchical
organization, the forming of close-knit cells, and the direct involvement
of all members in evangelism.

Hierarchical discipleship is extremely versatile. It can be applied in
virtually any church or evangelistic organization. Being based on private
personal relationships, it can be introduced by stealth.

Although the movement began among denominational churches, it has spread
to churches of Christ in various forms. The Boston/Crossroads Movement is
not the only form this movement takes in our brotherhood. Some of the
same errors are also being promoted through ‘church growth’ and ‘soul
winning’ workshops and seminars.

The following questions will be discussed:
A. Why does God allow false teachers in the church?
B. What is the doctrinal foundation of this movement?
C. How were these ideas introduced among churches of Christ?
D. May we have a hierarchy?
E. What are the basic fallacies of pyramid discipleship?
F. How should we treat people in this movement?

WHY DOES GOD ALLOW FALSE TEACHERS IN THE CHURCH? 
Jesus said many false prophets would arise and lead many astray (Matt.
24:11). He also told us how to recognize them. Here are some
characteristics of false teachers mentioned in the New Testament.

Matthew 7:15-23
They appear righteous outwardly but bear evil fruits.
They say ‘Lord, Lord’ but do not do the will of God.
They think their ‘mighty works’ in the name of Christ prove that they are
acceptable to God, but in reality they are evildoers.

Matthew 20:25-28
They lord it over others and exercise authority over them like the rulers
of the Gentiles.

Matthew 23:1-10
They bind heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on men’s shoulders.
They do their deeds to be seen by men.
They love being called Rabbi by men.
They set themselves up as masters and fathers.

Matthew 24:24
They try to deceive the elect.

Romans 16:17,18
They cause divisions and offenses contrary to the doctrine which has been
taught.
They do not serve the Lord, but their own appetites.
They use fair and flattering words to deceive the hearts of the
simple-minded.

2 Corinthians 11:3,4,13-15
They preach another Jesus and have a different spirit.
They preach a different gospel.
They are deceitful workmen disguising themselves as apostles of Christ
and as servants of righteousness.

Galatians 1:6-9
They pervert the gospel of Christ and preach a gospel which is different
than the original gospel.

Galatians 2:3,4
They are false brethren who would take away our freedom and bring us into
bondage.

Colossians 2:4,8,16-22
They deceive people with persuasive words.
They cheat people through philosophy and empty deceit, according to human
tradition, according to the basic principles of the world.
They try to bind the old law on Christians.
They delight in false humility.
They are puffed up by their carnal thinking.
The regulations they make, according to commandments and doctrines of
men, have an appearance of wisdom in promoting self-centred religion,
false humility and neglect of the body, but actually are worthless.

2 Thessalonians 2:5-12
They use wicked deception.
They do not love the truth.

1 Timothy 1:3-11
They teach a different doctrine.
They desire to be teachers of the law without understanding either what
they are saying or the things about which they make assertions.

1 Timothy 4:1-4
They are hypocritical liars whose consciences are seared.

1 Timothy 6:3-5
They teach things which do not agree with the sound words of our Lord
Jesus Christ and the teaching which accords with godliness.
They are puffed up with conceit.
They are depraved in mind and destitute of the truth.

2 Timothy 4:3,4
They teach myths contrary to sound doctrine.

Titus 1:10-14
They are insubordinate men, empty talkers, and deceivers.
They teach myths and commands of men.

Hebrews 13:9
They bring diverse and strange teachings.

2 Peter 3:16,17
They twist the Scriptures to their own destruction.

2 John 7-11
They are deceivers.
They go ahead and do not abide in the doctrine of Christ.
They bring a different doctrine.

3 John 9,10
They like to have the preeminence.
They resist apostolic authority.

Jude 3,4
They do not proclaim the faith which was once for all delivered to the
saints.

Paul wrote that false teachers would arise both from without and from
within: “For I know this, that after my departure savage wolves will come
in among you, not sparing the flock. Also from among yourselves men will
rise up, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after
themselves” (Acts 20:29,30).

Peter gave the same warning: “But there were also false prophets among
the people, even as there will be false teachers among you, who will
secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Lord who bought
them, and bring on themselves swift destruction. And many will follow
their destructive ways, because of whom the way of truth will be
blasphemed. By covetousness they will exploit you with deceptive words”
(2 Peter 2:1-3).

Jesus said it would happen. Paul said it would happen. Peter said it
would happen. So it shouldn’t surprise us when it does!

Actually, God uses false teachers to test us: “If there arises among you
a prophet or a dreamer of dreams, and he gives you a sign or a wonder,
and the sign or the wonder of which he spoke to you comes to pass,
saying, ‘Let us go after other gods which you have not known, and let us
serve them,’ you shall not listen to the words of that prophet or that
dreamer of dreams, for the LORD your God is testing you to know whether
you love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul”
(Deut. 13:1-3).

Do you really love God? If you don’t, some false teacher will lead you
astray. Do you love the truth? If you don’t, God will send you a delusion
that you might believe a lie (2 Thes. 2:11).

People who love God are people who seek God and heed the Word of God
rather than the word of man: “And when they say to you, ‘Seek those who
are mediums and wizards, who whisper and mutter,’ should not a people
seek their God? Should they seek the dead on behalf of the living? To the
law and to the testimony! If they do not speak according to this word, it
is because there is no light in them” (Isaiah 8:19,20). In the New
Testament Peter gives the same charge: “If anyone speaks, let him speak
as the oracles of God” (1 Peter 4:11).

THESE TWO VERSES ARE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT. WRITE THEM DOWN (Isaiah
8:19,20; 1 Peter 4:11). WRITE THEM ON YOUR HEART. LET YOUR MOUTH BE
GUIDED BY THEM. “If anyone speaks, let him speak as the oracles of God.”
“To the law and to the testimony! If they do not speak according to this
word, it is because there is no light in them.”

Not only do these verses tell us to SPEAK according to the Word of God,
but also to KEEP QUIET otherwise.

This world is full of teachers who darken counsel by words without
knowledge because there is no light in them.

Listen carefully to the following quotation. A series of articles
entitled ‘Progressive Revelation’ appeared in the bulletin of the ‘Boston
Church of Christ’ from May 1st through June 5th, 1988. This is from Part
II which was published on May 8th. I quote: “Any religious group which
strongly emphasizes doctrinal accuracy runs a risk of losing perspective
and losing God. Historically, the churches of Christ have been noted for
such an emphasis. One of the mottos in the early Restoration Movement
was, ‘We speak where the Bible speaks and are silent where the Bible is
silent.’ If the Bible did not specifically authorize a given practice, it
was viewed with suspicion.

“This approach has led to a type of blind traditionalism because it has
essentially ruled out the idea that God will progressively lead His
church by granting new insights and applications. An insistence that we
must have ‘book, chapter and verse’ for anything new has virtually
guaranteed that we will have nothing new, even if the old is a failure.
Without a strong conviction that God is ACTIVELY leading His people both
individually and collectively, we are doomed to a stale, dying religion.

“A better motto for disciples who are ‘progressive’ (into making
progress) would be the following: ‘Where the Bible speaks, we are silent;
where the Bible is silent, we speak.’ Thus, if God has specified
something, we shut up and submit. But if He has not, then we have the
freedom to discover the most effective way to carry out His principles.
Success is of God. If He is truly leading us, we will not be
unsuccessful. PERIOD!” End of quotation.

Now what do you think of that? Where the Bible speaks, they are silent.
Where the Bible is silent, they speak. I rather prefer Peter’s motto:
“If anyone speaks, let him speak as the oracles of God” (1 Peter 4:11).
Or, as God said through Jeremiah: “He who has My word, let him speak My
word faithfully” (Jeremiah 23:28). God’s word is like a hammer that
breaks the rock in pieces (Jer. 23:29). Let us put this movement under
the hammer of God’s word. If they do not speak according to this word, it
is because there is no light in them.

I wish to make clear that my main purpose is not to be AGAINST certain
false teachers. My main purpose is to be FOR God and His Son, Jesus
Christ. Because I am FOR the truth, however, I must be AGAINST error.
Yet, it’s not enough to be against some error. I know brethren who are
strongly opposed to Crossroadism, who themselves do and teach things
which are just as bad, if not worse! The world is full of false teachers
and the church has its fair share. We must be able to recognize and avoid
ALL of them. The only way we can do this is to really KNOW THE TRUTH.

Search the Scriptures daily (Acts 17:11). Buy the truth and do not sell
it (Proverbs 23:23). “Trust in the LORD with all your heart, and lean not
on your own understanding” (Proverbs 3:5). I plead with you. Your eternal
salvation depends upon it.

Jesus tells us: “If you abide in My word, you are My disciples indeed.
And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” (John
8:31,32). If we don’t ‘strongly emphasize doctrinal accuracy’ we cannot
be disciples of Christ. PERIOD.

We have already learned that false teachers are to be expected among us,
that God allows this to test us to see if we love Him, and that false
teachers can be recognized because they do not speak according to the
Word of God.

WHAT IS THE DOCTRINAL FOUNDATION OF THIS MOVEMENT?
This movement is based on the thesis that Christ’s master/disciple
relationship with the twelve apostles is a pattern to be followed in
making, training and leading disciples today. According to this doctrine,
a true disciple of Christ will make other disciples who learn to follow
Christ by following him in an authoritarian teacher/student relationship.
This training includes teaching new disciples how to make other
disciples, and how to train and lead them in the same way. A chain of
these master/disciple relationships results in a pyramid.

Fundamental Error of the Movement
The fundamental error of the master/disciple movement is that Jesus
TRAINING HIS APOSTLES is used as a pattern for MAKING DISCIPLES, whereas
these are entirely different matters. Jesus made many disciples, not
just twelve. In Luke 6:17 we read of “a crowd of His disciples.”
According to Luke 19:37 “the whole multitude of the disciples began to
rejoice and praise God.”

From among His many disciples, Jesus chose twelve to commission and train
as APOSTLES: “And when it was day, He called His disciples to Him; and
from them He chose twelve, whom He also named apostles” (Luke 6:13). The
apostles occupy a unique position in the foundation of the church (Eph.
2:20; Rev. 21:14). The example of their being chosen, trained and
commissioned had no other equivalent in the first century and has no
equivalent in the church today.

What is a Disciple?
A disciple is a learner and a follower of the teachings of a master. The
word is used in various contexts in the New Testament. Not only Jesus,
but also John the Baptist and the Pharisees had disciples (Mark 2:18).

In a more restricted sense, the word is used as a designation for the
twelve apostles (Matt. 10:1,2). To avoid misapplication one must
determine from the context whether reference is being made to the twelve,
or to Jesus’ disciples in general. (For example, compare Matthew 19:23
with 19:28; Mark 6:35,45 with 6:7,30 and Mark 11:14 with 11:11.) Many of
the doctrinal errors of the authoritarian discipleship movement result
from a failure to observe this distinction.

In Acts 6:1,2 the church is spoken of as the multitude of the disciples.
At Antioch the disciples were for the first time called Christians (Acts
11:26). In other words, a Christian is a disciple of Christ.

In a more general sense, some people are called disciples in Acts 19:1-3
when they knew only the baptism of John and had not yet been baptized in
the name of Christ.

Incorrect Definition
Advocates of pyramid discipleship use an incorrect definition for the
word ‘disciple.’ They define a disciple as a Christian who is trained
through a subordinate relationship with another Christian. This
unscriptural definition results from an incorrect concept of how one
becomes a disciple of Christ.

‘Disciple’ as a Verb
Most advocates of hierarchical discipleship like to use the word
‘disciple’ as a verb. When they speak of ‘discipling someone to Christ’
they don’t refer to preaching the gospel so someone can become a
disciple. They refer to a period of training under the leadership of one
person.

Kip McKean of the Boston Church of Christ believes that a Christian
should ‘get discipled’ by some more mature Christian. In a lesson
entitled: ‘The Saints in the Kingdom of Light’ presented in England at
the 1984 ‘United Kingdom Missions Conference’ of the Central London
Church of Christ he indicated that it takes at least three years to
disciple a Christian to Christ. He also said the following: “Get
discipled by men. Most of you have discipling relationships. Some of you
don’t. You need to find them. It’s Biblically commanded. How could you
not have them? If you have them, get open. Like Moab say, ‘I’m just here
to learn.’ Get humble. Get submissive. Get loyal and learn. You’ve got
great people to learn from.”

“And I make it clear with the people I’m discipleship partners with, that
that’s the purpose of our relationship. I verbally say that: ‘I’m going
to disciple you to Christ,’ so the relationship is defined just like
Jesus defined it when He said, ‘Come follow me, and I’ll make you fishers
of men.’ They know what relationship they’re getting themselves into. And
if Jesus had to say it, don’t you think we have to say it? I think so.”

“You must have a discipling relationship with another man who is older in
the Lord to be able to help you become a strong Christian.” (These
quotations are from a cassette recording distributed by the Crossroads
Tape Ministry, Gainesville, Florida).

This idea of discipling a Christian to Christ is foreign to the New
Testament. In Greek there is a verb form of the word ‘disciple’ which is
found four times in the New Testament (Matt. 13:52; 27:57; 28:19; Acts
14:21). In the first two passages it is intransitive and means to be or
to become a disciple. In Matthew 28:19 and in Acts 14:21 the word is
transitive and means to make disciples.

On what do they base their definition of ‘discipling’ as one Christian
shepherding another Christian to maturity? Sometimes an appeal is made
to Ephesians 4:11-13 which teaches that a Christian is to grow to
maturity in the body of Christ. But that process is not called
‘discipling’ and nothing is said about a master/disciple relationship.
Another passage used is Luke 6:40. “A disciple is not above his teacher,
but everyone who is perfectly trained will be like his teacher.”
Actually, this passage proves their definition to be incorrect. Must one
be perfectly taught before he is ‘discipled’ to Christ? Is being
perfectly taught something one can attain during a three-year crash
course under some other disciple? Or is this a goal for a lifetime of
learning from Christ? And WHO is the ‘teacher’ in this verse? Some other
disciple or Christ?
Their wrong definition changes the goal into the prerequisite. There are
hundreds of disciples of Christ for whom I have great respect. But I have
yet to meet one who is already ‘fully taught.’ Becoming fully taught to
be like Christ is the goal of discipleship, not the prerequisite.
How Does One Become a Disciple of Christ?
People became disciples of John the Baptist and of Christ during His
earthly ministry by repenting and being baptized. At that time the
message of both was: “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand!”
(Matt. 3:2; 4:17). They who refused to be baptized “rejected the counsel
of God” (Luke 7:30). Jesus left Judea when the Pharisees heard that He
“made and baptized more disciples than John” (John 4:1).
Before returning to the Father He commanded His followers: “Go into all
the world and preach the gospel to every creature. He who believes and is
baptized will be saved” (Mark 16:15,16). In the wording of Matthew
28:19,20 they were told: “Go therefore and make disciples of all the
nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of
the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have
commanded you.”

It has been argued that since ‘make disciples’ (second person plural
aorist imperative active) is the main verb of the sentence and ‘going,’
‘baptizing’ and ‘teaching’ are participles, discipling includes both
baptizing and teaching to observe all things.

Whom are we to disciple? All the nations. Nations (accusative) is the
direct object of the verb ‘disciple.’ If ‘disciple’ as a verb means what
advocates of authoritarian discipleship claim, is it possible to disciple
a nation? Of course not. In most versions this verb is correctly
translated ‘to make disciples of.’ Then it makes sense. ‘Make disciples
of all the nations.’ That is possible.
Whom are we to baptize and teach to observe all things? Is it possible to
baptize a nation? Greek pronouns usually agree in gender with their
antecedent. ‘Nations’ is neuter; ‘them’ in verses 19 and 20 is masculine.
It is to be understood — as is stated in Mark — that only those who
believe are to be baptized. “He who believes and is baptized will be
saved” (Mark 16:16). And whom are you going to teach to observe all
things? One who doesn’t believe? One who refuses to be baptized? Or one
who has believed, has been baptized, and has been made a disciple? You
are not going to make much progress teaching someone to observe all
things until AFTER he has become a disciple!

Disciples ARE to be taught to observe all that their Master has
commanded. They ARE to grow to maturity in Christ. But this is not called
‘discipling’ in the New Testament. And the above passages certainly say
nothing about becoming the disciple of someone OTHER THAN CHRIST.
The way to make disciples is to preach the gospel. “When they had
preached the gospel to that city and made many disciples, they returned
to Lystra, Iconium and Antioch, strengthening the souls of the disciples”
(Acts 14:21,22). A subordinate relationship with some other disciple is
not required in ‘making disciples’ or ‘discipling’ (the verb form is used
in this passage).

“And the word of God spread, and the number of the disciples multiplied
greatly in Jerusalem, and a great many of the priests were obedient to
the faith” (Acts 6:7). When someone believes the gospel and is obedient
to the faith by repenting and being baptized he becomes a disciple of
Christ (Mark 16:16; Matt. 28:19; Acts 2:38; 6:7).

What were the results of Peter’s sermon on Pentecost? “Then those who
gladly received his word were baptized; and that day about three thousand
souls were added to them” (Acts 2:41).

In the New Testament, people became disciples by being obedient to the
faith, not by being trained in a subordinate relationship with some other
disciple.
Disciples were called Christians (Acts 11:26). One becomes a disciple of
Christ in exactly the same way one becomes a Christian. As a disciple
(learner) he will continue to grow and become more like Christ (Eph.
4:11-16).

According to the hierarchical discipleship movement one becomes a
disciple through authoritarian training under some more mature disciple.
According to the Scriptures one becomes a disciple by being baptized into
Christ. As a disciple, he grows to maturity in the body of Christ.

One Error Leads to Another
The fundamental error made by advocates of pyramid discipleship is to use
the example of Christ training His APOSTLES as a pattern for MAKING
DISCIPLES, whereas these are different matters entirely. This results not
only in a wrong idea as to how one becomes a disciple, but also in an
incorrect definition of a disciple. Other errors branch out from these
roots.

May Christians Have Disciples?
May we follow Christ’s example and train others by means of a
teacher/disciple relationship patterned after the relationship Jesus had
with His apostles?

We may not follow Christ’s example in everything. Christ is the Head of
the church. May we follow His example in this? (The Pope does!)
Adventists say we should follow Christ’s example and keep the Sabbath.

Neither may we follow the example of the apostles in everything. They
imparted the Holy Spirit by the laying-on of hands (Acts 8:18). May we
follow this example? (Catholic bishops and Pentecostals do!)

May we follow Christ’s example and teach others the same way He taught
His apostles? No, Jesus has EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN IT. “But you, do not be
called, ‘Rabbi’; for One is your Teacher, the Christ, and you are all
brethren. Do not call anyone on earth your father; for One is your
Father, He who is in heaven. And do not be called teachers, for One is
your Teacher, the Christ” (Matt. 23:8-10).

Both Jesus and John the Baptist were called Rabbi by their disciples
(John 9:2; 3:26). A Rabbi was a teacher who had a master/disciple
relationship with his students. According to the usual practice,
disciples might eventually become Rabbis themselves and have disciples of
their own.
Jesus tells His disciples, however, that they are not to be called Rabbi.
They would always remain disciples. He is the only Rabbi and His
disciples are all brethren.

When Jesus says we have but ONE teacher, it is the same word used in
other places to describe Christian teachers (Acts 13:1; 1 Cor. 12:28-30;
Eph. 4:11-16). What is the difference between what is allowed and what is
not allowed?

The word ‘Rabbi’ qualifies the meaning of the word ‘teacher’ in Matthew
23:8. We may have teachers in the church, but not Rabbis. In other words,
Christian teachers may not have disciples. WHAT JESUS FORBIDS IS AN
ORGANIZATIONAL TEACHER/STUDENT RELATIONSHIP AMONG HIS FOLLOWERS. And this
is exactly what is advocated in the authoritarian discipleship movement!

Jesus is our only Master Teacher. Teachers in the church may not have an
organizational position ABOVE the ones they teach. We are all brethren.

The word used in Matthew 23:10 for ‘teachers’ (also translated ‘masters’
or ‘leaders’) is not the usual word for ‘teacher,’ ‘master’ or ‘leader’
but is a word which is found only in this verse. It means a ‘guide
teacher.’

Members of the Orthodox Church are encouraged to find a ‘spiritual
director’ to help them grow. The concept is similar. Christ, however, has
provided evangelists, pastors and teachers to build up the body (Eph.
4:11). We are not to accept one certain person as our ‘guide teacher’ or
‘spiritual director’ to help us grow. Christ is our spiritual director,
no one else!

We may have teachers in the church, but not Rabbis or spiritual
directors. Teacher/disciple relationships have been forbidden by Christ.

May We Call a Brother ‘My Disciple’?
It is common in the authoritarian discipleship movement for one person to
refer to those he is training as ‘my disciples.’ Kip McKean stated at the
1984 ‘United Kingdom Missions Conference’ in London: “You must fall in
love with your disciple, that you are discipling to Christ.”

Jesus refers to His followers as ‘My disciples.’ In the New Testament no
Christian ever calls another Christian ‘my disciple.’

With reference to Paul we read in Acts 9:25, “Then the disciples took him
by night and let him down through the wall in a large basket.” One finds
‘his disciples’ instead of ‘the disciples’ in many modern translations.
These versions are based on certain manuscripts from the 4th and 5th
centuries which differ greatly from the majority of manuscripts. Not only
in the Received Text, but also in the ancient translations (Vulgate,
Syriac, Coptic, Ethiopic and Armenian) one finds ‘the disciples.’

It is beyond the scope of this lecture to discuss the relative merits of
manuscripts. We might ask however: Is it safe to base a practice on a
reading not found in most manuscripts? If ‘his disciples’ is correct,
then this is the only place in the New Testament where the word
‘disciple’ is used to describe a relationship between two Christians.

Even then we would have to bear in mind that Paul was an INSPIRED APOSTLE
(Acts 22:15; 26:16-18; 1 Tim. 2:7; 2 Tim. 1:11). Because we continue in
the apostles’ doctrine (Acts 2:42) there is a limited sense in which we
also might be called disciples of Paul. (See John 9:28 where the Jews
refer to themselves as disciples of Moses.) Since we are NOT inspired
apostles, however, even if Paul did have disciples, that would not
authorize us to have disciples.
As mentioned above, a common error of sectarians is to apply passages to
themselves which refer to the exclusive office of Christ or His apostles.

Paul warned against those who would try to make CHRIST’S disciples into
THEIR disciples: “For I know this, that after my departure savage wolves
will come in among you, not sparing the flock. Also from among yourselves
men will rise up, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples
after themselves” (Acts 20:29,30).

May One Christian Exalt Himself Above Another?
Jesus said, “A disciple is not above his teacher, nor a servant above his
master. It is enough for a disciple that he be like his teacher, and a
servant like his master” (Matt. 10:24,25).

According to Philippians 2:3 we are to be humble and to esteem others
better than ourselves. If you call a fellow Christian ‘my disciple’ you
are exalting yourself above your brother. If he is YOUR disciple then you
are HIS TEACHER in a way which violates Matthew 23:8-10.
Jesus also said, “It is enough for a disciple that he be like his
teacher” (Matt. 10:25). Is it enough for you to be like some other
Christian? Certainly not. That would be coming far short of being like
Christ. We have but one Teacher and we are all brethren. When we make
disciples, we are to make disciples of Christ, not disciples of men.

The Meaning of ‘My Son in the Faith’
It is argued that the biblical expression ‘my son in the faith’ is
equivalent to ‘my disciple.’ What Paul means when he refers to Timothy as
‘my true son in the faith’ (1 Tim. 1:2) is clarified in 1 Corinthians
4:15-17. “For though you might have ten thousand instructors in Christ,
yet you do not have many fathers; for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you
through the gospel. Therefore I urge you, imitate me. For this reason I
have sent Timothy to you, who is my beloved and faithful son in the Lord,
who will remind you of my ways in Christ, as I teach everywhere in every
church.” (See also Philemon 10 where Paul speaks of Onesimus as his son,
begotten during his imprisonment.)

The Corinthians were Paul’s children in the faith because he had begotten
them through his PREACHING OF THE GOSPEL. Others had helped them grow
after they became Christians. They had MANY INSTRUCTORS (not just one).
Paul’s expression ‘son in the Lord’ does not involve a Rabbi/disciple
relationship.

When someone responds to our preaching and becomes a child of God we are
in a sense that person’s “father” in the faith and he is our “child.” It
is also true that those who become Christians learn much by imitating the
faith of their teachers. But nothing indicates that a Christian is the
disciple of the one who taught him.

These passages must be understood in the light of the command of Christ:
“But you, do not be called, ‘Rabbi’; for One is your Teacher, the Christ,
and you are all brethren. Do not call anyone on earth your father; for
One is your Father, He who is in heaven” (Matt. 23:8,9).

What then is the difference between calling someone ‘my son in the faith’
and calling him ‘my disciple’? Simply this: The first expression, if
understood correctly, is Biblical and the second is not. I say ‘if
understood correctly’ because one could easily use these Biblical words
with a meaning different than Paul’s meaning. In the Catholic and the
Orthodox Church this passage is quoted to justify calling a priest
‘Father’! If you ‘beget’ someone by sowing the seed of the gospel (the
Word of God) in his heart then he is your child in the faith. But that
does not make you his master teacher. If he became YOUR disciple,
something was sown other than the Word of God. The Word of God produces
disciples of Christ.

Paul and Timothy
Some have argued that the training of Christians in a teacher/disciple
relationship is no different than the situation where young evangelists
work with more experienced preachers as Timothy and others worked with
Paul.

There is a great difference, however, between being the disciple of
someone and working with someone.

Timothy was already a disciple and was “well spoken of by the brethren”
before Paul invited him to accompany him (Acts 16:1-3). Paul’s purpose
was NOT to ‘disciple him to Christ.’ He refers to Timothy as his fellow
worker (Rom. 16:21) and his helper (Acts 19:22). He also calls him “our
brother and minister of God, and our fellow labourer in the gospel of
Christ” (1 Thes. 3:2). Timothy was Paul’s fellow worker, not his
disciple.

Paul uses similar terms for others who accompanied him. He calls Titus
his partner and fellow worker (2 Cor. 8:23). He refers to Philemon (whom
he had taught the gospel) as his fellow labourer (Philemon 1). Clement,
Aristarchus, John Mark, Justus, Demas, and Luke are all called fellow
workers (Phil. 4:3; Col. 4:10,11; Philemon 24).

A close personal tie developed between Paul and Timothy during their many
years of service together. Of him Paul wrote: “You know his proven
character, that as a son with his father he served with me in the gospel”
(Phil. 2:22). This resulted from their personal association, not from a
hierarchical form of leadership.

If a master/disciple relationship developed between an experienced
preacher and a young evangelist, that would be wrong. Some have also
tried to justify a teacher/disciple relationship by the example of Paul’s
letters to Timothy and Titus. But these are inspired letters from an
apostle! Expressions of Paul’s apostolic authority cannot serve as
examples for US to follow!

Was Paul a Disciple of Barnabas?
In an attempt to fabricate a hierarchical chain of discipleship in the
New Testament, many writers in this movement state that Paul was a
disciple of Barnabas.

This has no Biblical basis whatever. Paul was NOT a disciple of Barnabas.
The passages which tell of Paul’s associations with Barnabas do not
indicate that there was a master/disciple relationship between them. In
the early years of Paul’s ministry he was with Barnabas no more than two
weeks! (See Galatians 1:11-24 and Acts 9:26-30.) What Paul writes in the
first two chapters of Galatians indicates that he was a disciple of
Christ and of no one else!

Who is Your Spiritual Father?
“You are all brethren. Do not call anyone on earth your father; for One
is your Father, He who is in heaven” (Matt. 23:8,9).

In London, Kip McKean spoke about ‘spiritual fathers.’
“Yes, we need to be brothers. But sometimes we’re afraid of adopting the
pattern of the Bible and being a father in the gospel to someone, because
being a father is so much responsibility.”
“You know, I think that one of the things that I saw falling short as an
earthly parent that I see falling short with a lot of brothers as
spiritual fathers is that they don’t urge their brothers. There’s not a
hard-line discipline. And you can be buddy-buddy all you want, but being
buddy-buddy doesn’t change people’s lives. When you lay it out, when
you’re hard-line, then things change.”
“And when that man, that father in the faith, is hard-line it makes a
difference in their lives.”
(Cassette recording: ‘Saints in the Kingdom of Light.’)

In this lesson Kip McKean teaches that each Christian should have a more
mature brother as his spiritual father to disciple him to Christ using
hard-line discipline. Can we be true disciples of Christ while accepting
someone other than God as our spiritual father and someone other than
Christ as our teacher?

Certainly not. We would be trampling under foot the words of our Lord:
“But you, do not be called, ‘Rabbi’; for One is your Teacher, the Christ,
and you are all brethren. Do not call anyone on earth your father; for
One is your Father, He who is in heaven” (Matt. 23:8,9).

May We Be Followers of Men?
Although not affiliated with Boston, Milton Jones wrote a book entitled
‘Discipling: the Multiplying Ministry’ (1982, Star Bible & Tract Corp.,
Ft. Worth, Texas) which advocates these same ideas. In it he complains
that most Christians today would be hesitant to say, ‘Be followers of
me.’ He admits that some would even consider such to be blasphemy (Page
34).

It sounds like blasphemy to me. In an attempt to justify his statement he
quotes two verses in which Paul says, “Imitate me, just as I also imitate
Christ” (1 Cor. 11:1; 4:16). He also quotes from Hebrews where it is
stated that we are to imitate the faith of our leaders (Heb. 13:7). I try
to imitate the faith of fellow Christians. I think of J.C.Bailey (who
first went to India to preach when he was 59 and who after almost 30
years is still doing what he can) as one who has a great faith worthy of
imitation. But we may not be disciples of J.C.Bailey! That is a
completely different matter. Following men has been the cause of apostacy
down through the ages.

Man-Made Rules and Regulations
In the authoritarian discipleship movement rules and regulations are
enforced which admittedly are not found in the Scriptures. It is argued
that extra-Biblical rules and regulations are necessary to keep
inexperienced Christians from going astray.

Robert Nelson in his book ‘Understanding the Crossroads Controversy’
(1981, Robert Nelson, Gainesville, Florida) gives these man-made rules
the strange name of ‘Bible principle rules’ (page 84). In the appendix he
compares them to the rules and regulations of Christian colleges (Ap
I-1). In so doing he reveals the error of his thinking.

A Christian college is a human institution and as such may have human
regulations. No one is obligated to attend a certain school. If he
doesn’t like its regulations, he may chose a school with rules more to
his liking.

The church of Christ, however, is a divine institution and no one but God
may make rules for its members. The question is not whether certain rules
are good or bad, but whether men have the right to make rules for God’s
church.

One of the first doctrinal problems in the church was an attempt by
Jewish false teachers to bind things which God had not bound. The saints
at Colossae had allowed false teachers who used “philosophy and empty
deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic
principles of the world, and not according to Christ” (Col. 2:8) to
persuade them to follow man-made rules and regulations. Paul rebuked
them: “If you died with Christ from the basic principles of the world,
why, as though living in the world, do you subject yourselves to
regulations — ‘Do not touch, do not taste, do not handle,’ which all
concern things which perish with the using — according to the
commandments and doctrines of men? These things indeed have an appearance
of wisdom in self-imposed religion, false humility, and neglect of the
body, but are of no value against the indulgence of the flesh” (Col.
2:20-23).

Human rules and regulations may have an APPEARANCE OF WISDOM, but
actually they are worthless. They are not an expression of spirituality,
but of worldliness!

This form of worldliness has been a popular heresy in every age. The
world is run on the basis of human authority and outward regulations. It
HAS to be, because an outward rule is the only thing men can ENFORCE. But
the kingdom of God is different. It is not based on law enforcement.
The New Covenant is written on the heart.

I recently had the privilege of baptizing a man who left the Jehovah’s
Witnesses 12 years ago. He said he knew something was wrong with them
because he didn’t have the liberty Jesus promised those who know the
truth.

Christian leaders violate the liberty of Christ when they impose man-make
regulations on the flock, rather than teaching them to observe the things
which CHRIST has commanded.
A rule-maker always tries to justify his little regulations on the basis
of the principles they are SUPPOSED to advance.

Bible study and prayer are necessary for growth in Christ. Instead of
teaching and exhorting the brethren to study the Word and to pray without
ceasing, the rule-maker comes up with a neat little package called ‘quiet
time.’ Someone who has had his ‘quite time’ every day can feel really
religious. But shame on you if you missed a couple of days this week. The
sons of God are treated like children in a kindergarten who are told to
lay their heads on their desks for five minutes. Instead of encouraging
fellowship, the rule-maker comes up with “brother’s keepers.”
Neo-methodism is extremely influential in current religious thought, no
doubt as a reaction to indifference. When you beg people to do what is
right and they won’t listen, it is tempting to try to MAKE them do what
is right. This tendency is affecting the church adversely, not only in
the Crossroads/Boston apostasy, but also in the name of Mission Methods,
Church Growth Methods, Church Organization Methods and Devotional
Methods.

Methodism always goes hand in hand with authoritarianism. When you start
making rules, someone must ENFORCE them. Otherwise they don’t work. This
approach appeals to worldly people because it makes them feel so
righteous and it gets fast visible (though superficial) results. Also,
interestingly enough, it is especially appealing to young intellectuals.

John Wesley’s methodistic movement started as a devotional group at
Oxford. Their purpose in meeting was to deepen their spiritual life by
prayer and study of the Scriptures. They were first called ‘methodists’
by others because they were unusually precise and ‘methodic’ in their
religious observances. Sound familiar?

In the hierarchical organization Wesley set up, he was a real tyrant.
When one of their groups in Glasgow decided to be led by a “Session” (a
Presbyterian term referring to leadership by a group composed of the
elders and the preacher), Wesley wrote the following letter to his
evangelist in charge: “Cork, May 10, 1789. My Dear Brother, –‘Sessions’!
‘elders’! We Methodists have no such custom, neither any of the Churches
of God that are under our care. I require you, Jonathan Crowther,
immediately to dissolve that session (so called) at Glasgow. Discharge
them from meeting any more. And if they will leave the Society, let them
leave it. We acknowledge only preachers, stewards, and leaders among us,
over which the assistant in each circuit presides. You ought to have kept
to the Methodist plan from the beginning. Who had my authority to vary
from it? If the people of Glasgow, or any other place, are weary of us,
we will leave them to themselves. But we are willing to be still their
servants, for Christ’s sake, according to our own discipline, but no
other. John Wesley.” (This quotation is from a METHODIST book: “Church
Organisations” James H. Rigg, Third Edition, Publ. Charles H. Kelly,
London, 1897, page 261). Sound familiar? And the Methodists really grew!
Wow! What success!

One preacher, who is not in the Boston/Crossroads movement, said he had
become tired of pleading with people to do what they are obligated to do.
He suggested an authoritarian approach of just telling people what to do.

Especially in times of apathy, it is tempting to try to MAKE people do
what is right, but that is not God’s way. Jesus is not a door-crasher.
“Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears My voice and
opens the door, I will come in to him and dine with him, and he with Me”
(Rev. 3:20). To whom did Jesus say that? To Christians whom he had just
called to repentance: “As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten. Therefore
be zealous and repent” (Rev. 3:19).
Even though we do sometimes get tired, we must keep on pleading with
people, beseeching them to do what is right, exhorting them. But let us
never rob them of their responsibility by coercing them.

Jeremiah said to Zedekiah: “Please, obey the voice of the LORD which I
speak to you. So it shall be well with you, and your soul shall live”
(Jer. 38:20).

A beautiful word which is used many times in the N.T. is PARAKALEO which
can mean variously: exhort, beseech, plead, beg, encourage, comfort.
Examine the following passages in which it is used: Luke 3:18; Acts 2:40;
11:23; 14:22; 15:32; Rom. 12:1,8; 15:30; 16:17; 1 Cor. 1:10; 4:13,16;
14:31; 16:15; 2 Cor. 2:8; 5:20; 6:1; 10:1; Eph. 4:1; Phil. 4:2; 1 Thes.
2:11,12; 4:1,10; 5:14; 2 Thes. 3:12; 1 Tim. 2:1; 5:1; 6:2; 2 Tim. 4:2;
Titus 1:9; 2:6,15; Philemon 9,10; Heb. 3:13; 10:25; 13:19,22; 1 Peter
2:11; 5:1,12; Jude 3. See also Gal. 4:12 and 2 John 5 where similar words
are used (beg and request).

We should not try to force man-made rites and regulations on others, nor
should we allow others to bind them on us.

Submission
In the hierarchical discipleship movement much emphasis is placed on
submission and loyalty to the ‘discipler’ who is above one.

We are indeed told to submit to our leaders (1 Cor. 16:16; Heb. 13:17; 1
Peter 5:5). Wives are also to submit to their husbands. But this may not
be twisted into: Elders, boss the flock! Husbands, boss your wives! I
don’t know about your wife, but mine — although she does a fairly good
job of being submissive — will not be bossed! Sometimes you can make
people do things, but that is not submission.

An example of the authoritarian approach was given by the preacher
mentioned above. He was pleased that one of their elders had announced on
Sunday morning: “You are expected to be here tonight and you are expected
to have your sheets filled in.”

Before I explain what is wrong with this, let me give a good example in
comparison. I recently saw the following in a bulletin: “Tonight our
brother will be bringing a lesson to us at the 6.30 hour. Your shepherds
want to provide ‘food for thought’ for the spiritual strength you will
need for the coming week, so don’t neglect the opportunity for your
nourishment.”

Isn’t that beautiful? A command is given. One may give a command IF IT IS
BACKED BY THE WORD OF GOD, and this one is (Heb. 10:25). Contrary to what
some believe, it is not necessarily wrong to be absent from a second
meeting on the Lord’s day … unless it is because of NEGLECT, unless one
is “forsaking the assembling of ourselves together.”

To say to a whole congregation: “You are expected to be here this
evening” is wrong because there may be people present whom God DOES NOT
EXPECT to be there. It is presumptuous for elders to expect something God
does not expect. The Lord may have a task for some that evening which is
more important than being at the meeting. Would that be “forsaking the
assembly”? Remember the widow’s mite? There may be some who because of
age or infirmity show much more dedication to God by coming ONCE each
week, than someone else who is in good health shows by being there every
time the door is open. Would they necessarily be “forsaking the assembly”
if they stayed home? What about a couple who must travel a great distance
to attend services? Would they be “forsaking the assembly” if they
studied the Scriptures and praised God in their own home on Sunday night?
There are many, many things about our service to God which can only be
decided by ourselves, and we shall each have to be responsible for our
decisions on the last day.

This elder was being presumptuous, self-willed and unjust. He was trying
to lord it over the flock. If that is his customary behaviour, he is not
qualified to be an elder (Titus 1:7,8).

The second part of his command was: “And you are expected to have your
sheets filled in.” That is about as childish as one can get. A
commandment of man is being forced upon the people of God.

It seems to be one of the current fads in the U.S. to have question
sheets to fill in. We were given lots of sheets to fill in on our last
trip to America. Most were of such a nature that I am SURE God didn’t
mind at all when we didn’t fill them in! They were often passed out at
what was called a ‘Bible study.’ Usually, one could get along quite well
without a Bible. Once when my parents complained that there had not been
a single verse from the Bible read during a ‘Bible study,’ they heard the
reply: “Oh, but you were five minutes late. You missed the Bible verse!”

But let’s assume that some question sheets have been prepared which are
excellent means of increasing ones knowledge of Christ and His word. Do
the elders have a right to ‘expect’ that everyone fill them in? To offer
them as a help, even to encourage brethren to use them, would be fine,
but to ‘expect’ that everyone fill them in is binding something which God
has not bound.
When someone does not speak according to the word of God it is because
there is no light in him. Man-made rules and regulations are an
expression of worldliness.

Cross-Examination and Coercion
Cross-examination is used as a means of ‘training’ Christians in the
authoritarian discipleship movement. Members are encouraged to have
so-called ‘spiritual’ discussions after services asking each other
questions such as: “Did you read your Bible and have quiet time every day
this week? Did you invite someone to Bible study every day?”

Once a week, in a private prayer session with some more ‘mature’
disciple, the cross-examination is extended to the area of specific sins:
“Did you commit sin A, B, C or D this week?”

Is this according to Scripture? Paul wrote: “Examine yourselves as to
whether you are in the faith. Prove yourselves. Do you not know
yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you? — unless indeed you are
disqualified” (2 Cor. 13:5).

A slip of paper was given to me many years ago by a former Jehovah’s
Witness I baptized. It is the sheet all Jehovah’s Witnesses must hand in
each week showing how much literature they sold, how many Bible studies
they conducted, and the number of hours they ‘witnessed.’ A sister who
was formerly a J.W. told me she wrote across her sheet once: “Did Paul
have to do this?”

The Jehovah’s Witnesses deny they coerce their members, claiming the
report is only for planning. It is obvious, however, that it places them
under compulsion to work an ‘acceptable’ number of hours. Instead of
‘examining themselves’ they are being coerced by their leaders.

The use of compulsion to get Christians to do even something good is
contrary to the doctrine of Christ. Christians are to be taught and
admonished to do what is right, but they are never to be coerced.

No compulsion is to be used, for example, with regard to giving: “So let
each one give as he purposes in his heart, not grudgingly or of
necessity; for God loves a cheerful giver” (2 Cor. 9:7).
At a Catholic mass I once attended the priest walked up and down every
row looking each person straight in the eye as he passed the collection
basket! Most, of course, felt compelled to contribute. I smiled and said:
“No thank you.”

I have also heard of elders in the church who violated this principle.
They visited Christians in their homes and intimidated them by asking how
much they were giving. They claimed they had a right to know. In some
cases they even told people how much to give! Paul said ‘Examine
yourselves’ not ‘Cross-examine each other.’ He told the Corinthians:
“With me it is a very small thing that I should be judged by you or by a
human court. … He who judges me is the Lord” (1 Cor. 4:3,4). The Greek
word for ‘judge’ in this verse means to ‘examine’ as in a court of law.
Paul used the same word two chapters earlier when he wrote: “He who is
spiritual judges all things, yet he himself is [rightly] judged by no
one” (1 Cor. 2:15).

The principle of self-examination also applies to the Lord’s supper: “Let
a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread and drink of that
cup” (1 Cor. 11:28).

Paul wrote to Philemon about Onesimus, his run-away slave, whom Paul had
taught the gospel: “whom I wished to keep with me, that on your behalf he
might minister to me in my chains for the gospel. But without your
consent I wanted to do nothing, that your good deed might not be by
compulsion, as it were, but voluntary” (Philemon 13,14).

Christians are to serve voluntarily. Compulsion robs them of the
opportunity. The elders of one congregation which had been influenced by
the Boston/Crossroads movement told a couple who lived more than a hour’s
drive away from the meeting place that they would be disfellowshipped if
they didn’t attend certain mid-week meetings regularly.

We are told to confess our sins to one another and to pray for one
another (James 5:16). We are not told to cross-examine one another! A
cross-examination, whether by a priest in a confessional, or by some
presumptuous ‘more mature’ disciple, is a slap in the face of Christ.
“Who are you to judge another’s servant? To his own master he stands or
falls. Indeed, he will be made to stand, for God is able to make him
stand” (Rom. 14:4).

Does this mean that we may never reprimand a brother for sin? Certainly
not. There is a great difference, however, between helping a brother who
has sinned, and cross-examining a brother!
Moreover, not all Christians are qualified: “Brethren, if a man is
overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual restore such a one in a
spirit of gentleness, considering yourself lest you also be tempted. Bear
one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ. For if anyone
thinks himself to be something, when he is nothing, he deceives himself.
But let each one examine his own work, and then he will have rejoicing in
himself alone, and not in another. For each one shall bear his own load”
(Gal. 6:1-5).

Coercion is common in politics and business. False religions also use
compulsion effectively to manipulate their members.

Followers of Christ, however, do not coerce one another. They obey
Christ: “You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and
those who are great exercise authority over them. Yet it shall not be so
among you” (Matt. 20:25,26).

“Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty” (2 Cor. 3:17). We may
not misuse our liberty as a cloak for evil (Gal. 5:13; 1 Peter 2:16). But
neither may we submit to someone who would bring us into bondage: “But
this occurred because of false brethren secretly brought in (who came in
by stealth to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that
they might bring us into bondage), to whom we did not yield submission
even for an hour, that the truth of the gospel might continue with you”
(Gal. 2:4,5). “You were bought at a price; do not become slaves of men”
(1 Cor. 7:23).

How Serious Are These Errors?
Extremely so! When brethren usurp the authority of Christ and advocate
unscriptural church government it is not just a ‘matter of opinion’ or a
‘method of evangelism.’

Heartrending divisions have already occurred in many places where false
teachers have infiltrated congregations and built up a following. When
called to order by the elders they refused to repent, took ‘their
disciples’ and left. In other cases they gained control of the
congregation and those who did not agree with them had to leave.

Smooth-talking men of influence are doing all they can to champion these
ideas. In private discussions and in long letters brethren have lovingly
shown them from the Scriptures the errors they are making, but most of
them refuse to listen and repent. They are leading many astray.

HOW SHOULD WE TREAT PEOPLE IN THIS MOVEMENT?
What should our attitude be toward people from churches practising
hierarchical discipleship? There is no reason to doubt that these
congregations include people who believe in Christ and have been baptized
into His body. If such persons wish to worship with us and are willing to
respect Biblical leadership they should be received in love. As the need
arises, the way of God can be explained to them more accurately (Acts
18:26).

Beware of the Wolves
False teachers, however, must be rejected: “I urge you, brethren, note
those who cause divisions and offenses, contrary to the doctrine which
you learned, and avoid them” (Rom. 16:17). Advocates of pyramid
discipleship HAVE caused division through the introduction of a
hierarchical form of church government which conflicts with Biblical
principles of leadership.
How we treat them is not an optional matter. God has COMMANDED us to note
false teachers and to avoid them! “For those who are such do not serve
our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly, and by smooth words and
flattering speech deceive the hearts of the simple” (Rom. 16:18).
Paul warned that certain brethren would draw away disciples after
themselves. May we never be among them. “For I know this, that after my
departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock.
Also from among yourselves men will rise up, speaking perverse things, to
draw away the disciples after themselves. Therefore watch” (Acts
20:29-31).

False Pleas for Unity
Keep in mind that wolves are always in favour of unity between wolves and
sheep. But what they have in mind is not conducive to the well-being of
the sheep!

We all need to pray for peace and unity among God’s people. At the same
time we must remember that there can be no unity between truth and
falsehood. Among Christians there are always some who do not love the
truth. They do not study the word, or they study the word but do not
accept what it says. Such people are extremely susceptible to being
misled by false teachers. That is why divisions have always taken place
down through the ages and always will. Actually, they purify the church
(1 Cor. 11:18,19).

Those who added musical instruments to the worship a century ago
emphasized unity. They wanted to be accepted, unscriptural practices and
all. Understandably, for that would allow them to spread their false
teachings further. They emphasized unity and divided the church.

Advocates of the ‘Missionary Society’ also emphasized unity as they
divided the church over their sectarian ‘method of evangelism.’ Actually,
the Society was a flop. But that did not deter its champions. What if it
had been a ‘success’? Would it have been less unscriptural? It would have
been more dangerous, especially in a country like America where ‘success’
is a national god.
Those who now worship with instruments still want us to ACCEPT them. They
claim they want unity. But THEY CAUSE DIVISION. As they caused division a
century ago, so they cause division now by their agitations. Their plea
for unity is hypocritical. Their desire for unity is not great, or they
would be willing to put aside unscriptural worship for the sake of unity.
They are more dedicated to mechanical music than to unity on the basis of
God’s Word. Their goal is unity on their own terms, not unity in Christ.

Division has ALREADY COME as a result of the authoritarian discipleship
movement. Many people have already accepted these false teachings and
practices, who show no signs of repenting.
Those who follow Christ, refuse to follow men, and a parting of the ways
is inevitable between those who walk straight ahead on the narrow road
and those who turn aside. Division is always sad, but it is better than
apostasy.

The Corinthians
The argument has been made by some who are in favour of amoebic unity
that the Boston/Crossroads type churches are “every bit as faithful to
the word of God as the Corinthians.”

The Corinthians had serious problems, but they also had an excellent
characteristic: when Paul wrote to them they REPENTED (2 Cor. 7:7-15)!

Those who reject Christ’s authority by advocating teacher/disciple
relationships among Christians (contrary to Matt. 23:8-10) and by setting
up a hierarchy with men over tens, fifties, hundreds and thousands
(contrary to Mark 10:42,43) have been warned clearly and repeatedly about
the errors of their ways, but they REFUSE to repent.

What would Paul have done if the Corinthians had refused to repent? He
said that anyone who rejected what he wrote was to be rejected (1 Cor.
14:38)! He also said he was ready to punish every disobedience (2 Cor.
10:6).

And what did Paul say about those who had led the Corinthians astray?
“For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising
themselves as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for even Satan disguises
himself as an angel of light. So it is not strange if his servants also
disguise themselves as servants of righteousness. Their end will
correspond to their deeds” (2 Cor. 11:13-15).

Do not dishonour the Corinthians by comparing them with advocates of
authoritarian discipleship. The Corinthians repented of their many sins.
The ‘disciplers’ have not repented and most of them probably never will.
As one of their evangelists said: “It’s going to be something you’ll have
to deal with for a long time, probably from now on.”

Avoid Them
No, we may not unite with people who cause dissensions in the body of
Christ. If Romans 16:17,18 ever applied to anyone, it applies to leaders
in the ‘get discipled by men’ movement: “Now I urge you, brethren, note
those who cause divisions and offenses, contrary to the doctrine which
you learned, and avoid them. For those who are such do not serve our Lord
Jesus Christ, but their own belly, and by smooth words and flattering
speech deceive the hearts of the simple.”

Love
Be sure to maintain the spirit of Christ in your dealings with those who
are misled or confused. Resistance to error can do more harm than good if
it is not Christlike.

Love must be our motive in opposing the doctrines of these men. We love
them and hope they will repent. We also love the souls they are deceiving
and the church they are dividing.

A Blessing or a Curse? 
For those who know and love the Word of God, this ‘discipleship’ movement
will be a blessing. When the subject is discussed they will test all
things and retain that which is good. They will be forced to restudy
discipleship and this will deepen their commitment as followers of
Christ.

People who become Christians through this movement, if they love the
truth, will continue to grow in knowledge. Eventually they will cast off
human domination and will find their way to congregations which submit to
the authority of Christ, as has already occurred in many cases.
Certain people, however, are in danger of being deceived and led astray;
for example, those for whom numerical ‘success’ is more important than
truth, those who are intrigued by human theories and doctrines, those who
prefer being told what to do rather than accepting their own
responsibility, and those who like to exercise authority over others.

Statistics can be Deceiving 
Fidelity to New Testament principles and practice is the ONLY valid
measure of success. Numerical ‘success’ on an unscriptural foundation is
not true success. An impressive house can be built on sand, but only the
house on the Rock will stand. A child can count the seeds in an apple,
but only God knows how many apples are in a seed.

Watch Out! 
Total commitment is Biblical, regimentation is not. New Testament
teaching on discipleship and personal commitment to Christ certainly
needs to be stressed. But after someone presents a stirring plea for you
to follow Christ, be careful that he doesn’t trick you into following HIM
instead.

Let us follow the old paths and not be led astray by human precepts and
practices even if they do have “an appearance of wisdom” (Col. 2:23).
Only if we continue in the word of Christ are we truly His disciples
(John 8:31).

 

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 27, 2014 in Article, Church

 

The Anatomy of a Backslider: Learning From One Who Knows By Experience


In 2 Peter 2:20-22 we read of the real possibility and serious
consequences of backsliding:
“If they have escaped the corruption of the world by knowing our Lord and
Savior Jesus Christ and are again entangled in it and overcome, they are
worse off at the end than they were at the beginning. {21} It would have
been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than to
have known it and then to turn their backs on the sacred command that was
passed on to them. {22} Of them the proverbs are true: “A dog returns to
its vomit,” and, “A sow that is washed goes back to her wallowing in the
mud.””

It is interesting that we find this passage coming from the inspired pen
of Peter…for if anyone knew “firsthand” the reality and dangers of
backsliding, it was Peter! He discovered these truths the night he denied
Jesus!

The process of backsliding is a gradual one, often overtaking a person by
surprise; and lest we fall from our own steadfastness…we shall
carefully examine the process that led to Peter’s denial of Christ.
Notice how Peter’s own words in his epistles are designed to prevent the
same from happening to us!

THE ANATOMY OF A BACKSLIDER
A. PRIDE – Mark 14:27-31: “You will all fall away,” Jesus told them, “for
it is written: “‘I will strike the shepherd, and the sheep will be
scattered.’ {28} But after I have risen, I will go ahead of you into
Galilee.” {29} Peter declared, “Even if all fall away, I will not.” {30}
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “today–yes, tonight–before the
rooster crows twice you yourself will disown me three times.” {31} But
Peter insisted emphatically, “Even if I have to die with you, I will
never disown you.” And all the others said the same.”

1. In a boastful manner, Peter claims he will not fall away or deny
Christ!
2. In doing so, Peter takes the first step in backsliding: “pride”!
– cf. _Pr 16:18
3. Why is this the “first” step?
a. Because the first step in entering the kingdom is humility –
Mt 18:3-4
b. So if we lose “humility”, we take that first step backward
4. Paul’s advice to the Corinthians is very apropos in this regard
– cf. _1 Co 10:11

B. LAZINESS – Mark 14:32-42: “They went to a place called Gethsemane, and
Jesus said to his disciples, “Sit here while I pray.” {33} He took Peter,
James and John along with him, and he began to be deeply distressed and
troubled. {34} “My soul is overwhelmed with sorrow to the point of
death,” he said to them. “Stay here and keep watch.” {35} Going a little
farther, he fell to the ground and prayed that if possible the hour might
pass from him. {36} “Abba, Father,” he said, “everything is possible for
you. Take this cup from me. Yet not what I will, but what you will.” {37}
Then he returned to his disciples and found them sleeping. “Simon,” he
said to Peter, “are you asleep? Could you not keep watch for one hour?
{38} Watch and pray so that you will not fall into temptation. The spirit
is willing, but the body is weak.” {39} Once more he went away and prayed
the same thing. {40} When he came back, he again found them sleeping,
because their eyes were heavy. They did not know what to say to him. {41}
Returning the third time, he said to them, “Are you still sleeping and
resting? Enough! The hour has come. Look, the Son of Man is betrayed into
the hands of sinners. {42} Rise! Let us go! Here comes my betrayer!””

1. Told to keep watch, Peter kept falling asleep
2. It was therefore lack of diligent preparation which caused him
to be caught off guard for what was to follow
3. The same thing can happen to us!
a. Without diligence, we too can be found unprepared – Lk
21:34-36
b. More often than not, it is a “gradual drifting” that catches
us off guard – Heb. 2:1-3
c. But when we are proud of ourselves, we become lazy, and
that easily leads to the next step…

C. COWARDICE – Mark 14:54: “Peter followed him at a distance, right into
the courtyard of the high priest. There he sat with the guards and warmed
himself at the fire.”

1. Note that it says “…Peter followed Him at a distance”
2. Now that Jesus had become unpopular…
a. Peter stays far enough away so as not to be identified with
Him
b. Peter was unprepared for the challenge of facing ridicule and
persecution
3. Without diligent preparation, we too can become guilty of
cowardice!
a. Ashamed to be seen carrying a Bible
b. Ashamed to be seen giving thanks
c. Ashamed to be seen with other Christians
d. Perhaps even ashamed to let others know that we are
Christians!
4. And yet, Jesus has made it clear what He thinks of “cowardice”
Mark 8:38; Rev. 21:8
5. When we are ashamed of Christ, it is natural for to fall into
the next step of backsliding…

D. WORLDLINESS – Mark 14:54: “Peter followed him at a distance, right
into the courtyard of the high priest. There he sat with the guards and
warmed himself at the fire.”

1. We now find Peter sitting with the servants of the High Priest
and warming himself by the fire
2. Ashamed to be seen with Christ, it becomes easy to mingle with
those of the world and enjoy their comforts
3. But one cannot be “comforted by the fire” of the world, and not
be “burned”!
a. Close contact with that which can harm has its effects! –
Prov. 6:27-29
b. So it is we cannot “flirt with the world” and walk away
untouched! – 1 Cor. 15:33
4. By the time we become “friends with the world”, it is only a
short time before we take the next and final step of backsliding…

E. DENIAL – Mark 14:66-71: “While Peter was below in the courtyard, one
of the servant girls of the high priest came by. {67} When she saw Peter
warming himself, she looked closely at him. “You also were with that
Nazarene, Jesus,” she said. {68} But he denied it. “I don’t know or
understand what you’re talking about,” he said, and went out into the
entryway. {69} When the servant girl saw him there, she said again to
those standing around, “This fellow is one of them.” {70} Again he denied
it. After a little while, those standing near said to Peter, “Surely you
are one of them, for you are a Galilean.” {71} He began to call down
curses on himself, and he swore to them, “I don’t know this man you’re
talking about.””

1. Away from Christ, at comfort with those in the world, Peter
finds himself denying His Lord and Savior!
2. In so doing, he has put himself in grave danger – Matt. 10:32-33
3. Though we may never actually deny Jesus in “words”, we can
easily backslide to the point of denying Him in “action”…
a. We are called to worship Him…but make excuses why we cannot
b. We are called to serve Him…but render little or no service
c. We are called to stand by His side and suffer for His
name…but stand afar off in the safety of the world’s comfort

[When we deny the Lord, our backsliding is complete; unless we repent,
the only thing left is to one day face the Lord, where we will fully
realize the error of our ways!

For Peter, he fully realized his sin when the Lord turned and looked at
him there in the courtyard:
Luke 22:60-62: “Peter replied, “Man, I don’t know what you’re talking
about!” Just as he was speaking, the rooster crowed. {61} The Lord turned
and looked straight at Peter. Then Peter remembered the word the Lord had
spoken to him: “Before the rooster crows today, you will disown me three
times.” {62} And he went outside and wept bitterly.”

Imagine the feeling in Peter’s heart as those eyes of His Savior pierced
his soul! Like
Judas, Peter wept bitterly over his sin.

Unlike Judas, Peter had “godly sorrow” that results in true repentance (2
Cor. 7:10-11). And years later, we find Peter writing the sort of things
that would prevent us from making the same mistake he did…]

ADVICE FROM ONE WHO LEARNED THE HARD WAY
A. TO GUARD AGAINST “PRIDE”…
1. Peter enjoins “humility” – 1 Peter 5:5-6
2. Indeed, “God resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble”

B. TO WARD AGAINST “LAZINESS”…
1. Peter commands “diligence” – 1 Peter 5:8-9
2. Note especially his words in his second epistle – 2 Peter
1:5,10; 3:14

C. INSTEAD OF “COWARDICE”…
1. Peter charges us to “glorify God” – 1 Peter 4:16
2. Think not of what it means to you, but what it means to God!

D. INSTEAD OF “WORLDLINESS”…
1. Peter tells us to “abstain” – 1 Peter 2:11-12
2. Remember that we are “sojourners and pilgrims”, destined for a
better place than the things of this world have to offer!

E. INSTEAD OF “DENIAL”…
1. Peter exhorts us to ever be ready to “give a defense” – 1 Peter
3:15
2. By careful preparation, we will “defend” Christ, and not “deny”
Christ!

CONCLUSION
1. From one who learned by the hard road of experience, let’s heed his
advice lest we one day backslide ourselves, and in so doing deny the
Lord! – 2 Peter 3:17-18

2. Remember too that when Peter saw the eyes of his Lord, he realized the
error of his way…
a. Fortunately for him, there was still time to repent
b. But for us, when we see Jesus “face to face”, the time to repent
will be gone…it will be the time for judgment!

3. If we realize that we are guilty of backsliding…
a. Repent now, do not wait until you stand before Jesus
b. Do it now, so that your “face to face” encounter with Jesus will be
terrific, not terrifying!

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 25, 2014 in Article

 

God Loves To Give Gifts


Long before we took our first breath, our Creator showed Himself to be a great giver of everything a man or woman could ask for. Today, He still wants to give us the desires of our heart (Psalm 37:4). As the Father of heaven, He is behind “every good gift and every perfect gift” (James 1:17). When we say that “the best things in life are free,” it’s a way of acknowledging that when God gives life, and friendship, and laughter, He is showing that no one can give a better gift than He can. Yet His best offer is so priceless and so perfectly suited to our needs and happiness, many think it’s too good to be true.


It’s Described In The Bible

The most quoted of all books describes a wonderfully mysterious gift that goes far beyond anything we have ever received. When unwrapped, it includes peace of mind, acceptance, forgiveness, adoption into the family of heaven, and everlasting life. But does God offer to give us the desires of our heart as a reward for good living? Not according to the Bible. It refers to this spiritual package as salvation and calls it “the gift of God” (Romans 6:23; Ephesians 2:8-9).

It Cannot Be Earned

In most areas of life we work hard to earn respect and the right to be trusted and promoted. But God’s perfect gift of salvation is different. It comes not by merit but by mercy, not by trying but by trusting, and not by working but by resting. In the words of the apostle Paul, “By grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works lest anyone should boast” (Ephesians 2:8-9). In another of his New Testament letters, Paul added, “Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us” (Titus 3:5).

God Paid For It Himself

Long before wise men brought gifts to a Bethlehem manger, our Creator gave us the gift of choice. Knowing that love must be voluntary to be meaningful, He gave us the freedom to accept or reject Him. From the beginning, however, our first parents chose to walk away from Him. Instead of leaving them in their rebellion, He revealed a plan of rescue whereby an innocent victim would die on behalf of the guilty. An elaborate system of symbolic Temple ritual anticipated what God Himself would do for us on the center page of human history. At the time of God’s own choosing and in a moment of infinite and eternal significance, He did what can only be explained by love—He sacrificed His Son to pay for our sin (John 1:29; Hebrews 10:5-10).

It Comes With A Proof Of Purchase

The receipt we hold for His payment is the record of history. Jewish prophets predicted a Messiah who would deliver His people from their sin (Isaiah 53; Daniel 9:26). When He arrived, the Gospel writers tell us that He healed the sick, raised the dead, and gave hope to the oppressed. Then He did what no one expected Him to do. Instead of riding to power on the shoulders of adoring crowds, He silently bore the slander of critics, and voluntarily died at the hands of Roman executioners. Three days later, He walked out of a guarded tomb (Luke 24:1-7). Eyewitnesses of the resurrected Christ died at the hands of enemies rather than deny that they had seen Him alive.

It Was Wrapped With Care

God packaged His perfect gift in thousands of years of fulfilled predictions, widely observed miracles, and breathtaking rescues. Then after centuries of anticipation, the Lord of heaven visited a young Jewish woman named Mary and, in the greatest of all miracles, wrapped Himself in her womb. In the years that followed, He surrounded the gift in the irony of obscurity, the affection of unlikely followers, the envy of religious leaders, and the crushing disappointment of death. When all seemed lost, God wrapped His gift in the excited reports of witnesses who announced an unexpected resurrection from the dead. For a final touch, the Creator gave His gift of salvation a colorful bow of diversity—people from every nation on earth whose hearts and lives have been changed by His love (Revelation 5:9).

God Offers It By Grace

To those who had already accepted the offer of God’s mercy, the apostle Paul wrote, “By grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works lest anyone should boast” (Ephesians 2:8-9). Paul had once tried to earn his own way into God’s favor (Philippians 3:3-9). Now he wanted his readers to know what he himself had discovered—that it is only by the grace of God that the angels of heaven welcome fallen and broken rebels into the eternal family and presence of God. In another letter, Paul described the difference between Adam, who spread sin and death to all his descendants, and Christ, who brought grace and life to all who trust Him. So he wrote, “But the free gift is not like the offense. For if by the one man’s offense [Adam’s sin] many died, much more the grace of God and the gift by the grace of the one Man, Jesus Christ, abounded to many” (Romans 5:15).

It Can Be Received Only Through Faith and Baptism (by immersion) for remission of sins (Acts 2:38)

Paul’s carefully chosen words to the Ephesians were, “By grace you have been saved through faith.” In this qualifying phrase, we are reminded that God comes only where He is invited. The One who wants us to share the happiness of His eternal family knocks gently at the door of our hearts, waiting for us to welcome Him into our lives (John 1:12). So the gospel says, “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life” (John 3:16). The first Christians responded in Acts 2:38 with repentance and baptism for remission of sins, to receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

It’s Available To Anyone Willing To Receive It

Most of Jesus’ best friends were fishermen, not scholars. One was a tax collector. One had been possessed by demons. One sold her body for a living. What they had in common was their willingness to accept the gift of God. Together they were the kind of men and women Jesus loved to bring to His Father. Even in His dying hour, while hanging on a cross between two dying criminals, Jesus gave the gift of eternal life. One of the two mocked Him, saying, “If You are the Christ, save Yourself and us.” The other criminal rebuked the first and said, “Do you not even fear God, seeing you are under the same condemnation? And we indeed justly, for we receive the due reward of our deeds; but this Man has done nothing wrong.” Then he said to Jesus, “Lord, remember me when You come into Your kingdom.” Only because salvation is a gift of grace could Jesus say to him, “Today you will be with Me in Paradise” (Luke 23:39-43).

It Inspires Gratitude

Those who avoid asking for help often take pride in being obligated to no one. But those who are willing to admit their spiritual need discover something more meaningful than self-sufficiency. They join those grateful people who know they owe their lives to someone else. Those who have been saved from a burning car or building by a courageous firefighter or bystander know what it means to live the rest of their lives with a deep sense of gratitude. In a similar way, those who know they have been rescued by God’s grace from the fires of judgment have reason to live the rest of their lives out of the overflow of their gratefulness to God (Ephesians 2:10). Nothing puts a smile on a face or love in a heart like the overwhelming awareness that all we could ever ask for has been given to us in the perfect gift of God

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 20, 2014 in Article

 

10 Reasons to Believe that God Became a Man


If you still have doubts that Jesus is the Son of God, you can lay them to rest with this convincing list.

 A virgin conceived.
If Mary was telling the truth, her baby had no human father. She claimed an angel appeared to her and told her she would conceive a son by God’s Spirit and said that this child, whom she was to name Jesus, would be the Son of God (Luke 2:26-35). If Mary was lying, the night of Jesus’ birth was not holy, and the only

thing that was silent was the truth. But how can we know? How can we take seriously the kind of story that usually deserves laughs of disbelief? The answer is in what followed. If there were no witnesses and no evidence, we could ignore Mary’s claims. If her son’s life were the same as any other life, her claim of a virgin birth would be the easiest of all stories to dismiss.

An Old Testament prophet predicted a God-man.
What we do know is that in the seventh century B.C., the prophet Isaiah made predictions about a servant of the Lord who would rule the earth in the last days. He described a day in which all of the earth would be at peace and all the nations would go up to Jerusalem to worship God (Isaiah 2). Isaiah announced: “Unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given; and the government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace” (9:6, NKJV). Isaiah also gave a mysterious prophecy that was only partially fulfilled in his lifetime. It began, “The Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a Son, and shall call His name Immanuel” (7:14). Immanuel means “God with us.”


Angels announced the birth.
In the shepherds’ fields outside of Bethlehem, a group of witnesses formed a bridge between Isaiah and Mary. According to New Testament records (Luke 2:8-14), terrified Jewish shepherds were visited by an angel who announced the birth of Israel’s long-awaited Messiah. The angel said: “Do not be afraid, for behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy which will be to all people. For there is born to you this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord. And this will be the sign to you: You will find a Babe wrapped in swaddling cloths, lying in a manger” (v. 10-12). As the shepherds told it, a multitude of angels appeared, praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, goodwill toward men” (v. 14).


A sign appeared in the sky.
According to the New Testament, a light in the sky gave additional credibility to Mary. A group of Magi from the East followed a star-like sign to the Jewish town of Bethlehem. What they found was a child they believed to be the long-awaited Jewish Messiah. For hundreds of years Old Testament prophets had been speaking of “a Star” and “a Scepter” that would come out of Israel (Numbers 24:17). The Old Testament also predicted a ruler of Israel who would come out of Bethlehem, a ruler “whose goings forth are from of old, from everlasting” (Micah 5:2).

The time was right.
Many believe that the Magi who worshiped Jesus after His birth came from the region of Babylon. If so, they could have had access to the prophecy of a Jewish prophet named Daniel. While in exile in Babylon 400 years earlier, Daniel had a vision that allows for the calculation of the arrival of the Jewish Messiah. According to Daniel’s vision, from the command to rebuild the temple (458 B.C. or 444 B.C.), 69 “sevens” would be followed by the arrival and death of Messiah (Daniel 7:13-14; 9:24-27). Some believe this prophecy predicted the exact number of days until Jesus’ triumphal entry into Jerusalem.


Jesus claimed to be equal with God.
Some have suggested that Jesus never claimed for Himself what His followers claimed for Him. Yet the commotion that surrounded His life can be best explained by His repeated claim to be one with God. John, one of the Gospel writers, quoted Jesus as saying, “Before Abraham was, I AM” (8:58). (In Exodus 3:14, the name I AM was used by God to identify Himself to Moses.) John also quoted Jesus as saying, “I and My Father are One” (10:30) and “If you had known Me, you would have known My Father also; and from now on you know Him and have seen Him” (14:7). According to the Gospels, Jesus said that to love or hate Him, or to receive or reject Him, was to love or hate and receive or reject His Father in heaven.


His friends worshiped Him.
When Thomas, one of Jesus’ disciples, saw the resurrected Christ, he declared, “My Lord and my God!” (John 20:28). Years later, Jesus’ close friend and follower John wrote, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made … And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth” (John 1:1-3,14). Another friend, Peter, in one of his letters to the early church, addressed his readers as“those who have obtained like precious faith with us by the righteousness of our God and Savior Jesus Christ” (2 Peter 1:1).

Jesus’ enemies accused him of blasphemy.
Jesus’ friends may have wanted to believe He was more than a man, but His enemies did not. The religious leaders of Israel were outraged to think that the same man who accused them of being hypocritical, blind leaders of the blind, would also claim to forgive sins, would speak of God as His Father and would even say that He was one with God. On more than one occasion the leaders of Israel picked up stones to kill Jesus, saying, “For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy, and because You being a Man, make Yourself God” (John 10:33).


Jesus’ miracles supported His claims.
Jesus’ miracles recorded in the New Testament were more than wonders. They were signs. He did them to encourage men and women to believe in Him for everlasting life. He healed a crippled man to affirm His right to forgive sins. He fed thousands of people with a little boy’s lunch, setting the stage for His claim to be the “bread of life.” He walked on water, stilled angry seas, healed the sick, restored paralyzed limbs, gave sight to the blind and hearing to the deaf, and even raised from the dead an embalmed man by the name of Lazarus. One reason Jesus performed miracles was to support His claim to be God. The apostle John wrote, “Truly Jesus did many other signs in the presence of His disciples, which are not written in this book, but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name” (John 20:30-31).

His departure was greater than His arrival.
Many people down through history have claimed to be gods. Yet only one man has been willing to die for the sins of others. Only one has risen from the dead to prove that He is the Son of God. According to the New Testament, after Jesus voluntarily gave His life on an executioner’s cross, He appeared to His closest disciples and more than 500 other followers for a period of 40 days (1 Corinthians 15:5-8). The eyewitnesses were so convinced of His resurrection that they were willing to suffer and die for their claims. His disciples said that He showed them His scarred hands and feet, walked and talked with them, and even ate with them. Then while they met with Him on the Mount of Olives, He gave them His last words and ascended into the clouds. With a departure more spectacular than His arrival, Jesus left us with a better understanding of the announcement of the angel who said, “There is born to you this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord” (Luke 2:11).

You’re not alone if you have mixed feelings when you think about the evidence surrounding the life of Jesus. You may feel compelled to believe that Jesus is the Son of God, but you’re not sure of your relationship to Him. If that’s the case, be assured of this: If you accept Him, He will accept you. If you will receive His offer of forgiveness, everlasting life and adoption into the family of God, He will become your Savior, teacher and Lord.

If you’ve never received Jesus in this way, we encourage you to carefully read the New Testament verses of Romans 3:23 (which says that all have sinned), Romans 6:23 (which says that the wages of sin is spiritual death, separation from God) and Romans 10:13 (which assures us that all who call on the name of the Lord Jesus will be saved). Study Acts 2:38 and look at baptism from the book of Acts to see its need in your life as a part of salvation.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 12, 2014 in Article

 

10 Reasons to Believe in the Existence of God


You don’t have to believe in God. But here are 10 compelling reasons for the existence of God. The choice to believe is up to you.

 The Inevitability of Faith.
Everyone believes in something. No one can endure the stress and cares of life without faith in something that cannot ultimately be proven. Atheists cannot prove there is no God. Pantheists cannot prove that everything is God. Pragmatists cannot prove that what will count for them in the future is what works for them now. Nor can agnostics prove that it is impossible to know one way or the other. Faith is unavoidable, even if we choose to believe only in ourselves. What is to be decided is what evidence we think is pertinent, how we are going to interpret that evidence, and who or what we are willing to believe in (Luke 16:16).

 The Limitations of Science.
Scientific method is limited to a process defined by that which is measurable and repeatable. By definition, it cannot speak to issues of ultimate origin, meaning or morality. For such answers, science is dependent on the values and personal beliefs of those who use it. Science, therefore, has great potential for both good and evil. It can be used to make vaccines or poisons, nuclear power plants or nuclear weapons. It can be used to clean up the environment or to pollute it. It can be used to argue for God or against Him. Science by itself offers no moral guidance or values to govern our lives. All science can do is show us how natural law works, while telling us nothing about its origins.

 The Problems of Evolution.
Some have assumed that an evolutionary explanation of life would make God unnecessary. This overlooks some problems. Even if we assume that scientists will someday find enough “missing links” to confirm that life appeared and developed gradually over great periods of time, laws of probability would still show the need for a Creator. As a result, many scientists who believe in evolution believe also that the universe in all of its immensity and complexity did not “just happen.” Many feel compelled to acknowledge the possibility or even likelihood of an intelligent designer who provided the ingredients for life and set in motion the laws by which it developed.

The Habits of the Heart.
Mankind has been described as incurably religious. In unguarded moments of trouble or surprise, in prayer or in profanity, references to deity persist. Those who would dismiss such thoughts as bad habits or social vices are left with unanswerable questions. Denying the existence of God does not dispel the mysteries of life. Attempts to exclude God from the language of civil life does not eliminate the persistent longing for more than this life has to offer (Ecclesiastes 3:11). There is something about truth, beauty and love that makes our hearts ache. Even in our anger with a God who would permit injustice and pain, we draw upon a moral conscience to argue that life is not as it ought to be (Romans 2:14-15). Even unwillingly, we are drawn to something that is more rather than less than ourselves.

 The Background of Genesis.
On first reading, the opening words of the Bible seem to assume the existence of God. Genesis, however, was written at a point of time in history. Moses wrote, “In the beginning God” after Israel’s exodus from Egypt. He wrote after miraculous events that were said to have been witnessed by millions of Jews and Egyptians. From the Exodus to the coming of Messiah, the God of the Bible rests His case on events witnessed in real time and locations. Anyone who doubted the claims could visit real places and people to check out the evidence for themselves.

 The Nation of Israel.
Israel is often used as an argument against God. Many find it difficult to believe in a God who would be partial to a “chosen people.” Others find it even harder to believe in a God who would not protect His “chosen nation” from the boxcars, gas chambers, and ovens of Auschwitz and Dachau. Yet from the beginning of Old Testament history, Israel’s future was prewritten. Together with other prophets, Moses predicted not only Israel’s possession of the land but also her unparalleled suffering and dispersion throughout the whole earth, her opportunity for repentance and the saving of a ‘remnant.’

 The Claims of Christ.
Many who doubt the existence of God have reassured themselves with the thought, “If God wanted us to believe in Him, He would appear to us.” According to the Bible, that is what God has done. Writing in the 7th century B.C., the prophet Isaiah said that God would give His people a sign. A virgin would bear a son who would be called “God with us” (Isaiah 7:14; Matthew 1:23). Isaiah said this Son would be called “Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace” (Isaiah 9:6, NIV). The prophet also said that this child would die for His people’s sins before seeing His life prolonged and honored by God (Isaiah 53). According to the New Testament, Jesus claimed to be that Messiah. Under the oversight of a Roman governor named Pontius Pilate, He was crucified on charges that He claimed to be the king of Israel and that He had represented Himself as being equal with God (John 5:18).

 The Evidence of Miracles.
The reports of the first followers of Jesus agree that He did more than just claim to be the long-awaited Messiah. These witnesses said He won their trust by healing paralytics, walking on water and voluntarily dying a painful, undeserved death before rising from the dead (1 Corinthians 15:1-8). Most compelling was their claim that many witnesses had seen and talked to Christ after finding His tomb empty and before watching Him ascend visibly into the clouds. These witnesses didn’t have anything on earth to gain by their claims. They had no hopes of material wealth or power. Many became martyrs, claiming to the end that the long-awaited Messiah of Israel had lived among them, that He had become a sacrifice for sin and that he had risen from the dead to assure them of His ability to bring them to God.

 The Details of Nature.
Some who believe in God do not take His existence seriously. They reason that a God great enough to create the universe would be too big to be concerned about us. Jesus, however, confirmed what the design and detail of the natural world suggest. He showed that God is great enough to care about the smallest details of our lives. He spoke of One who not only knows every move we make but also the motives and thoughts of our heart. Jesus taught that God knows the number of hairs on our head, the concerns of our heart and even the condition of a fallen sparrow (Psalm 139; Matthew 6).

 The Voice of Experience.
The Bible says that God designs the circumstances of our lives in a way that will prompt us to look for Him (Acts 17:26). For those who do reach out for Him, the Scriptures also say that He is close enough to be found (v. 27). According to the apostle Paul, God is a Spirit in whom “we live and move and have our being” (v. 28). The Bible makes it just as clear, however, that we must reach out for God on His terms rather than our own. He promises to be found, not by just anyone but by those who admit their own need and are willing to trust Him rather than themselves.

You’re not alone if you are open to the existence of God but aren’t sure you can accept Jesus’ claim to be “God in the flesh.” The teacher from Nazareth promised help to those who are concerned about doing the will of God. He said, “If anyone chooses to do God’s will, he will find out whether my teaching comes from God or whether I speak on my own” (John 7:17).

If you do see the evidence for the God who revealed Himself to us through His Son, keep in mind that the Bible says Christ died to pay the price for our sins, and that all who believe in Him and are baptized into Christ will receive the gifts of forgiveness and everlasting life. The salvation Christ offers is not a reward for effort but a gift to all who in light of the evidence put their trust in Him (John 5:24; Romans 4:5; Ephesians 2:8-10).

 
1 Comment

Posted by on September 7, 2014 in Article

 

Constantly Together In Prayer  –  A study of prayer from Acts


“Prayer only makes sense when you have quit trying to do ministry alone. The following five passages were selected to provide a window into the prayer life of the early church in the book of Acts. 

97262076_640While there is not time to look at any of these passages at length, we will use them like a scrapbook to look through in order to get an idea of how and why they prayed.

Acts 2:42 
“They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer.”

The first fellowship was eagerly and persistently engaged in the critical duty of prayer. Understanding the sense of loss His disciples were feelings as they anticipated His leaving, the Lord Jesus Christ had promised in John 14:13-14 that “whatever you ask in My name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the  on. if you ask me anything in My name, I will do it.” 

The early church took that promise as the source of God’s provision for all their needs, and they relentlessly pursued divine help. Praying together was a hallmark of the early church:

(Acts 1:14) “They all joined together constantly in prayer, along with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with his brothers.”

(Acts 1:24) “Then they prayed, “Lord, you know everyone’s heart. Show us which of these two you have chosen”

(Acts 4:24-37) “When they heard this, they raised their voices together in prayer to God. “Sovereign Lord,” they said, “you made the heaven and the earth and the sea, and everything in them. {25} You spoke by the Holy Spirit through the mouth of your servant, our father David: “‘Why do the nations rage and the peoples plot in vain? {26} The kings of the earth take their stand and the rulers gather together against the Lord and against his Anointed One.’ {27} Indeed Herod and Pontius Pilate met together with the Gentiles and the people of Israel in this city to conspire against your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed. {28} They did what your power and will had decided beforehand should happen. {29} Now, Lord, consider their threats and enable your servants to speak your
word with great boldness. {30} Stretch out your hand to heal and perform miraculous signs and wonders through the name of your holy servant Jesus.” 

Acts 4:24-31 Notice the four parts of the believers’ prayer…
THEIR PRAISE v. 24 Sovereign Lord…you made the heaven and the earth and the sea…It is always appropriate to remember Who God is before we address any situation. 

SCRIPTURE w. 25-26 Quote from Psalm 2:1-2. They were comforted in that their opposition had been foretold by David. They were, in fact, a fulfillment of prophecy. Satan’s efforts only succeeded in fulfilling God’s eternal plan. 

THE PROBLEM w. 27-28 Their opposition was because they belonged to Jesus.

THEIR REQUEST w. 29-30 They did not ask for protection or a place to hide, but instead asked for even more courage to boldly proclaim God’s truth – the very thing they had been ordered not to do.

GOD’S RESPONSE v.31 God’s answer was not long in coming for the building was shaken and they spoke the word of God more boldly.

Acts 6:1-4
“In those days when the number of disciples was increasing, the Grecian Jews among them complained against the Hebraic Jews because their widows were being overlooked in the daily distribution of food. {2} So the Twelve gathered all the disciples together and said, “It would not be right for us to neglect the ministry of the word of God in order to wait on tables. {3} Brothers, choose seven men from among you who are known to be full of the Spirit and wisdom. We will turn this responsibility over to them {4} and will give our attention to prayer and the ministry of the word.””

Prayer and ministry of the word were inseparably linked. God’s people must always seek that marvelous harmony of Bible study and prayer. 

Bible study without prayer can lead to self-righteousness and spiritual dryness; Prayer without Bible study can lead to a perpetual condition of spiritual immaturity.

The apostles wisely recognized:
· that hurry and over commitment are the enemies of spirituality
· that we can do more than pray after we have prayed, but we cannot do more than pray until we have prayed! 

Still for most of us there is a great feeling that when we pray we are doing nothing, and this feeling makes us give undue importance to work, sometimes even to the hurrying over or even to the neglect of prayer. 

Like the early church, we must remember not to rest too much on the arm of flesh and to make of first Importance the practice of relying first and foremost upon the arm of God.

In the words of A.W. Tozer, “God wants us to take care of the depth of our ministry; He will take care of the breadth of our ministry.”

Acts 9:40-41 
“Peter sent them all out of the room; then he got down on his knees and prayed. Turning toward the dead woman, he said, “Tabitha, get up.” She opened her eyes, and seeing Peter she sat up. {41} He took her by the hand and helped her to her feet. Then he called the believers and the widows and presented her to them alive.”

As he had seen the Lord do when He raised Jairus’ daughter (Mark 5:40), Peter sent them all out of the room where Dorcas’ body lay. He would not put on a display before the crowd that would draw all attention to him; and wanted a quiet place to pray. 

Some might think that Peter, who had been involved in many healings should simply have commanded Dorcas to rise. He knew, however, the source of his power and presumed nothing about the will of God.

(Acts 12:1-12) “It was about this time that King Herod arrested some who belonged to the church, intending to persecute them. {2} He had James, the brother of John, put to death with the sword. {3} When he saw that
this pleased the Jews, he proceeded to seize Peter also. This happened during the Feast of Unleavened Bread. {4} After arresting him, he put him in prison, handing him over to be guarded by four squads of four soldiers
each. Herod intended to bring him out for public trial after the Passover. {5} So Peter was kept in prison, but the church was earnestly praying to God for him. {6} The night before Herod was to bring him to trial, Peter was sleeping between two soldiers, bound with two chains, and sentries stood guard at the entrance. {7} Suddenly an angel of the Lord appeared and a light shone in the cell. He struck Peter on the side and woke him up. “Quick, get up!” he said, and the chains fell off Peter’s wrists. {8} Then the angel said to him, “Put on your clothes and
sandals.” And Peter did so. “Wrap your cloak around you and follow me,” the angel told him. {9} Peter followed him out of the prison, but he had no idea that what the angel was doing was really happening; he thought he was seeing a vision. {10} They passed the first and second guards and came to the iron gate leading to the city. It opened for them by itself, and they went through it. When they had walked the length of one street, suddenly the angel left him. {11} Then Peter came to himself and said, “Now I know without a doubt that the Lord sent his angel and rescued me from Herod’s clutches and from everything the Jewish people were anticipating.” {12} When this had dawned on him, he went to the house of Mary the mother of John, also called Mark, where many people had gathered and were praying.”

While Peter was kept in prison, the church responded as they usually did when facing persecution: fervent prayer. They knew the battle was spiritual in nature and that only God had the power to release Peter. 

The church poured the maximum effort they were capable of into their prayers for Peter. They knew the truth James was later to express, that “the prayer of a righteous man is powerful and effective” (James 5:16). 

What would you conclude to be some of their basic beliefs about God and about prayer?
1. They relentlessly pursued divine help according to the promise of Jesus. 
2. They believed God would protect them, so they prayed for boldness instead! 
3. They understood the premier importance of bath prayer and the Apostles’ words. 
4. They knew God was the source of power and prayer was not for the sake of show. 
5. They prayed with maximum effort, knowing their battle was truly a spiritual one.

· Stephen prayed as he was being stoned (Acts 7:55-60). 
· Peter and John prayed for the Samaritans (Acts 8:14-17)
· Saul of Tarsus prayed after his conversion (Acts 9:11). 
· Cornelius prayed that God would show him how to be saved (Acts 10:1-4)
· Peter was on the housetop praying when God told him how to be the answer to Cornelius’ prayers (Acts 10:9).
· The church at Antioch fasted and prayed before sending out Barnabas and Paul (Acts 13:1-3; and note 14:23). 
· It was at a prayer meeting in Philippi that God opened Lydia’s heart (Acts 16:13)
· another prayer meeting in Philippi opened the prison doors (Acts 16:25ff). 
· Paul prayed for his friends before leaving them (Acts 20:36; 21:5). 
· In the midst of a storm, he prayed for God’s blessing (Acts 27:35)
· after a storm, he prayed that God would heal a sick man (Acts 28:8). 

In almost every chapter in Acts you find a reference to prayer, and the book makes it very clear that something happens when God’s people pray.

This is certainly a good lesson for the church today. Prayer is both the thermometer and the thermostat of the local church; for the “spiritual temperature” either goes up or down, depending on how God’s people pray. 

John Bunyan, author of Pilgrim’s Progress, said, “Prayer is a shield to the soul, a sacrifice to God, and a scourge to Satan.” In the Book of Acts, you see prayer accomplishing all of these things.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 4, 2014 in Article

 

“What is Heaven Going to be Like?” — Revelation 21:1-22:5


“That which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God” (Luke 16:15).  In the Apostle John’s day, Rome was the admired city; yet God compared it to a harlot.

Human history begins in a Garden and ends in a City that is like a garden paradise.

 The eternal city of God is compared to a beautiful bride (Rev. 21:9), because it is the eternal home for God’s beloved people.

God’s statements recorded in Revelation 21:5-6 aptly summarize these final two chapters: “Behold, I make all things new. . . . It is done!” What began in Genesis is brought to completion in Revelation, as the following summary shows:

 

Genesis Revelation
Heavens and earth created, 1:1 New heavens and earth, 21:1
Sun created, 1:16 No need of the sun, 21:23
The night established, 1:5 No night there 22:5
The seas created, 1:10 No more seas, 21:1
The curse announced, 3:14-17 No more curse, 22:3
Death enters history, 3:19 No more death, 21:4
Man driven from the tree, 3:24 Man restored to paradise, 22:14
Sorrow and pain begin, 3:17 No more tears or pain, 21:4

 We come to the closing scene in Revelation. Here is the most comprehensive section of encouragement for struggling brethren. Throughout this book there have been hints of immortality: the promises to the Conquerors, the white robed multitudes, the triumphant song of Moses and the Lamb, the wedding feast of the Lamb and His bride. Now at last John is given a vision that surveys the Promised Land. In some ways this is the most important part of his book, as it is certainly the most familiar and beloved.

 As this section is read you cannot help but recall a number of Old Testament passages, thus once again we find an intimate connection with the prophets of old:

Isa. 25:8 he will swallow up death forever. The Sovereign LORD will wipe away the tears

       from all faces; he will remove the disgrace of his people from all the earth. The LORD has spoken.

Isa. 65:17  “Behold, I will create        new heavens and a new earth. The former things will not be remembered,nor will they come to mind.

Isa. 65:19  I will rejoice over Jerusalem and take delight in my people; the sound of weeping and of crying will be heard in it no more.

Isa. 66:22  “As the new heavens and the new earth that I make will endure before me,” declares the LORD, “so will your name and descendants endure.

Isa. 55:1 “Come, all you who are thirsty, come to the waters;            and you who have no money,

       come, buy and eat! Come, buy wine and milk without money and without cost.

Isa. 60:20 Your sun will never set again, and your moon will wane no more; the LORD will be your everlasting light, and your days of sorrow will end.

Ezek. 36:28 You will live in the land I gave your forefathers; you will be my people, and I will be your God.

Ezek. 37:28 Then the nations will know that I the LORD make Israel holy, when my sanctuary is among them forever.’”

Ezek. 48:31 the gates of the city will be named after the tribes of Israel. The three gates on the north side will be the gate of Reuben, the gate of Judah and the gate of Levi.

Ezek. 47:12 Fruit trees of all kinds will grow on both banks of the river. Their leaves will not wither, nor will their fruit fail. Every month they will bear, because the water from the sanctuary flows to them. Their fruit will serve for food and their leaves for healing.”

2 Sam. 7:14 I will be his father, and he will be my son. When he does wrong, I will punish him with the rod of men, with floggings inflicted by men.

Zech. 14:6-8 On that day there will be no light, no cold or frost. 7It will be a unique day, without daytime or nighttime—a day known to the LORD. When evening comes, there will be light. On that day living water will flow out from Jerusalem, half to the eastern sea£ and half to the western sea,£ in summer and in winter.

In this section there is a marvelous message to believers – “Do not give up because you have a wonderful destiny ahead!” The destiny of the redeemed is to be in the “new” Jerusalem. Literally the phrase means, “The new city of peace.” In contrast to their present trials and burdens they would share in grand blessings. It is this beautiful city of peace that brings great comfort and cheer to struggling saints.

Body: Notice how cheer would be brought to believers as they come to know about this eternal home of the saved.

A. This city of peace provides ETERNAL FELLOWSHIP with God (Revelation 21:1-8):

Rev. 21:1 through Rev. 21:8 1Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea. 2I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband. 3And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, “Now the dwelling of God is with men, and he will live with them. They will be his people, and God himself will be with them and be their God. 4He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away.”

5He who was seated on the throne said, “I am making everything new!” Then he said, “Write this down, for these words are trustworthy and true.”

6He said to me: “It is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. To him who is thirsty I will give to drink without cost from the spring of the water of life. 7He who overcomes will inherit all this, and I will be his God and he will be my son. 8But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars—their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death.”

They are God’s people (vv. 1-5).

The first heaven and earth were prepared for the first man and woman and their descendants. God had readied everything for them when He placed them in the Garden. Unfortunately, our first parents sinned, ushering death and decay into God’s beautiful world. Creation is in bondage and travail (Rom. 8:18-23), and even the heavens “are not clean in His sight” (Job 15:15).

God has promised His people a new heaven and earth (Isa. 65:17; 66:22). The old creation must make way for the new creation if God is to be glorified. Jesus called this event “the regeneration” of the earth (Matt. 19:28), and Peter explained it as a cleansing and renewing by fire (2 Peter 3:10-13). Bible students are not agreed as to whether the old elements will be renewed or whether the old will be destroyed and a whole new creation ushered in. It is clear to me that whatever God has prepared for my spiritual body will be exactly what He planned and exactly what it needs!

Even despite Scripture’s description, it is difficult to imagine what the eternal city will be like. John characterizes it as a holy city (see Rev. 21:27), a prepared city (see John 14:1-6), and a beautiful city, as beautiful as a bride on her wedding day.

But the most important thing about the city is that God dwells there with His people. The Bible gives an interesting record of the dwelling places of God. First, God walked with man in the Garden of Eden. Then He dwelt with Israel in the tabernacle and later the temple. When Israel sinned, God had to depart from those dwellings. Later, Jesus Christ came to earth and “tabernacled” among us (John 1:14). Today, God does not live in man-made temples (Acts 7:48-50), but in the bodies of His people (1 Cor. 6:19-20) and in the church (Eph. 2:21-22).

In both the tabernacle and the temple, the veil stood between men and God. That veil was torn in two when Jesus died, thus opening a “new and living way” for God’s people (Heb. 10:19ff). Even though God dwells in believers today by His Spirit, we still have not begun to understand God or fellowship with Him as we would like; but one day, we shall dwell in God’s presence and enjoy Him forever.

The eternal city is so wonderful that the best way John found to describe it was by contrast—“no more.” The believers who first read this inspired book must have rejoiced to know that, in heaven, there would be no more pain, tears, sorrow, or death; for many of their number had been tortured and slain. In every age, the hope of heaven has encouraged God’s people in times of suffering.

Verses 3-4 explain, in symbolic language, the beauty of this promised fellowship. This fellowship allows saints to find access to high joy

a. God dwells with them in one tent (Revelation 7:15).

b. The Lamb is their Shepherd (Revelation 7:17).

c. God wipes every tear out of their eyes (Revelation 7:17).

d. They are constantly worshiping in the sanctuary (Revelation 7:15).

e. They sit with him on the throne and He sups with them(Revelation 3:20, 21).

The beauty of this fellowship is enhanced as we see that it is offered absolutely free (Revelation 21:6; 22:17b). Surely the sensible person will see the necessity to remain faithful so he can inherit this wonderful fellowship! (Revelation 21:7).

A greater emphasis is added when the reverse is considered. Those who fail to establish and maintain fellowship with God now will not find it in eternity (Revelation 21:8; Romans 6:23). God’s city of peace will not include any who associate with Satan! (Revelation 21:27).

 These heavenly citizens are an overcoming people (vv. 7-8).

“He that overcometh” is a key phrase in this book (Rev. 2:7, 11, 17, 26; 3:5, 12, 21; note also 12:11). As John pointed out in his first epistle, all true believers are overcomers (1 John 5:4-5), so this promise is not just for the “spiritually elite.” Because we are the children of God, we shall inherit all things.

 In contrast to the overcomers, Revelation 21:8 describes the people who were overcome by sin and would not trust the Lord. What is their destiny? The lake of fire! The world considers Christians as “losers,” but it is the unbelievers who are the losers!

 The fearful are the cowardly, the people who did not have the courage to stand up for Christ (see Matt. 10:32-33). The word abominable means “polluted,” and refers to those who indulged in sin and were thus polluted in mind, spirit, and body (2 Cor. 7:1). The other characteristics mentioned in Revelation 21:8 need no special explanation, except to note that all of them would be true of “the beast’s” followers (note Rev. 17:4, 6; 18:3, 9; 19:2).

 The recipients of John’s letter would be challenged to evaluate their relationship with God. John was writing the Christians and telling them they must be sure they were fit to be among those blessed by heaven’s rewards. John had earlier challenged these Christians by pointing out that some were claiming to be fit for heaven but were not – their religion was only a pretense (i.e. the 7 churches). As we think of this point may we also be challenged so we will not be deceived thinking we are fit for heaven when we are actually fit for Satan’s evil work.

 Out of the Seven Churches mentioned only ONE was without fault and only TWO were commended!

a. Ephesus did not really “love” God (Revelation 2:4).

b. Pergamum did not demonstrate conviction (Revelation 2:14-15).

c. Thyatira encouraged rebellion to God (Revelation 2:20).

d. Sardis was spiritually dead (Revelation 3:1).

e. Laodicea was apathetic (Revelation 3:15).

 B. This city of peace is blessed with ETERNAL PROTECTION by God (Revelation 21:9-26):

Rev. 21:9 through Rev. 21:26 9One of the seven angels who had the seven bowls full of the seven last plagues came and said to me, “Come, I will show you the bride, the wife of the Lamb.” 10And he carried me away in the Spirit to a mountain great and high, and showed me the Holy City, Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God. 11It shone with the glory of God, and its brilliance was like that of a very precious jewel, like a jasper, clear as crystal. 12It had a great, high wall with twelve gates, and with twelve angels at the gates. On the gates were written the names of the twelve tribes of Israel. 13There were three gates on the east, three on the north, three on the south and three on the west. 14The wall of the city had twelve foundations, and on them were the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.

15The angel who talked with me had a measuring rod of gold to measure the city, its gates and its walls. 16The city was laid out like a square, as long as it was wide. He measured the city with the rod and found it to be 12,000 stadia£ in length, and as wide and high as it is long. 17He measured its wall and it was 144 cubits£ thick,£ by man’s measurement, which the angel was using. 18The wall was made of jasper, and the city of pure gold, as pure as glass. 19The foundations of the city walls were decorated with every kind of precious stone. The first foundation was jasper, the second sapphire, the third chalcedony, the fourth emerald, 20the fifth sardonyx, the sixth carnelian, the seventh chrysolite, the eighth beryl, the ninth topaz, the tenth chrysoprase, the eleventh jacinth, and the twelfth amethyst.£ 21The twelve gates were twelve pearls, each gate made of a single pearl. The great street of the city was of pure gold, like transparent glass.

22I did not see a temple in the city, because the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple. 23The city does not need the sun or the moon to shine on it, for the glory of God gives it light, and the Lamb is its lamp. 24The nations will walk by its light, and the kings of the earth will bring their splendor into it. 25On no day will its gates ever be shut, for there will be no night there. 26The glory and honor of the nations will be brought into it.

 The Character of the City (Rev. 21:9-22:5)

The eternal city is not only the home of the bride; it is the bride! A city is not buildings; it is people. The city John saw was holy and heavenly; in fact, it descended to earth from heaven, where it was prepared. John’s description staggers the imagination, even accepting the fact that a great deal of symbolism is involved. Heaven is a real place of glory and beauty, the perfect home for the Lamb’s bride.

 We have already noted that “the glory of God” has appeared in different places throughout history. God’s glory dwelt in the tabernacle and then in the temple. Today, His glory dwells in believers and in His church. For all eternity, the glory of God will be seen in His holy city. It is the only light the city will need.

 The city’s description follows the pattern of cities with which John’s readers were familiar: foundations, walls, and gates. The foundations speak of permanence, in contrast to the tents in which “pilgrims and strangers” lived (Heb. 11:8-10). The walls and gates speak of protection. God’s people will never have to fear any enemies. Angels at the gates will act as sentries!

 In this city, saints of the Old Covenant and the New Covenant will be united. The twelve gates are identified with the twelve tribes of Israel, and the twelve foundations with the 12 Apostles (see Eph. 2:20).

 John had measured the earthly Jerusalem (Rev. 11), but now he is invited to measure the heavenly city. Foursquare means “equal on all sides,” so the city might be a cube or a pyramid. More importantly, the fact that it is equal on all sides indicates the perfection of God’s eternal city: nothing is out of order or balance.

 The measurements are staggering, though given only to signify its greater meaning! If we take a cubit as eighteen inches, then the city walls are 216 feet high! If a furlong is taken as 600 feet (measures differed in ancient days), the city would be about 1,500 miles square! There will be plenty of room for everyone!

 The city’s construction cannot but fascinate us. The walls are jasper, which is a clear crystal; but the city itself will be made of pure gold, as clear as crystal. The light of God’s glory will shine throughout the city, resembling a huge holy of holies.

 Building foundations are usually underground, but these foundations will not only be visible but beautifully garnished with precious stones. Each separate foundation will have its own jewel, and the blending of the colors will be magnificent as God’s light shines through.

 Our God is a God of beauty, and He will lavish His beauty on the city He is preparing for His people. Perhaps Peter had the holy city in mind when he wrote about the “manifold grace of God” (1 Peter 4:10), for the word translated “manifold” means “many colored, variegated.”

 In ancient times, the pearl was considered a “royal gem,” produced by a mollusk covering an irritating grain of sand within its shell. But the pearl gates of the heavenly city will never be closed (Rev. 21:25) because there will be no danger of anything entering that would disturb or defile her citizens.

 John noted that some items were missing from the city, but their absence only magnified its glory. There will be no temple, since the entire city will be indwelt by God’s presence. Indeed, “secular” and “sacred” will be indistinguishable in heaven. The sun and moon will be absent since the Lord is the light of the city, and there will never be any night (see Isa. 60:19).

 1. John’s readers knew the need to be protected. Knowing you are kept safe brings great security and peace. The essence of protection was a great city surrounded by a great wall. Here we read of such a place described in symbolic language.

a. “Twelve gates” – abundant entrance where no one who desired would be forbidden entrance.

b. “Twelve foundations” – such a perfect foundation could never be shaken.

c. “Four Square” – this city will have enough room for all the redeemed under the Old Testament and  New Testament (12b, 14b).

 2. The description is of a strong, spacious, perfect, and beautiful city where God’s redeemed will live with Him in perfect fellowship! To try to make this a literal city on earthly Jerusalem destroys the symbol.

 3. No where else can man find a more appealing description of God’s home for saved souls!

 C. The city of peace is supplied with ETERNAL PROVISIONS from God (Revelation 22:1-5):

Rev. 22:1 through Rev. 22:5 1Then the angel showed me the river of the water of life, as clear as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb 2down the middle of the great street of the city. On each side of the river stood the tree of life, bearing twelve crops of fruit, yielding its fruit every month. And the leaves of the tree are for the healing of the nations. 3No longer will there be any curse. The throne of God and of the Lamb will be in the city, and his servants will serve him. 4They will see his face, and his name will be on their foreheads. 5There will be no more night. They will not need the light of a lamp or the light of the sun, for the Lord God will give them light. And they will reign for ever and ever.

 1. So great is this New Jerusalem and so magnificently designed by God, it does not need many things that are essential to present life.

a. There is “no temple” (Revelation 21:22). No sins need atonement and saints are in God’s presence always.

b. There is “no sun or moon” (Revelation 21:23). The radiance of the Lamb is all that is needed.

c. There is “no night” (Revelation 22:25). There is no darkness for God is light. There is no need for labors have ceased.

 2. Note the provisions offered by God . . .

a. The garden – Eden will be restored and eternally enjoyed.

b. Water of Life – Symbolic of salvation. It is offered full and free (Psalm 46:4a). The beauty is marvelous (Revelation 22:1).

c. Trees of Life – Not just one but whole rows on either side of the river. Fruit is always present.

d. Throne of God and the Lamb – The sovereignty of God will be the center of attention. This throne dominates so that God’s will is supreme. Never again will the saints battle against the Dragon for God is supreme!

 3. What a striking picture! Pause and reflect on it and sense the strong assurance it offers! What greater provisions could we seek?

 D. This city of peace is a place of ETERNAL SERVICE to God (Revelation 22:3, 5):

Rev. 22:3 3No longer will there be any curse. The throne of God and of the Lamb will be in the city, and his servants will serve him. 

Rev. 22:5 5There will be no more night. They will not need the light of a lamp or the light of the sun, for the Lord God will give them light. And they will reign for ever and ever.

1. It is misleading to assume heaven will be a place of leisure where all desires are immediately provided angels (See Revelation 7:15b –”day and night”).

2. Notice how service is pictured in verses 3, 5.

a. The entire population will offer priestly service.

b. Service is rendered and is focused on God.

c. Here is a continuation of service that has been offered on earth!

Note: Matthew 25:21 – service on earth leads to service in heaven. We must understand this simple point (Matthew 25:26-30).

d. Heaven will be populated ONLY by those who love to serve God on earth, in the church!

What will we do in heaven for all eternity? Certainly, we shall praise the Lord, but we shall also serve Him. “His servants shall serve Him” (Rev. 22:3) is a great encouragement to us, for in heaven our service will be perfect. As we seek to serve the Lord here on earth, we are constantly handicapped by sin and weakness; but all hindrances will be gone when we get to glory. Perfect service in a perfect environment!

What will this service be? We are not told, nor do we need to know now. It is sufficient that we know what God wants us to do today. Our faithfulness in life prepares us for higher service in heaven. In fact, some students think that we shall have access to the vast universe and perhaps be sent on special missions to other places. But it is useless to speculate, because God has not seen fit to fill in the details.

Certainly, many interesting questions could be asked about our future abode in heaven, but most must go unanswered until we reach our glorious home. In fact, John closed his book by reminding us that we have responsibilities today becausewe are going to heaven.

II. From this final vision we discover the following . . .

A. God answers our desires to know what the future will bring. In symbols He has told us that heaven is a beautiful city of peace where we will find eternal fellowship, protection, provision, and service to God.

B. In this section we have a dramatic contrast with chapter 20. We have here encouragement to remain faithful because eternal destiny will be lived in either the New Jerusalem or the Lake of Fire! (Revelation 21:27).

C. Our ability to enjoy heaven depends on how much we enjoy the church on earth. It is hard to imagine how some will enjoy an eternity of that which appears to be intolerable on earth!

1. Eternal fellowship with brethren.

2. Eternal Protection by the Almighty’s power.

3. Eternal worship assemblies of praise to God.

4. Eternal service to God with the redeemed.

D. Those with whom we identify on earth will be those we will identify with in eternity!

E. We discover an answer to the problem of earth’s evils (v. 4). God lists some of the more prominent evils that will cease. The Lamb has conquered and has answered the problems of the world.

F. Entrance into God’s heaven is not open to just anyone, but only to those who have been given the right (Revelation 21:27). We must make preparations to enter now or else run the risk of never being admitted!

The Challenge of the City (Rev. 22:6-21)

Heaven is more than a destination; it is a motivation. Knowing that we shall dwell in the heavenly city ought to make a difference in our lives here and now. The vision of the heavenly city motivated the patriarchs as they walked with God and served Him (Heb. 11:10, 13-16). Knowing that He was returning to the Father in heaven also encouraged Jesus Christ as He faced the cross (Heb. 12:2). The assurance of heaven must not lull us into complacency or carelessness, but spur us to fulfill our spiritual duties.

We must keep God’s Word (vv. 6-11, 18-19).

Because what John wrote is the Word of God, his words are faithful and true (see Rev. 19:11). The same God who spoke through the prophets also spoke through the Apostle John. As the “capstone” of God’s revelation, John’s book cannot be divorced from the rest of the Bible. If we deny that John wrote the truth, then we must also deny the prophets.

What does it mean to “keep the sayings of the prophecy of this book”? (Rev. 22:7) Basically, it means to guard, to watch over, to preserve intact. We must not add to the Word of God or take anything from it (see Deut. 4:2; Prov. 30:5-6).

It was customary in ancient days for writers to put this kind of warning at the close of their books, because the people who copied them for public distribution might be tempted to tamper with the material. However, John’s warning was not addressed to a writer, but to the hearer, the believer in the congregation where this book was read aloud. By analogy, however, it would apply to anyone reading and studying the book today. We may not be able to explain the penalties given, but we do know this: it is a dangerous thing to tamper with the Word of God. The one who guards the Word and obeys it will be blessed; the one who alters it will be disciplined in some way.

For a second time, John was overwhelmed by what he saw and heard; and he fell down to worship the angel who was speaking to him (see Rev. 19:10). The angel gave John three words of counsel: do not worship angels; worship God; and do not seal up the Revelation. The Prophet Daniel was commanded to seal his book (Dan. 12:4), because the time was not yet ready. John’s book was an “apocalypse,” an unveiling (Rev. 1:1); and, therefore, it must not be sealed.

Once again, the Holy Spirit is reminding us of the living unity of God’s Word. We have seen in our study how John, led by the Spirit, reached back into the Old Testament and used many of the images found there, including Daniel’s prophecy. Scripture is its own best interpreter.

Does Revelation 22:11 suggest that God does not want men to repent and change their ways? No, because that would be contrary to the message of Revelation and of the Gospel itself. The angel’s words must be understood in light of the repeated statement, “Behold, I come quickly” (Rev. 22:7, 12), as well as his statement, “For the time is at hand” (Rev. 22:10). Jesus Christ’s coming will occur so quickly that men will not have time to change their characters.

Revelation 22:11, therefore, is a solemn warning that decision determines character, and character determines destiny. Suffering believers might ask, “Is it worth it to live a godly life?” John’s reply is, “Yes! Jesus is returning, and He will reward you!” Next comes John’s second admonition.

We have the responsibility of serving the Lord (vv. 12-14).

“My reward is with Me” implies that God is mindful of our sufferings and our service, and nothing will ever be done in vain if it is done for Him. At the Judgment Seat of Christ, believers will be judged according to their works; and rewards will be given to those who have been faithful.

Throughout church history, there have been those who have become “so heavenly minded that they were no earthly good.” They quit their jobs, sold their property, and sat and waited for Jesus to return. All of them have been embarrassed, of course, because it is unbiblical to set dates for His coming. It is also unbiblical to become careless and lazy just because we believe Jesus is coming soon. Paul faced this problem with some of the believers in Thessalonica (2 Thes. 3).

No wonder John added, “Blessed are they that do His commandments” (Rev. 22:14). If we really believe that Jesus is coming soon, we will watch and be faithful (Luke 12:35ff).

Revelation 22:13 is a great encouragement to anyone who seeks to serve the Lord. Whatever God starts, He will finish; for He is the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, the first and the last (see Phil. 1:6; 2:12-13).

We must keep our lives clean (vv. 15-16).

The contrast here is between those who do God’s commandments and enter the city, and those who reject His Word and are excluded from the city (see Rev. 21:8, 27). It is not likely that those who “do His commandments” are a special or an elite group of saints. The phrase is similar to “them that overcome” and characterizes all the people of God. Obedience to God’s Word is a mark of true salvation.

We must keep expecting Jesus Christ to return (vv. 17, 20-21).

Three times in this closing chapter John wrote, “I [Christ] come quickly” (Rev. 22:7, 12, 20). But He has “delayed” His return for nearly 2,000 years! Yes, He has; and Peter tells us why: God wants to give this sinful world opportunity to repent and be saved (2 Peter 3:1ff).

In the meantime, the Spirit of God, through the church (the bride), calls for Jesus to come; for the bride wants to meet her Bridegroom and enter into her home. “Even so, come, Lord Jesus” (Rev. 22:20).

But believers ought also to invite lost sinners to trust Christ and drink the water of life. Indeed, when the church lives in expectancy of Christ’s return, such an attitude provokes ministry and evangelism as well as purity of heart. We want to tell others of the grace of God. A true understanding of Bible prophecy should both motivate us to obey God’s Word and to share God’s invitation with a lost world.

Conclusion:

This is a beautiful section from Revelation. It is filled with hope, cheer, and encouragement. John’s message closes with a most practical message. The reason why a Christian is not to surrender to the temptation of distress is because of the “home over there.” There is perfection and peace so “Don’t give up!

If our study of Revelation has been truly led by the Spirit, then we will join John in the Bible’s last prayer:

“Even so, come, Lord Jesus!”

Are you ready?

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 2, 2014 in Article

 

“Finding God When You Need Him Most” series


Our perceptions always determine our actions. When we think we are in danger; we feel a desperate need to find a safe place. We know we can take shelter at our house, so we dash to the door.

We all have times like these. Most people run to God—almost instinctively. Even people who aren’t too sure about God. Why? Somehow, we know deep down—or at least hope—that God will be our shelter. We begin this series to encourage us to run to God whenever:

  • you get a raw deal and life just isn’t fair
  • you’re going through a crisis or a major life transition
  • you feel like a nobody going nowhere
  • you’re troubled and depressed
  • you’re gripped by fear
  • you’ve blown it big time
  • you’re confused

God’s Word, the Bible, will enable us to see our situation in a different way. It will flip on the porch light over our soul so we can see what’s really going on and what God would have us do about it. I’m telling you up front that God is the place to run. He is and always has been a shelter, a safe place where people can take refuge. God is real and ready to open his door to all who run to him in times of need.

Each of the coming lessons look at a specific need in light of one of the Psalms—the songbook of God’s people.

The Psalms are God-breathed, so they give truth and light. They were written by real people who didn’t hold back their emotions. These people dared to bring their desperate needs to God.

This is my prayer as we begin this journey together: “O LORD, open their eyes and let them see!”

This prayer is from the prophet Elisha. He used it on an occasion similar to the tough spot in which Michael found himself. The story is told in 2 Kings 6:8–23.

Elisha and his servant were wanted men. The king of Aram had a contract out on their lives. Eventually, someone revealed their location to the king, and he sent an army by night to capture the prophet and his assistant. The soldiers quietly surrounded the village where Elisha was staying.

When morning came, the servant left the house. Everywhere he looked there were armed men on horseback. Chariots, spears, and swords blocked every way of escape. Elisha and his companion were surrounded. In shock and despair the servant called out to Elisha, “Oh, sir, what will we do now?” (2 Kings 6:15 NLT). Instead of answering his servant’s question, Elisha addressed his terror. “Don’t be afraid. . . . There are more on our side than on theirs!” said the prophet. Before the servant could ask what he meant, “Elisha prayed, ‘O LORD, open his eyes and let him see!’ The LORD opened the young man’s eyes, and when he looked up, he saw that the hillside around Elisha was filled with horses and chariots of fire” (2 Kings 6:16–17 NLT).

The prophet’s assistant caught a glimpse of ultimate reality. He learned a lesson that God allows each of us to learn throughout life: there is so much more to life than what we can see.

Unless we can learn to expect God’s continual presence in every part of life, we won’t be able to experience his presence when we need it most. 

Our prayer: “O Lord, open our eyes and let us see!”

Facts about the Psalms

  • Quoted more in NT than any other book – 263 passages
  • The final collection took just over 1,500 years
  • 73 (almost half) ascribed to David, 12 to Asaph, 10 to the sons of Korah (or his descendents), 2 to Solomon, and one to Moses, Heman the Ezrahite (88), and Ethan the Ezrahite (89)
  • Those without subtitles are called ‘orphan’ psalms
  • The collection was composed primarily for the Israelite nation

Uses of the Psalms

  1. Use them as a guide in our learning to think about God
  2. They help in our struggle of learning to pray

Let’s now look at PSALM 1 and 3

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 31, 2014 in Article